Developing a suitable mechanism to stimulate the effective redeployment of capital to social activities can be designed using the corporate social responsibility (CSR) concept. Informational asymmetry about the real state of social risks influences the effectiveness of allocations in social protection. Reducing information asymmetries can be achieved by providing the corporations with socially determined risk profiles based on predetermined patterns. Offering concrete lines of action following the risk profiles approach which to base investment decisions of companies in CSR can maximize the results of such a mechanism. In a previous study the authors have developed a theoretical model for determining the poverty risk profile. This study aims to present the practical application of the theoretical model and to provide comments on some errors. Hence, the authors analyzed Buzau county municipalities in presenting the highest risk level determined by the theoretical model and related causes and performed an impact assessment of an investment in CSR based on a model. Specifically, the authors evaluated the impact of reducing the risk of poverty for a suitable investment in CSR. In the second part of the study, the authors analyzed the types of errors that can be found in the municipalities risk profile model due to the granularity of the data. Thus, for the error of over-inclusion, the authors assessed social allocative efficiency at the community level using benchmarking analysis, Data Envelopment respectively and analyzed the data of the under-inclusion error in Buzau county villages. The paper aims to analyze the relative limits on quantitative models and risk of poverty and the practical implementation of these types of models in the development of corporate social responsibility. The study provides also a useful tool which can be made available to companies in order to increase the vulnerable groups’ life quality and the satisfaction of shareholders, stakeholders and related parties following redeployments according to specific CSR mechanisms.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Ravallion M. (1988) and Chao K. (1988). Targeted Policies for Poverty Alleviation under Imperfect Information: Algorithms and Applications. Mimeo Australian National University.
Dr. Castka P. Dr. Bamber C. and Professor Sharp J.M. (2005). Implementing Effective Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance. Business Information (BSI).
Cox D. (1987). Motives for Private Income Transfers. Journal of Political Economy vol. 95(3) 508-46.
Cox D. (1987) (1989). The Connection between Social Security and Private inter family transfers. Mimeo Boston.
Daisuke A. (1999). Ethics Compliance Management Systems. Ethics Compliance Standard 2000 (ECS2000) Business Ethics Research Project Reitaku Centre for Economic Studies.
Serbanescu C. Vintilescu A. Corches L. (2017). Efficiency and effectiveness in social assistance using corporate social responsibility and the risk profile. Romanian National Internal Control Institute study.
Farrell M.J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120(3) 253-281.
Wade D. Cook Kaoru Tone and Joe Zhu (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega 44(C).
Coelli T. Rao D.S.P. & Battese G.E. (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Boston MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Government Order no. 799/2014 issued by the Romanian Government regarding the implementation of the operational program to help disadvantaged people.
Buzau County Geopark Study directions of socio-economic development Geomedia Center University of Bucharest 2007.
Sustainable Development Strategy and Action Plan for Buzau County 2014 – 2020 Buzau County Council 2016.
www.insse.ro/cms/ (accessed on December 31st 2016).
www.dgaspc-Buzau.ro/studiianalize/ (accessed on December 31st 2016)