Nowadays the training-educational process is a dynamic and complex process which uses both classical and modern teaching methods in order to obtain performance in education. Even though traditional teaching methods have a formal character interaction between teacher and students, this is face-to-face and therefore students can give an immediate feedback. From this point of view classical teaching methods are important from time to time. In Romania, in the European context the role of effective learning strategies represents the key point for the education process. The role of teachers in developing creativity to those students who want to learn in an interactive way is very important because they should imply that students directly in the training -educational process. In this context the educational process must be student centered because only in this way their critical thinking and creativity is developed. We can say that when non-formal and informal learning is combined with formal learning the scope of pedagogy is accomplish. In contemporary context education is regarded as an innovative concept which is used to produce performance at the individual level and also, at institutional level, education provides support in order to build strategies according to the challenges from the labour market. The paper is based on a qualitative research, conducted on a sample of 100 people aged between 19 and 23 years old (students at a Business School). The key question raised at this point is: What is the role of classical and modern teaching methods in training-educational process? The objectives of this study are the following: 1). highlighting the context of higher education in Romania; 2). presenting the role of university strategy in contemporary context; 3). highlighting the importance of using classical/modern teaching methods in business education; 4). presenting the role of innovation and creativity in business education; 5). presenting the analysis of qualitative research regarding the role of classical and modern teaching methods in education. Learning skills are developed both through modern teaching and learning strategies based on creativity and interactive learning methods.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Bacellar F.C.T. and Ikeda A.A. (2006). Marketing professors: paths and perspectives. European Business Review 18(3) pp.231-241.
Bratianu C. (2007). Thinking patterns and knowledge dynamics. In Remenyi D. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp.152-156) Consorci Escola Industrial Barcelona Spain 6-7 September 2007.
Bratianu C. (2009). The frontier of linearity in the intellectual capital metaphor. In C. Stam (Ed.). Proceedings of the European Conference on Intellectual Capital (pp.97-103) Inholland University of Applied Sciences Haarlem The Ntherlands 28-29 April 2009.
Cucoş C. (2006). Pedagogie. Bucharest: Polirom.
Iatagan M. (2012). Strategii de finanțare a învățământului superior românesc în context European. Bucharest: Editura Universitară.
Ionescu M. and Chiș V. (1992). Strategii de predare – învățare. Bucharest: Editura Științifică.
Kolb A.Y. and Kolb D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(2) pp.193–212.
Lefter V. Bratianu C. Agapie A. Agoston S. and Orzea I. (2011). Intergenerational knowledge transfer in the academic environment of knowledge-based economy. Amfiteatru Economic 13(30) 392-403.
Marginson S. (2010). Higher education in the global knowledge economy. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 6962–6980.
Marinescu M. (2009). Tendinţe şi orientări în didactica modernă. Bucharest: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.
Nicolescu O. (2007). Strategia universităţii: metodologie şi studii de caz. Buharest: Editura Economică.
Oprea C.L. (2009). Strategii didactice interactive. Repere teoretice şi practice. Bucharest: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.
Platis M. and Baban E.G. (2013). Role of diversity in teaching marketing. Procedings of the 7th Conference on Challenges of the Knowledge Society (pp.981-989) University of Bucharest 17th-18th May 2013.
Tudorel A. Teodorescu D. and Oancea B. (2010). Characteristics of higher education in Romania during transition Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 3417–3421.
Tudorică R. (2007). Managementul educaţiei în context european. 2nd Edition. Bucharest: Editura Meronia.