Biomechanical changes in pregnant women

Open access

Zmiany biomechaniczne u kobiet w ciąży

Celem pracy jest przedstawienie problemów związanych z różnorodnymi biomechanicznymi zmianami w układzie mięśniowo-szkieletowym kobiet w ciąży dotyczącymi postawy ciała także w aspekcie dolegliwości bólowych, zwłaszcza w dolnym odcinku pleców. Poruszane są zagadnienia związane ze zmianą funkcjonalnego zakresu ruchomości tułowia oraz ograniczeniami i trudnościami w wykonywaniu czynności codziennych i zawodowych. W pracy przedstawiono także wpływ ciąży na stabilność posturalną i chód. Wiedza zawarta w artykule powinna być pomocna zarówno osobom prowadzącym zajęcia w szkołach rodzenia, jak też lekarzom i fizjoterapeutom w profilaktyce oraz leczeniu dolegliwości układu mięśniowo-szkieletowego u kobiet w ciąży i po porodzie.

Konkler C. J. Principles of exercise for the obstetric patient, [w:] C. Kisner, L. A. Colby,# (red.) Therapeutic exercise foundations and techniques. Davis Company, Philadelphia, 1990, 547-576.

Jensen R. K. i wsp. Changes in segment mass and mass distribution during pregnancy. J. Biomech., 1996, 29, 2, 251-256.

Gilleard W. L., Brown J. M. Structure and function of the abdominal muscles in primigravid subjects during pregnancy and the immediate postbirth period. Phys. Ther., 1996, 76, 7, 750-762.

Fast A. i wsp. Low-back pain in pregnancy. Abdominal muscles, sit-up performance, and back pain. Spine, 1990, 15, 1, 28-30

Dumas G. A., Reid J. G. Laxity of knee cruciate ligaments during pregnancy. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 1997, 26, 1, 2-6.

Franklin M. E., Conner-Kerr T. An analysis of posture and back pain in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 1998, 28, 3, 133-138.

Otman A. S. i wsp. The importance of ‘lumbar lordosis measurement device’ application during pregnancy, and post-partum isometric exercise. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 1989, 31, 2, 155-162.

Gilleard W. L. i wsp. Static trunk posture in sitting and standing during pregnancy and early postpartum. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2002, 83, 12, 1739-1744.

Ireland M. L., Ott S. M. The effects of pregnancy on the musculosceletal system. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 2000, 372, 169-179.

Ostgaard H. C. i wsp. Influence of some biomechanical factors on low-back pain in pregnancy. Spine, 1993, 18, 1, 61-65.

Novaes F. S. i wsp. Lombalgia na gestacao. (Low back pain during gestation). Rev. Lat. Am Enfermagem, 2006, 14, 4, 620-624.

Fast A. i wsp. Low-back pain in pregnancy. Spine, 1987, 12, 4, 368-371.

Ostgaard H. C. i wsp. Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine, 1991, 16, 5, 549-552.

Wu W. i wsp. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain, I: terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur. Spine J., 2004, 13, 7, 575-589.

Wang S. M. Backaches related to pregnancy: the risk factors, etiologies, treatments and controversial issues. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol., 2003, 16, 3, 269-273.

Gutke A. i wsp. Predicting persistent pregnancy-related low back pain. Spine, 2008, 33, 12, 386-393.

Ostgaard H. C. i wsp. Reduction of back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy. Spine, 1994, 19, 8, 894-900.

Gutke A. i wsp. Association between muscle function and low back pain in relation to pregnancy. J. Rehabil. Med., 2008, 40, 4, 304-311.

Ostgaard H. C. i wsp. The posterior pelvic pain provocation test in pregnant women. Eur. Spine J., 1994, 3, 5, 258-260.

Nilsson-Wikmar L. i wsp. Back pain in women post-partum is not a unitary concept. Physiother. Res. Int., 1999, 4, 3, 201-213.

Nilsson-Wikmar L. i wsp. Perceived pain and self-estimated activity limitations in women with back pain post-partum. Physiother. Res. Int., 2003, 8, 1, 23-35.

Gutke A. i wsp. Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in pregnancy: a cohort study of the consequences in terms of health and functioning. Spine, 2006, 31, 5, 149-155.

Ronchetti I. i wsp. Physical characteristics of women with severe pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a descriptive cohort study. Spine, 2008, 33, 5, 145-151.

Gilleard W. L. i wsp. Effect of pregnancy on trunk range of motion when sitting and standing. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 2002, 81, 1011-1020.

Cheng P. L. i wsp. Analysis of self-reported problematic tasks of pregnant women. Ergonomics, 2006, 49, 3, 282-292.

Lou S. Z. i wsp. Sit-to-stand at different periods of pregnancy. Clin. Biomech., 2001, 16, 3, 194-198.

Paul J. A., Frings-Dresen M. H. Standing working posture compared in pregnant and non-pregnant conditions. Ergonomics, 1994, 37, 9, 1563-1575.

Nicholls J. A., Grieve D. W. Posture, performance and discomfort in pregnancy. Appl. Ergon., 1992, 23, 2, 128-132.

Masten W. Y., Smith J. L. Reaction time and strength in pregnant and nonpregnant employed women. J. Occup. Med., 1988, 30, 5, 451-456.

Ribas S. I., Guirro E. C. O. Analise da pressao plantar e do eqilibro postural em diferentes fases da gestacao./Analysis of plantar pressure and postural balance during different phases of pregnancy. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia / Brazilian J. Phys. Ther., 2007, 11, 5, 391-397.

Jang J. i wsp. Balance (perceived and actual) and preferred stance width during pregnancy. Clin. Biomech., 2008, 23, 4, 468-476.

Butler E. E. i wsp. Postural equilibrium during pregnancy: decreased stability with an increased reliance on visual cues. Am J. Ogstet. Gynecol., 2006, 195, 4, 1104-1108.

Nyska M. i wsp. Plantar foot pressures in pregnant women. Isr. J. Med. Sci., 1997, 33, 2, 139-146.

Lymbery J. K., Gilleard W. The stance phase of walking during pregnancy: temporospatial and ground reaction force variables. J. Am Podiatr. Med. Assoc., 2005, 95, 3, 247-253.

Bird A. R. i wsp. The effect of pregnancy on footprint parameters. A prospective investigation. J. Am Podiatr. Med. Assoc., 1999, 89, 8, 405-409.

Foti T. i wsp. A biomechanical analysis of gait during pregnancy. J. Bone Joint Surg., 2000, 82, 5, 625-633.

Wu W. i wsp. Gait coordination in pregnancy: transverse pelvic and thoracic rotations and their relative phase. Clin. Biomech., 2004, 19, 5, 480-488.

Physiotherapy

The Journal of University of Physical Education in Wroclaw

Journal Information


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.101


Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 367 367 150
PDF Downloads 129 129 67