Economic Aspects of Manure Management and Practices for Sustainable Agriculture in Turkey

Open access


Turkish livestock sector plays very important role in the Turkish GDP and the use of manure affects the environment but the farming sector want the farmers to employ the use of more integrated manure practice. The study assessed the economic impacts of integrated manure and chemical fertilizer used and the manure management practices sustainable for Turkish agriculture. Turkey is dependent on foreign countries not only for energy but for chemical fertilizers raw materials. High price of chemical fertilizers is one of the negative impact, manure substitution will lead to stable macro-economy, and environmental friendly economy and agricultural productivity will also impacts. To achieve these impacts, some manure practices suitable for sustainable rural development in Turkey was assessed.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Araji A. Abdo Z. Joyse P. (2001). Efficient use of animal manure on croplandeconomic analysis. Bioresour Technol 79(2): 179–191.

  • Asai M. Langer V. Frederiksen P. (2014). Responding to environmental regulations through collaborative arrangements: Social aspects of manure partnerships in Denmark. Livest Sci. 167: 370–380.

  • Barker J. Hodges S. Walls F. (2005). Livestock manure production rates and nutrient content. North Carolina agricultural chemicals manual. Chapter X- Fertilizer Use. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences . NC State University

  • Casey K.D. Bicudo J.R. Schmidt D.R. et al. (2006). Air quality and emissions from livestock and poultry production/waste management systems. In: Rice J.M. Caldwell D.F. Humenik F.J. (Eds.) Animal Agriculture and the Environment: National Center for Manure and Waste Management White Papers. ASABE p. 40.

  • D’Haene K. Magyar M. De N.A. et al. (2007). Nitrogen and phosphorus balances of Hungarian farms. Eur J Agron 26: 224–234.

  • De Clercq P. Gertsis A. Hofman G. et al. (2001). Nutrient Management Legislation in European Countries.The Netherlands: Wageningen Press 347 pp.

  • EPDK (2015). Republic of Turkey energy market regulatory authority. <> Website. Accessed 11 December 2015

  • Erkmen J. Özdemir N. (2012). Applicability of the Contract Farming Model in Promoting the Use of Organic Fertilizer via Biogas-Unit Dairy and Fattening Farms The Black Sea Journal of Science 2 (6): 27-38

  • Erkus A. Bulbul M. Kiral T. (1995). Agricultural Economics. Agricultural Economics (in Turkish). Agricultural Faculty of Ankara University Press Ankara.

  • FAOSTAT (2013). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ResourceSTAT-Fertilizer. < >Website. Accessed 15 October 2015

  • Ghosh N. (2004). Reducing dependence on chemical fertilizers and its financial implications for farmers in India. Ecol. Econ. 49(2): 149–162.

  • Goncagul T. (2003). Farm animal diversity in Turkey in OECD agriculture and biodiversity: Developing indicators for policy analysis Paris France. indicators Website. Accessed 12 July 2015

  • MFAL (2015). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Food Agriculture and Livestock. <> Website. Accessed 09 August 2015

  • Kacar B. (1997). Fertilizer Knowledge. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publication: Nobel Publication No 1490 Book s. 1-441. s.57 Ankara.

  • Kacar B. Katkat V. ( 2009). Fertilizers and Fertilization Techniques. Nobel Publication No : 1119 Third Press p.17-54. Ankara

  • Karyotis T. Gucdemir I. Akgul S. (2014). Nitrogen fertilization plans for the main crops of Turkey to mitigate nitrates pollution. Eurasian J.Soil Sci 3: 13–24.

  • Kizilaslan H. Onurlubas H. (2010). Potential of production of biogas from animal origin waste in Turkey (Tokat Provincial Example). J Anim Vet Adv 9: 1083–1087.

  • Komiyama T. Kobayashi A. Yahag M. (2012). The chemical characteristics of ashes from cattle swine and poultry manure. J Mater Cycles Waste 15(1):106-110

  • Ksawery K. Tjalfe G.P. Gitte H.R. Peter S. (2010). Plant-availability to barley of phosphorus in ash from thermally treated animal manure in comparison to other manure based materials and commercial fertilizer. Eur J Agron (33):293–303

  • LIFE (2006). A guide on exploitation of agricultural residues in Turkey agro-waste-exploitation of agricultural residues in Turkey project. EU- Life Programme Project Project No: LIFE03 TCY/TR/000061.

  • MARA (2006). Fertilizers and fertilization guide of Turkey Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affaires. General Directorate of Agricultural Research. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute Directorate Ankara.

  • Monteny G.J. Groenestein C.M. Hilhorst M.A. (2001). Interactions and coupling between emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from animal husbandry. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 60 123–132.

  • Nowak P. Shepard. R. Madison F. (1998). Farmers and Manure Management: A critical Analysis. In: Animal Waste Utilization: Effective Use of Manure as a Soil Resource: Hatfield J.L. Stewart B.A. EDs.; Ann Arbor Pres: Chelsea Michigan pp.1-32.

  • OECD (2008). Environmental performance of agriculture in OECD countries since 1990 Paris France. << Website. Accessed 25 June 2015

  • Oskam A.A. Burrel T Temel S. et al. (2004). Turkey in the European Union Consequences for Agriculture Food Rural Areas and Structural Policy. Wageningen University Netherland pp: 1-253.

  • Pagliari P. Rosen C. Strock J. et al. (2010). Phosphorus availability and early corn growth response in soil amended with Turkey manure ash. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. (41):1369–1382.

  • Pellervo K Lehtonen H. Rintamäki H. et al. (2013). Economics of manure logistics separation and land application. Baltic Forum for Innovative Technologies for Sustainable Manure Management. Baltic Sea Region Programme of the European Union 2007-2013. Knowledge Report. p.33.

  • Rojas-Downing M.M. Nejadhashemi A.P. Harrigan T. et al. (2017). Climate change and livestock: Impacts adaptation and mitigation. Clim. Risk Manag (16) : 145–163

  • SPO (2000). Special Commission Report on Fertilizers. Eighth Five Year Development Plan State Planning Organization Publications No. 2514-SCR: 531 pp. 88. Ankara Turkey.

  • Steinfeld H. Gerber P. Wassenaar T. et al. (2006). Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. FAO Rome

  • Swensson C. (2003). Analyses of mineral element balances between 1997 and 1999 from dairy farms in the south of Sweden. Eur J Agron 20 (1): 63–69.

  • Tittonell P. Rufino M.C. Janssen B. et al. (2010). Carbon and nutrient losses from manure stored under traditional and improved practices in smallholder crop-livestock systems: Evidence from Kenya. Plant and Soil 328. 1-2: 253–269.

  • Tunney H. Csath P. Ehlert P. (2003). Approaches to calculating P balance at the field-scale in Europe. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166: 438–446

  • TURKSTAT (2015). Turkish Statistical Institute. < http://tuikapp.tuik> Website. Accessed 22 September 2015

  • Unterschultz R. Jeffrey R. (2001). Economic evaluation of manure management and farm gate applications. Edmonton Canada.

  • Vervaet M. Lauwers L. Lenders S. et al. (2005). Effectiveness of nitrate policy in Flanders (1990-2003): Modular modelling and response analysis. In The XIth European Association of Agricultural Economists. Copenhagen Denmark.

  • Yilmaz H. (2003). Fertilizer in Turkish agriculture: Policies and economic analysis of fertilizer subsidy. Department of agricultural economics institute of natural and applied Sciences University of Çukurova PhD Dissertation Adana Turkey.

  • Yilmaz H. Demircan V. Gul M. (2010). Examining of chemical fertilizer use levels in terms of agriculture environment relations and economic losses in the agricultural farms: The case of Isparta Turkey. Bulg J Agric Sci 16: 143–157.

  • Yilmaz H. Koknaroglu H. Demircan V. (2009). Economics of manure use as fertilizer in crop production engaged also in beef cattle Farms in Turkey. J Anim Vet Adv. 8(5): 843–852.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 38 38 6
PDF Downloads 41 41 4