Impact of corporate social responsibility on sustainable enterprise development

Open access

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a recent entry in the economy of modern enterprise both at global level and for Romanian companies. CSR adds a new dimension to the enterprise’s performance in the social fields, contributing to the sustainable development of economic entities. CSR components are included in an international standard – ISO 26000. The paper presents authors’ experience in implementing this standard. Possible steps of a roadmap for CSR implementation:

  • Top management endorsement and nomination of a complex CSR team
  • Developing formal company CSR policy documents
  • Selecting and engaging the company’s stakeholders as early as possible.
  • Building a Project Advisory Board – useful in every modern managerial tool application should guide the progress toward CSR.
  • An external facilitator would help solve internal conflicts.
  • An audit of what CSR represents for the Company, what are the CSR options, e.g., promoting a “green company” profile, what would be the best impact of philanthropy and community volunteering, etc.
  • Generate a CSR portfolio of actions, setting deadlines, responsibilities and allocating resources, establishing communication, reporting, monitoring and corrective procedures
  • upgrading the sustainable enterprise strategy.

The authors experience led to the following conclusions:

  1. Critical relevance of top management involvement
  2. Stakeholders contacted as soon as possible in the process
  3. The Project Advisory Board legitimates the actions taken under the mainframe of CSR
  4. Aligning CSR polices to every other policy in the Company and make a system of coherent documents from ISO 9001, 14001, 18001, and 26000 that should work in a holistic manner. Focal company operates in municipal services having constant contact with all stakeholders.

The paper substantiates a previous work that analysed modern managerial tools.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ISO 26000 (2016) see the last developments at the portal http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/iso26000.htm accessed Sep 20 2016

  • EU-CSR (2011) COM(2011)-681: A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility European Commission http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0681&from=EN retrieved August 2 2015

  • Responsible Care (2016) http://www.icca-chem.org/en/Home/Responsible-care/ accessed Oct14 2016

  • CSR-Romania (2015) Studiu privind implicarea companiilor din Romania in activitati de “Responsabilitate Sociala Corporatista http://centras.tree.ro/assets/upload/File/Raport%20RSC.docretrieved Sep 21 2016

  • Hohnen P. (2007) Corporate Social Responsibility: An Implementation Guide for Business International Institute for Sustainable Development Winnipeg Canada

  • Werther W.B.Jr. and Chandler D. (2006) Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Sage Publications Thousand Oaks California United States

  • GRI (2015) Global Reporting Initiative https://www.globalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx accessed October 19 2016

  • The Balanced Scorecard Institute (2016) http://balancedscorecard.org/ accessed October 19 2016

  • Danubianu Mirela and C. Teodorescu (2016) Managerial Tools and Sustainable Development PESD 10(1) 2016 pp 151-160

  • Teodorescu C. et al. (2011) Applying Life Cycle Analysis Of Industrial Products To Macroeconomic Level Paper #II-O-20 presented at the International Symposium “The Environment and the Industry” SIMI-2011 organized by ECOIND – Bucharest.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1950 1451 63
PDF Downloads 1155 960 21