Tertullian on the Trinity

  • 1 Moody Bible Institute, , Chicago


Tertullian is often portrayed as a prescient figure who accurately anticipated the Nicene consensus about the Trinity. But when he is examined against the background of his immediate predecessors, he falls into place as a typical second-century Logos theologian. He drew especially from Theophilus of Antioch, Justin Martyr, and Irenaeus of Lyons. At the same time, Tertullian did introduce some important innovations. His trinitarian language of ‘substance’ and ‘person’, rooted in Stoic metaphysics, offered the church a new way to be monotheistic while retaining the full deity and consubstantiality of the Word. Tertullian also significantly developed the concept of a divine oikonomia, God’s plan to create and redeem the world. The Son and Spirit are emissaries of the Father’s will—not ontologically inferior to him, yet ranked lower in the way that the sent are always subordinate to the sender. For this reason, Tertullian denied that a Father/Son relationship was eternal within the Trinity, seeing it rather as a new development emerging from God’s plan to make the world. Such temporal paternity and filiation distances Tertullian from the eventual Nicene consensus, which accepted instead the eternal generation theory of Origen. While Tertullian did propose some important terms that would gain traction among the Nicene fathers, he was also marked by a subordinationist tendency that had affinities with Arianism. Tertullian’s most accurate anticipation of Nicaea was his insistence on three co-eternal and consubstantial Persons. Historical theologians need to start admitting that Tertullian was a far cry from being fully Nicene. Rather, he offered a clever but still imperfect half-step toward what would become official orthodoxy..

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allison GR (2011) Historical Theology: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

  • Anatolios K (2011) Retrieving Nicaea: The Development and Meaning of Christian Doctrine. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

  • Athanasius (1971) Against the Nations. In Thomson RW (ed) Athanasius: Contra Gentes and De Incarnatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Bauer W, Gingrich FW, and Danker FW (1979) A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 2nd edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Brent A (1995) Hippolytus and the Roman Church in the Third Century: Communities in Tension before the Emergence of a Monarch Bishop (Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 31). Leiden: Brill.

  • Dünzl F (2007) A Brief History of the Doctrine of the Trinity in the Early Church, Bowden J (trans). London: T&T Clark.

  • Gregg RC and Groh DE (1981) Early Arianism: A View of Salvation. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.

  • Gregory of Nyssa (1975) On the Difference between Ousia and Hypostasis. In Wiles M and Santer M (eds) Documents in Early Christian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Harnack A von (1897) History of Dogma, Buchanan N (trans), volume 3 (Theological Translation Library). Boston, MA: Roberts Brothers.

  • Hillar M (2012) From Logos to Trinity: The Evolution of Religious Beliefs from Pythagoras to Tertullian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Holmes SR (2012) The Quest for the Trinity: The Doctrine of God in Scripture, History and Modernity. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.

  • Irenaeus (1994) Against Heresies. In Roberts A and Donaldson J (eds) The Ante-Nicene Fathers, volume 1. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.

  • Justin Martyr (1997) Second Apology. In Barnard LW (ed) St. Justin Martyr: The First and Second Apologies (Ancient Christian Writers 56). New York, NY: Paulist.

  • Justin Martyr (2003) Dialogue with Trypho. In Falls TB (ed) St. Justin Martyr: Dialogue with Trypho (revised Halton T and Slusser M). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

  • Kittel G and Friedrich G (1985) Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Bromiley G (ed). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

  • Lampe GWH (1976) A Patristic Greek Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • McGowan A (2006) Tertullian and the ‘Heretical’ Origins of the ‘Orthodox’ Trinity. Journal of Early Christian Studies 14(4): 437-457.

  • McGrath A (1998) Historical Theology: An Introduction to the History of Christian Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Moingt J (1966) Théologie trinitaire de Tertullien, volume 1 (Théologie 68). Paris: Aubier.

  • Osborn E (2001) Irenaeus of Lyons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Olson RE (1999) The Story of Christian Theology: Twenty Centuries of Tradition & Reform. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.

  • Rankin D (2001) Tertullian’s Vocabulary of the Divine ‘Individuals’ in ad-versus Praxean. Sacris Erudiri 40(*): 5-46.

  • Rist J (1969) Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Socrates Scholasticus (1995) Church History. In Schaff P and Wace H (eds) Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, volume 2. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.

  • Tertullian (1948) Against Praxeas. In Evans E (ed) Tertullian’s Treatise Against Praxeas. London: SPCK.

  • Tertullian (1954) Against Praxeas. In Kroymann A and Evans E (eds) Tertulliani Opera: Opera Montanistica (Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina 2). Turnhout: Brepols.

  • Theophilus of Antioch (1994) To Autolycus. In Roberts A and Donaldson J (eds) The Ante-Nicene Fathers, volume 2. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.


Journal + Issues