Loftier Doctrine: The use of Scripture in Justin Martyr’S Second Apology

Open access

Abstract

Over the past century many scholars have questioned integrity and composition of Justin Martyr’s Second Apology. One frequent criticism is that Justin quotes from a variety of sources in Greco- Roman philosophy, but never once quotes scripture. As a result scholars assume that the Second Apology reveals Justin’s real indebtedness to philosophy that diverges from his broader theological and scriptural concerns expressed in his other works. This article challenges these notions by arguing that scripture is essential Justin’s Second Apology and that the lack of any extended quotations of scripture is no basis to disparage his theological perspective. Careful analysis of Justin’s Second Apology demonstrates that he regularly appeals to the authority of scripture and provides numerous echoes and allusions to scriptural passages. Furthermore, in terms of his theological framework, these echoes and allusions are actually more important than mere quotations. They demonstrate that Justin does not simply quote scripture, but absorbs the scriptural content and applies it to particular theological debates and particular issues of Christian practice.

References

  • Aune, D (1966) Justin Martyr’s use of the Old Testament. Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 9(4): 179-197.

  • Barnard, LM (1997) St. Justin Martyr the First and Second Apologies. New York, NY: Paulist Press.

  • Barnard, LM (1964) The Old Testament and Judaism in the Writings of Justin Martyr. Vetus Testamentum 14(4): 395-406.

  • Bellinzoni, AJ (1967) The Sayings of Jesus in the Writings of Justin Martyr. Leiden: Brill.

  • Bingham, DJ (2000) Justin and Isaiah 53. Vigiliae Christianae 54(3): 248-261.

  • Buck, PL (2002) The Pagan Husband in Justin, 2 Apology 2:1-20. Journal of Theological Studies 53(2): 541-546.

  • Buck, PL (2003) Justin Martyr’s Apologies: Their Number, Destination, and Form. Journal of Theological Studies 54(1): 45-59.

  • Chilton, B (2008) Early Christian Interpretation: The Case of Justin Martyr. In Neusner, J and Chilton, BD and Levine BA (eds) Torah Revealed, Torah Fulfilled: Scriptural Laws In Formative Judaism and Earliest Christianity. New York, NY: T&T Clark.

  • Chilton, B (2009) Justin and Israelite Prophecy. In Parvis, S and Foster, P (eds) Justin Martyr and His World. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.

  • Cosgrove, C (1982) Justin Martyr and the Emerging Christian Canon: Observations on the Purpose and Destination of the Dialogue with Trypho. Vigiliae Christianae 36(3): 209-232.

  • Davis, M (2011) The Soul of the Greeks: An Inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Ehrhardt, A (1953) Justin Martyr’s Two Apologies. Journal of Ecclesiastical History 4(1): 1-12.

  • Eusebius (2009) Ecclesiastical History. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.

  • Grant, RM (1985) A Woman of Rome: The Matron in Justin, 2 Apology 2.1-9. Church History 54(4): 461-472.

  • Grant, R (1986) Forms and Occasions of the Greek Apologists. Studi e Materiali di Storia delle Religioni 52: 213-26.

  • Grant, R (1988) Greek Apologists of the Second Century. London: SCM Press.

  • Hill, CE (2007) Was John’s Gospel among Justin’s Apostolic Memoirs? In Parvis, S and Foster, P (eds) Justin Martyr and His World. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.

  • Holte, R (1958) Logos Spermatikos: Christianity and Ancient Philosophy according to St. Justin’s Apologies. Studia Theologica 12(2): 109-68.

  • Jennings, N (2010) Theology as Ascetic Act: Disciplining Christian Discourse. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

  • Liddell, HG and Scott, R (1996) A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Marcovich, M (1994) Iustini Martyris Apologiae pro Christianis. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Minns, D (2010) The Text of Justin’s Apologies. Studia Patristica 45: 355-360.

  • Minns, D and Parvis, P (2009) Justin, Philosopher and Martyr: Apologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Munier, C (1987) A Propos des Apologies de Justin. Revue des Sciences Religieuses 61: 177-86.

  • Munier, C (2006) Justin Apologie pour Les Chrétiens: Introduction, Texte Critique, Traduction et Notes. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.

  • Parvis, P (2001) The Textual Tradition of Justin’s Apologies: A Modest Proposal. Studia Patristica 36: 54-60.

  • Parvis, P (2007) Justin, Philosopher and Martyr: The Posthumous Creation of the Second Apology. In Parvis, S and Foster, P (eds) Justin Martyr and His World. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.

  • Pryor, JW (1992) Justin Martyr and the Fourth Gospel. Second Century 9(3): 153-169.

  • Porter, SE (2007) Further Comments on the Use of the Old Testament in the New Testament. In Broder, TL; MacDonald, DR and Porter, SE (eds) The Intertextuality of the Epistles: Explorations of Theory and Practice. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.

  • Porter, S (2008) Allusions and Echoes. In Porter, SE and Stanley, CD (eds) As It Is Written: Studying Paul’s Use of Scripture. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.

  • Skarsaune, O (1987) The Proof from Prophecy: A Study in Justin Martyr +s Proof Text Tradition Text-Type, Provenance, Theological Profile. Leiden: Brill.

  • Skarsaune, O (2007) Justin and His Bible. In Parvis, S and Foster, P (eds) Justin Martyr and His World. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.

  • Shotwell, WA (1965) The Biblical Exegesis of Justin Martyr. London: SPCK.

  • Thorsteinsson, R (2012) The Literary Genre and Purpose of Justin’s Second Apology: A Critical Review with Insights from Ancient Epistolography. Harvard Theological Review 105(1): 91-114.

  • Tull Willey, P (1997) Remember the Former Things: The Recollection of Previous Texts in Second Isaiah. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.

  • Verheyden, J (2012) Justin’s Text of the Gospels: Another Look at the Citations in 1 Apol. 15.1-8. In Hill, CE and Kruger, MJ (eds) The Early Text of the New Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Perichoresis

The Theological Journal of Emanuel University

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.101
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.375

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 36 36 29
PDF Downloads 7 7 5