This article examines Athanasius’ argument in his work Contra Arianos, focusing on the reasons for the order in which he addresses the biblical texts he considers. While the choice of which texts to discuss is dictated by the need to consider those texts that were evidently important in the Arians’ own exegetical arguments, the order in which Athanasius discusses them derives from his desire to begin with biblical texts that clearly describe the whole sweep of biblical redemption. Texts such as Philippians 2:5-11 and Hebrews 1-2 describe in some detail the movements of humiliation and exaltation which the Son undergoes as he becomes man, and thus these texts demonstrate the need to apply any given assertion about the Son either to his eternal existence as God or to his temporal existence as man. In such texts, the literary context-the subject of the passage itself-explicitly describes the broader redemptive context. As a result, these texts constitute the starting point from which to develop interpretive principles applicable to other biblical texts in which the redemptive context is not as obvious. The article concludes with reflection on the significance of Athanasius’ starting point: the story of redemption begins not with the Gospels or even with Genesis 1, but with the eternal relationship of Father to Son, a relationship we were created to share and redeemed that we might share it anew.
Athanasius (1980) Against the Arians 1. The Trinitarian Controversy. In Rusch, WG (ed), Sources of Early Christian Thought. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1980.
Athanasius (1994) Against the Arians 2.1-25, 3.42-67. In Schaff, P and Wace, H (eds) A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 4. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, Reprint 1994.
Athanasius (1998) Contra Arianos 1-2. In Metzler, K and Savvidis, K (eds) Athanasius: Werke, Band I. Die Dogmatischen Schriften, Erster Teil, 2. Lieferung, 109-260. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Athanasius (2000) Contra Arianos 3. In Metzler, K and Savvidis, K (eds) Athanasius: Werke, Band I. Die Dogmatischen Schriften, Erster Teil, 3. Lieferung, 305-381. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Anatolios, K (2006) When was God without Wisdom? Trinitarian Hermeneutics and Rhetorical Strategy in Athanasius. Studia Patristica 41:117-123.
Behr, J (2004). The Nicene Faith: Formation of Christian Theology, volume 2. New York, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
Beirne, MM (2013) St Athanasius and the Scriptures, Exemplified in his Letter to Marcellinus. Phronema 28: 89-106.
Boulos, WHK (2001) St. Athanasius’ Doctrine of Grace in Contra Arianos I. Studia Patristica 36: 477-481.
Ernest, JD (1993) Athanasius of Alexandria: The Scope of Scripture in Polemical and Pastoral Context. Vigiliae Christianae 47(4): 341-362.
Ernest, JD (2001) Athanasian Scripture Citations. Studia Patristica 36: 502-508.
Ernest, JD (2004) The Bible in Athanasius of Alexandria. Leiden: Brill.
Gonnett, D (1997) L’Utilisation Christologique de l’Épître aux Hébreux dans les Orationes Contra Arianos d’Athanase d’Alexandrie. Studia Patristica 32: 19-24.
Gregg, RC and Groh, DE (1981) Early Arianism: A View of Salvation. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.
Sumner, D (2012) The Instrumentalization of Christ’s Human Nature. Studia Patristica 52: 129-138.
Torrance, TF (1995) The Hermeneutics of Athanasius. In Divine Meaning: Studies in Patristic Hermeneutics. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
Kannengiesser, C (1982) Holy Scripture and Hellenistic Hermeneutics in Alexandrian Christology: The Arian Crisis. Berkeley, CA: Center for Hermeneutical Studies in Hellenistic and Modern Culture.
Treier, DJ (2011) Proverbs and Ecclesiastes [Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible]. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos.
Twomey, V (1995) Saint Athanasius: De synodis and the Sense of Scripture. In Scriptural Interpretation in the Fathers, 85-118. Dublin: Four Courts Press.