Restitution in the context of institutional lock-in

Open access


This article presents the problem of lack of restitution in Poland in the political, social and economic context. The author presents the theory of institutional lock-in, referring to the hitherto course of the political, social and economic transformation processes in Poland. She is focusing on the research problem in form of an institutional lock-in on the route to general restitution process. The author examines the path shaping and path dependence to understand the current negative attitude toward restitution presented by the government and society. The author also indicates the costs caused by lack of restitution. Through analysis of past attempts of restitution regulations the author indicates the most important flashpoints. A hypothesis constructed by the author focuses on the negative effects of institutional lock-in, lack of restitution increases transaction costs influencing the Polish economy. The study is based on the legal documents and the results of public opinion polls.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aoki M. (2001). Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press

  • Appel H. (2005). Anti-Communist Justice and Funding the Post-Communist Order: Lustration and Restitution in Central Europe East European Politics and Societies 19 379-405.

  • Calhoun N. (2004). Dilemmas of Justice in Eastern Europe’s Democratic Transitions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Chodakiewicz M. Currell D. (2003). Restytucja: The Problems of Property Restitution in Poland (1939-2001). In: Chodakiewicz M. J. Radziłowski J. Tolczyk D. (Eds.). Poland’s Transformation: A Work in Progress Charlott esville VA: Leopolis Press.

  • Czapiński J. Panek T. (Eds.) (2006) Diagnoza społeczna 2005 Warszawa: Vizja Press&It.

  • Czapiński J (2006). Polska państwo bez społeczeństwa Nauka 1 p. 7-25.

  • Eggertson T. 1996 A note on the economics of institutions. In: Alston L.J. Eggertsson T. North D.C. (Eds.). Empirical Studies In Institutional Change. Cambridge New York Melbourne: Cambridge University Press 6-24.

  • Iyer S. Kitson M. Toh B. (2005) Social capital economic growth and regional development. Regional Studies 39 p. 1015-1040.

  • Józefiak C. (1999). Skutki ekonomiczne reprywatyzacji. In: Reprywatyzacja w systemie prawa Lipinska M. (Ed.) Warszawa: Dział Wydawniczy Senatu 31-35.

  • Karklins R. (2005). The system made me do it: Corruption in post-communist societies Armonk NY: M.E. Sharp 2005.

  • Kollmorgen R. (2010). Transformation theory and socio-economic change in Central and Eastern Europe. A conceptual framework Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe no 1.

  • Koźminski A. (1997). Restitution of Private Property: Reprivatization in Central and Eastern Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30:1 P. 95-106.

  • Lerman Z. (1999) Agriculture in ECE and CIS: From Common Heritage to Divergence. Washington DC: The World Bank.

  • Łaszkiewicz K. (1999). Problemy związane z realizacja roszczeń z tytulu utraty własności In: Reprywatyzacja w systemie prawa Lipinska M. (Ed.). Warszawa: Dzial Wydawniczy Senatu 17-26.

  • Myles J. Pierson P. (2001). The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform in: Pierson P. (Ed). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press 305-333.

  • Nielsen K. Jessop B. Hausner J. (1995). Institutional Change in Post-Socialism in: Hausner J. Jessop B. Nielsen K. (Eds.) Strategic Choice and Path-Dependency in Post-Socialism: Institutional Dynamics in the Transformation Process. Aldershot: Edward Elgar 3-44.

  • Olson M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth Stagfl ation and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Riddell J. (2000). Agriculural land leases and the development of eff ective land registration systems In: Csaki C. Lerman Z. (Eds.) Structural Changes in the Farming Sectors of Central and Eastern Europe Washington DC: The World Bank.

  • Vincensini C.(2001). Is path dependence a useful concept to analyse the evolution of ownership structures in Central Europe? A theoretical and empirical discussion Paper prepared for the conference “Institutions in Transition” organised by IMAD Otocec Slovenia 13-14 July 2001.

  • Walsh S. Taff G. (2002). Drivers of Landcover and Landuse Change Associated with Land Restitution Policies in Gauja National Park. Latvia. North Carolina USA: Department of Geography University of North Carolina.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 291 176 9
PDF Downloads 131 85 5