Agricultural knowledge transfer: A case study for small farms and young farmers’ beneficiaries of European funds


Common Agricultural Policy represents the main instrument of the European Union for the development of agriculture and rural areas. European funds are vital for the productivity and competitiveness of agricultural holdings, as well as for the transfer of agricultural knowledge and innovation. Supporting small and young farms is essential for the vitality of rural areas and for the renewal of generations of farmers. The aim of this work is to transfer agricultural knowledge in order to improve the productivity of agricultural holdings, especially among young farmers and small farms. We implemented training program through European funds related to Measure 1. “Actions for knowledge transfer and information actions” from Rural Development Programme of Romania. The characteristic of 100 participants and their responses were analyzed. Most of the participants were young people up to 40 years old (59%). The vast majority of the participants were from the rural area and only 17% were from the urban area. 53% from participants were strongly agree with the fact that level of knowlegde influence farm productivity. Actions for knowledge transfer improve the adaptation of farmers to the new challenges of agriculture, as well as productivity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bandiera, O., Rasul, I., 2006. Social networks and technology adoption in northern Mozambique. The Economic Journal, 116(514), 869-902.

  • Bonfiglio, A., Camaioni, B., Coderoni, S., Esposti, R., Pagliacci, F., Sotte, F., 2017. Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from Rural Development Policy expenditure across the EU space. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 78-87.

  • Davidova, S., 2014. Small and semi-subsistence farms in the EU: significance and development paths, EuroChoices 13, 5-9.

  • Giannakis, E., Bruggeman, A., 2018. Exploring the labour productivity of agricultural systems across European regions: A multilevel approach. Land use policy, 77, 94-106.

  • Giannakis, E., Bruggeman, A., Djuma, H., Kozyra, J., Hammer, J., 2016. Water pricing and irrigation across Europe: opportunities and constraints for adopting irrigation scheduling decision support systems. Water Sci. Technol., 16 (1), 245-252.

  • Gollin, D., 2010. Agricultural productivity and economic growth. In: Pingali,P., Evenson, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 4. Elsevier, Oxford/Amsterdam, 3825-3866.

  • Guiomar, N., Godinho, S., Pinto-Correia, T., Almeida, M., Bartolini, F., Bezák, P., ... & Corazzin, M., 2018. Typology and distribution of small farms in Europe: Towards a better picture, Land use policy, 75, 784-798.

  • Huang, J., Huang, Z., Jia, X., Hu, R., Xiang, C., 2015. Long-term reduction of nitrogen fertilizer use through knowledge training in rice production in China, Agricultural Systems, 135, 105-111.

  • Pan, D., Zhang, N., 2018. The role of agricultural training on fertilizer use knowledge: A randomized controlled experiment, Ecological economics, 148, 77-91.

  • Popescu, G.C., Popescu, M., 2017. Agri-environment measures for promoting romanian sustainable agriculture, International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM: Surveying Geology & mining Ecology Management, 17, 103-110.

  • Pratiwi, A., Suzuki, A., 2017. Effects of farmers’ social networks on knowledge acquisition: lessons from agricultural training in rural Indonesia, Journal of Economic Structures, 6(1), 8.

  • Smit, M. J., van Leeuwen, E. S., Florax, R. J., de Groot, H. L. 2015. Rural development funding and agricultural labour productivity: A spatial analysis of the European Union at the NUTS2 level, Ecological Indicators, 59, 6-18.


Journal + Issues