Organizational learning in developing the integrated quality management


High quality is organizations’ competitive advantage. It is beneficial to base this on professional approach, and basic concepts and definitions with scientific foundation. The necessary main concepts consist of quality, quality management, quality improvement and quality assurance. Organizations’ top management is responsible of the quality management decisions and implementations. The present practical situation is fragmented and the implementations are most often based on the instrumental means of the different methodological schools, which is confusing and detrimental to the understanding and usefulness of the concept of quality management. It is not beneficial to build a special system for quality management by only following the requirements of the general standard. This cannot ensure competitive business advantage. In this article, we present an alternative approach that is a natural practical way to realize quality management as the teleological solution, Quality Integration, in which the general and specific quality concepts, principles and methodology are embedded within the normal business management activities. Our Quality Integration is based on the thinking of organizational learning. Its framework covers both running the current business and improving the overall business performance. This model has been used as the thinking framework in practical organizational cases since 1990’s. As the business circumstances change constantly, the organization must be constantly ready to renew through both small and radical changes. This change also receives resistance, and the development takes place according to a multi-phase process towards the new integration and requires a proper recognition and decisions. Principles of the organizational learning can help organizations in a consistent way. Evaluation of the overall organizational performance is an important quality management practice and should take into account performance enablers (processes) and also the results obtained thereof. In our approach, the evaluation criteria emphasize organizational learning and integration. The external context of the organization has a crucial role in achieving and developing the business objectives. The organization’s strategy can no longer be based on the value chains but on finding ways to alter them radically through value networking. The organization is influenced by the true and all-inclusive reality, which differs from the apparent reality perceived by the senses, and which is only revealed through consciousness. Understanding this reinforces awareness and trust that are important factors also in quality management and quality assurance.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anttila, J., Jussila, K., Kajava, J. 2012. Reinforcing business integration in managing specialized disciplines in organizations, Management system standards viewpoints, The International Symposium on Quality, Solin, Croatia.

  • Anattila, J., Jussila, K. 2018. The role of internal auditing in the development of the organization towards the excellent performance, The 19th International Symposium on Quality, Plitvička jezera Croatia.

  • Anttila, J., Jussila, K. 2017a. Universities and smart cities: The challenges to high quality, The 20th QMOD Conference, Elsinore Denmark.

  • Anttila, J., Jussila, K. 2017b. Out of the crisis of the quality profession: The new renaissance in the quality discipline, IAQ Quality Forum, Bled Slovenia.

  • Anttila, J., Jussila, K. 2017c. ISO 9001:2015 – a questionable reform. What should the implementing organizations understand and do? Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1309119.

  • Anttila, J., Jussila, K. 2017d. Understanding quality – conceptualization of the fundamental concepts of quality, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. 9 Issue: 3/4, DOI:10.1108/IJQSS-03-2017-0020.

  • Anttila, J., Jussila, K. 2013. An advanced insight into managing business processes in practice, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, DOI:10.1080/14783363.2013.791105.

  • Anttila, J., Jussila, K. 2011. From quality management principles to good management principles – Business-integrated approach to quality management, The 8th China Shanghai international symposium on quality and the forum of International Academy for Quality.

  • Anttila, J. 2009a. Business performance self-assessment and criteria ‘3in1’,

  • Anttila, J. 2009b. Self-assessment methodology and criteria ‘3in1 Start’,

  • Brown, S., Eisenhardt, K. 1998. Competing on the edge. Strategy as structured chaos, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, USA.

  • Butcher, D., Harvey, P., Atkinson, S. 1997. Developing businesses through developing individuals, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield England.

  • Christensen, C. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma, Harvard Business School Press.

  • Deming, W.E. 1993. The new economics for industry, government, education, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, MA USA.

  • EFQM 2017.

  • ISO Central Office 1994. Press release July 14, 1994, ISO Geneva, Switzerland.

  • ISO/IEC 2012. Directives, part 1, Consolidated ISO supplement – procedures specific to ISO, Annex SL, proposals for management system standards, Geneva Switzerland.

  • ISO/IEC 2011. ISO/IEC 29100 Information technology - Security techniques - Privacy framework, ISO, Geneva Switzerland.

  • ISO 2018. ISO 9004, Quality management - Quality of an organization - Guidance to achieve sustained success, ISO Geneva, Switzerland.

  • ISO 2015. ISO 9000, Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary, ISO Geneva, Switzerland.

  • ISO 2015. ISO 9001 quality management systems – requirements, Geneva Switzerland.

  • ISO 2009. ISO 31000 risk management - principles and guidelines, Geneva Switzerland.

  • Kuisma, M., Seppänen, P. 2015. Suomen suurimmat bisnesmokat - tarinoita huippujohtamisesta, (The biggest business blunders in Finland – Stories of the high level of management). Kustannusosakeyhtiö Siltala, Finland.

  • Niiniluoto, I. 1999. Critical Scientific Realism, Oxford University Press.

  • NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology) 2011. 2013-2014 Baldrige criteria for performance excellence, NIST, Washington USA.

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N. 2000. SECI, Ba, and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long range planning 33, Pergamon.

  • OECD 2002. Guidelines for the security of information systems and networks - Towards a culture of security, OECD, Paris France.

  • OIML (International Organization of Legal Metrology) 2010. V 2-200, International vocabulary of metrology, Geneva Switzerland.

  • Paris, C. 2016. Surviving ISO 9001:2015, Oxebridge Quality Resources International LLC, USA.

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N. 2000. SECI, Ba, and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation, Long range planning 33, Pergamon.

  • Peterson, C., Seligman, M. 2004. Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Pres. Oxford UK.

  • Popper, K. 1978. Three worlds, The Tanner lecture on human values, Delivered at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978.

  • Porter, M. 2008. The five competitive forces that shape strategy, Harvard Business Review, January 2008.

  • Saraiva, P., Andersen, B., Sörqvist, L., Watson, G. 2015. Structured improvement for the 21st century: A new model for Europe. IAQ 2015 World Quality Forum, Budapest Hungary.

  • Senge, P., Roberts, C., Ross, B., Kleiner, A. 1995. The fifth discipline fieldbook, Nicholas Brealey Publishing Limited, London, UK.

  • Senge, P. 1990. The fifth discipline, Doubleday, USA.

  • Tosey, P., Visser, M., Saunders, M. 2012. The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: A critical review, Management Learning 43(3), DOI: 10.1177/1350507611426239.


Journal + Issues