Incentive System in Hungarian High Performance Sport

Open access

Abstract

This study will attempt to describe the role of existing incentives which have a significant effect on Hungarian sport's performance. The aim of the paper is to understand why a large gap has emerged between successful elite sports and the popular but underperforming spectacular sport. According to the concept of dual competition, in addition to sport results, the analyzed fields also concern competition for resources, particularly for the attention of supporters and sponsors. The methodology of the analysis is fundamentally economic in nature; however, qualitative methods are also given emphasis, as the analyzed topic has specific characteristics. Based on new institutional economics, the study presumes that the behavior of organizations is determined by the decisions of bounded rational individuals, and highlights the significance of the created mechanisms and institutions.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • András K. (2003). Üzleti elemek a sportban a labdarúgás példáján /Business elements in sports through example of football./ Unpublished PhD thesis Budapest University of Economic Sciences and Public Administration Budapest Hungary.

  • Andreff W. (1996). Economic environment of sport: a comparison between Western Europe and Hungary. European Journal for Sport Management (EJSM) 2(2) 23-35.

  • De Bosscher V. Bingham J. Shibli S. Van Bottenburg M. & De Knop P. (2008). The global Sporting Arms Race. An international comparative study on sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Aachen Germany: Meyer & Meyer Sport.

  • Kornai J. (1985). Contradictions and Dilemmas. Budapest: Corvina and Cambridge UK: MIT Press 1986.

  • Eggertsson T. (1990). Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Akerlof G.A. & Shiller R.J. (2009). Animal Spirit: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton USA: Princeton University Press.

  • Gintis H. (2009). The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences. Princeton USA: Princeton University Press.

  • Gulyás E. (2013). Modelling the competitiveness of the Hungarian sport. In EASM Conference September 11-15 Istanbul Turkey.

  • Laki L. (2011). Elöszó. Sport az újkapitalizmusban /Preface. Sport in new capitalism/. In T. Sterbenz & G. Szöts (Eds.) Sportágak versenye / Competition of Sports/ (pp. 6-17). Budapest: MSTT.

  • Lazar E.P. (1995). Personnel Economics. Cambridge USA: MIT Press.

  • Milgrom P. & Roberts J. (1992). Economics Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

  • Miller G.J. (1993). Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Simon A.H. (2000). Administrative Behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization.New York USA: The Free Press.

  • Sterbenz T. (2003). Sportmenedzseri döntések /Sport managerial decisions/. Vezetéstudomány 34(6) 25.

  • Sterbenz T. Géczi G. (Eds.) (2012). Sportmenedzsment/Sport management/. TF jegyzet Budapest Hungary: TF.

  • Sterbenz T. Gulyás E. (2014). Lyukas piramis /Hollowed pyramid/. Vezetéstudomány (45)1 24. - 30.

  • Sterbenz T. & Szöts G. (2011). Sportágak versenye /Competition of sports/. Budapest Hungary: MSTT.

  • Szymanski S. (2009). Playbooks and Checkbooks. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

Suche
Zeitschrifteninformation
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.3

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.201
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.333

Cited By
Metriken
Gesamte Zeit Letztes Jahr Letzte 30 Tage
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 320 169 11
PDF Downloads 115 70 7