Cyborgsportpersons: Between Disability and Enhancement

Open access

Abstract

The cyborgization of sport has occupied a noticeable role in the fields of sport and medicine in recent years due to the fact that this issue calls into question the very foundations of contemporary sport. As a result, it gives rise to doubt about whether cyborg athletes should be able to take part in different athletic competitions, and if they are allowed, under what circumstances. After examining the impact of enhancing implants and prosthesis in sport, I have considered which objections can be raised to this particular sort of enhancement. In this regard, I think that several aspects have to be taken into account: 1. The possibility of producing severe harm to the athletes; 2. The effect it has on equality among athletes when the improvement grants an obvious advantage; 3. The dehumanization of sport, and 4. The aesthetic problem My position has been to temper the “moral panic” that some may feel given the progressive (and future) use of enhancing implants and prosthesis as used by (cyborg)athletes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adelson E. (2011)."Let ‘em play" ESPN Magazine. Retrieved 25.02.2013 from http://sports.espn.go.com/ espnmag/story?id=3357051).

  • Bostrom N. (2003). Human Genetic Enhancements: A transhumanist Perspective. Journal of Value Inquiry 37(4) 493-506.

  • Butryn T.D. (2003). Posthuman Podiums: Cyborg Narrative of Elite Track and Field Athletes. Sociology of SportJournal 20 17-39.

  • Camporesi S. (2008). Oscar Pistorius enhancement and post-humans. Journal of Medical Ethics 34(9) 639.

  • Caplan A. (2008). Blade Runner’ Ruling Subverts Nature of Sport: Artificial Legs Would Make for Artificial Competition at Beijing Olympics MSNBC.com May 22 2008 Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/ 24758518/ Culbertson L. (2007). “Human-ness” “dehumanisation” and performance enhancement. Sport Ethics and Philosophy 1(2) 195-217.

  • Dvorsky G. (2007). Is the world ready for cyborg athletes? 25 April 2007. Retrieved 14.07.2008 from http://ieet.org/ index.php/IEET/more/dvorsky20070425.

  • Edwards S.D. (2008). Should Oscar Pistorius Be Excluded From the 2008 Olympic Games? Sports Ethics andPhilosophy 2(2) 112-125.

  • Fukuyama F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnologicaly Revolution. London: Profile Books.

  • Greely H. T. (2004). Disabilities Enhancements and the Meanings of Sports. Stan L & Pol'y Rev 15 99-155.

  • Hoberman J. (1992). Mortal Engines. The Science of Performance and the Dehumanization of Sport. New York: The Free Press.

  • King M. (2011). A league of their own? Evaluating justifications for the division of sport into “enhanced” and “unenhanced” leagues. Sport Ethics and Philosophy 5(4) 31-45.

  • Longman J. (2007). An amputee sprinter: is he disabled or too-abled? The New York Times 15 May.

  • McNamee M. Edwards S.D. (2006). Medical Technology and Slippery Slopes. Journal of Medical Ethics 32(9) 513-518.

  • Marcellini A. Ferez S. Issanchou D. De Léséleuc E. McNamee M. (2012). Challenging human and sporting boundaries: The case of Oscar Pistorius. Performance Enhancement & Health 1(1) 3-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.peh. 2011.11.002.

  • Miah A. (2004). Genetically modified athletes. London-New York: E&FN Spon (Routledge).

  • Sandel M. (2003). The Case Against Perfectionism. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Savulescu J. (2007). Gene therapy transgenesis and chimeras: is the radical genetic alteration of human beings a threat to our humanity? In J. Savulescu (Ed.) Quest of Ethical Wisdom: How the Practical Ethics of East and West Contributeto Wisdom (pp. 3-20). Oxford: Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics.

  • Savulescu J. Foddy B. Clayton M. (2004). Why We Should Allow Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sport. Britishjournal of sports medicine 38 666-670.

  • Schneider A. Rupert J. (2009). Constructing Winners: The Science and Ethics of Genetically Manipulating Athletes. Journal of Philosophy of Sport 36(2) 182-206.

  • Schneider A. (2000). On the definition of ‘woman’ in the sport context. In T. Tännsjö & C.M. Tamburrini (Eds.) Values in Sport. Elitism nationalism gender equality and the scientific manufacturing of winners (pp. 123-138). London-New York: E&FN Spon (Routledge).

  • Simon R. (1993). Fair Play. Sports values and society. Boulder: Westview Press.

  • Tamburrini C.M. (2000). ¿La mano de Dios? Una visión distinta del deporte /The 'Hand of God'. Essays in thePhilosophy of Sports/. Buenos Aires: Continente.

  • Tamburrini C.M. (2011). What’s Wrong With JS Mill’s “Harm-to-Others” Principle? Journal of the Philosophy ofSport 38(1) 1-26.

  • Tännsjö T. (2009). Medical Enhancement and the Ethos od Elite Sport. In J. Savulescu N. Bostrom (Eds.) HumanEnhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Tännsjö T. Tamburrini C.M. (2006). Las bioamazonas del fútbol /The bioamazons of football/. In C. Torres & D. Campos ¿La pelota no dobla? Ensayos filosóficos en torno al fútbol /¿The ball does not bend? Philosophical Essaysabout Football/ (pp. 187-210). Buenos Aires: Zorzal. van Hilvoorde I. Landeweerd L. (2008). Disability or Extraordinary Talent - Francesco Lentini (Three Legs) Versus Oscar Pistorius (No Legs). Sport Ethics and Philosophy 2 97-111.

  • Wolbring G. (2011). Hearing Beyond the Normal Enabled by Therapeutic Devices: The Role of the Recipient and the Hearing Profession. Neuroethics June 1-10. DOI:10.1007/s12152-011-9120-x.

  • Wolbring G. (2011). Who will be the future Olympic and Paralympic Athlete Subtitle Advances in Science andTechnology bodily assistive devices and the future face and purpose of Sport. Retrieved 02.10.2011 from http://www.bioethicsanddisability.org/vancouverpodcast.html

  • Zettler P.J. (2009). Is it Cheating to use cheetahs?: The implications of Technologically innovative prostheses for Sports values and rules. Boston University International Law Journal 27 308-409.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.3

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.201
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.333

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 351 196 8
PDF Downloads 131 79 3