The Ethical Duality in Sports: Social and Psychological Aspects of Transgender Participation

Open access

The Ethical Duality in Sports: Social and Psychological Aspects of Transgender Participation

Historically the notion about the understanding of women has been patriarchal in nature. The postmodern world has an inclination to redefine social mores. The prevailing thought in the 20th and 21st centuries supports the same thesis. The transformation of attitudes appears to be a regular phenomenon in the understanding of the issue at hand, thereby enlivening the motif of unity between the two. Gender, transgender, sexuality, etc., are in a state of transformation, so that to interpret and reinterpret a state of understanding and re-understanding of the issue of participation in sports has multiple significations. Sport in the 21st century constructs inimitable challenges for trans-athletes. A broad spectrum of identities is included under the umbrella of transgender identity. Transsexual or transitioned athletes may pose the greatest challenge to equity in sex-segregated sport competition. The subject under deliberation has a large number of interpretations, all of which center on a need to ‘deconstruct’ the present structuration of acceptance of sex and gender terminology. There is certainly a need to think and contemplate in broader terms about the meanings that assess the well-defined boundaries between disciplines of research. The present thesis highlights a deconstructive stance.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bem S. L. (1984). Androgny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed) Psychology and gender: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation vol. 32 (pp. 179-226). Lincoln Neb: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Bem S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven Conn: Yale University Press.

  • Deaux K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. Am Psychol 39 105-16.

  • Deaux K. Major B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behaviour. Psychol Rev 94 369-89.

  • Eagley A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social role interpretation. Hills Dale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Ehrenreich B. (1999). The real truth about the female body. Times 153(9) 58.

  • Gill D. L. (1992). Gender and sport behavior. In T. S. Horn (Ed.) Advances in sport psychology (pp 143-60). Champaign Illinois: Human Kinetics.

  • Gill D. L. (1995). Gender issues: A social-educational perspective. In S. M. Murphy (Ed.) Sport psychology intervention (pp 205-34). Champaign Illinois: Human Kinetics.

  • Hyde J. S. Linn M. C. (1986). The psychology of gender: Advances through the Meta-Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Maccoby E Jacklin C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford California: Stanford University Pres.

  • Spence J. T. Helmreich R. L. (1978). Masculinity and Femininity. Austin Texas: University of Texas Press.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.3

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.201
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.333

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 411 272 8
PDF Downloads 531 454 61