Visegrad Group and its Presence in the Mashriq Region

Franziska Döring 1
  • 1 Andrássy Gyula German Speaking University Budapest, Hungary


This paper provides an outline about Hungary’s, Poland’s, Slovakia’s and Czechia’s relationships to the Mashriq region, especially Jordan, Israel and Egypt. The Central and Eastern European countries are considered both individually and collectively in the Visegrád group (V4). Therefore quantitative and qualitative indicators are examined. As one result it was found that in most cases the V4 had no common interests and consequently did not formulate common positions. But finally, the results of this work suggest that the migration crisis has indeed increased the interest of the Visegrád countries in the Mashriq and has accelerated their involvement to some extent both in the Mashriq region and within the European Union.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ansary, Tamim (2010): Die unbekannte Mitte der Welt: Globalgeschichte aus islamischer Sicht. Campus Verlag, First Edition, Frankfurt am Main.

  • Basora, Adrian A. (2011): The value of the Visegrad Four (Issue Brief). Washington, D.C.: Atlantic Council. E -Notes. Foreign Policy Research Institute: available at (7 January 2019).

  • Beichelt, Timm (2009): Deutschland und Europa. Die Europäisierung des politischen Systems. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.

  • Cabada, Ladislav – Waisová, Šárka (2018): The Visegrad Four as an ambitious actor of (Central-) European foreign and security policy. Politics in Central Europe 13 (2): 9–20, doi: 10.2478/pce-2018-0014.

  • Castillejo, Clare (2016): The European Union Trust Fund for Africa: A glimpse of the future for EU development cooperation (Discussion Paper 22/2016). Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE): available at (7 January 2019).

  • Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2001): Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change, International Organization 55 (3): 553–588: available at (7 January 2019).

  • Chmiel, Oskar (2018). The Engagement of Visegrad Countries in EU-Africa-Relation (Discussion Paper 24/2018). Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklung-spolitik (DIE): available at (7 January 2019).

  • Clancy-Smith, Julia (2013-11-05): North Africa, Islam and the Mediterranean World. Routledge, London.

  • Dangerfield, Martin (2009): The contribution of the Visegrad Group to the European Union’s ‘Eastern’ policy: Rhetoric or reality? Europe-Asia Studies, 61(10). Taylor & Francis, Ltd.

  • Drążkiewicz, Elżbieta (2008): Official development assistance in the Visegrad Countries. Polish Green Network: available at (7 January 2019).

  • Graziano, Paolo. / Vink, Maarten P. (2007): Challenges of a New Research Agenda, in: P. Graziano and M. P. Vink (Hrsg.) Europeanization. New Research Agendas, 3–21, Houndmills, UK and New York, USA: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • Hille, Peter – Knill, Christoph (2006): It’s the Bureaucracy ‘Stupid’: the Implementation of the Acquis Communautaire in EU Candidate Countries, 1999–2003. European Union Politics. Seventh Volume, 531–552.

  • Káposzta, József / Nagy, Henrietta (2015): Status Report About the Progress of The Visegrad Countries in Relation to Europe 2020 Targets. European Spatial Research and Policy. (Volume 22, no 1, 2015): available at (7 January 2019).

  • Klingebiel, Stephan / Tancrède, Voituriez (2018): It is time to move towards a common development and cooperation policy. The Current Column. März 2018. Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).

  • Kopiński, Dominik (2012): Visegrad Countries’ development aid to Africa: Beyond the rhetoric. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13 (1).

  • Marek, Norbert (2011): Die Visegrád-Staaten auf der Suche nach ihrem eigenen Weg. Analyse der Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik Polens, Tschechiens, Ungarns und der Slowakei. Philosophische Fakultät der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen: available at (6 January 2019).

  • Risse, Thomas / Cowles, Maria Green / Caporaso, James A. (2001): Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction, in: M. G. Cowles, J. Caporaso and T. Risse (Hrsg.) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, 1–20, Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank / Sedelmeier, Ulrich (2005): Introduction. Conceptualizing the Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, in: F. Schimmelfennig and U. Sedelmeier (Hrsg.) The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, 1–28, Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.

  • Toshkov, Dimiter (2012): Compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe. The Disaster that Didn’t Happen (Yet). In: L’Europe en Formation, no 364, p. 91–109: available at December 2019).

  • Weber, Bodo (2017): The EU-Turkey Refugee Deal and the Not Quite Closed Balkan Route. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung: available at (4 January 2019).

  • Jewish Virtual Library: Immigration to Israel: Aliyah Bet (1939–1948). In: Jewish Virtual Library: available at (7 January 2019).

  • Deutschlandfunk (2014): Naher Osten: Das Sykes-Picot-Abkommen im Ersten Weltkrieg. 21. Juni 2014:available at (6 January 2019).

  • European Commission (2018). Publication of preliminary figures on 2017 Official Development Assistance: available at (7 January 2019).

  • EUR-Lex: Acquis: available at (7 January 2019).

  • Gnauck, Gerhard (2016): Geschlossen gegen Merkel., 26. August 2016. (7 January 2019).


Journal + Issues