Trends in confidence in public institutions: A comparative analysis of the Baltic countries

Open access

Abstract

The paper focuses on the variation of institutional confidence in the Baltic countries. Within of framework of qualitative comparative framework, it employs a historical approach to detect causes of divergence of trust in rule of law institutions between Estonia vis-à-vis other two Baltic states. While it observes a range of variables that could affect the differences, it emphasises the role of political leadership during critical junctures, which might explain both why Estonia forged ahead at the outset of the post-communist transformation and most recent positive developments in the Baltic countries since the financial crisis in 2008–2010.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Auers Daunis (2015): Comparative Politics and Government of the Baltic States: Estonia Latvia and Lithuania in the 21st Century. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Bennich-Björkman Li (2006): Building Post-communist States: Political Corruption and Strategies of Party Formation in Estonia and Latvia in Kn. Sven Eliaeson (ed.) Building Democracy and Civil Society East of the Elbe: Essays in Honour of Edmund Mokrzycki. New York: Routledge.

  • Bennich-Björkman Li (2007): The cultural roots of Estonia’s successful transition: how historical legacies shaped the 1990 s. East European Politics & Societies Vol. 21.

  • Boda Z. – Medve-Balint G. (2014): Does Institutional Trust in East Central Europe Differ from Western Europe? European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 3 (2): 1–17.

  • Bühlmann M. – Kunz R. (2011): Confidence in the Judiciary: Comparing the Independence and Legitimacy of Judicial Systems. West European Politics 34 (2): 317–345.

  • Catterberg G. – Moreno A. (2006): The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion 18 (1): 31–48.

  • Cook Karen S. – Hardin Russell – Levi Margaret (2005): Cooperation without Trust? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Drechsler W. (2005): The Re-Emergence of “Weberian” Public Administration aft er the Fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European Perspective. Halduskultuur 6: 94–108.

  • Elster Jon – Offe Claus – Preuss Ulrich K. (1998): Institutional Design in Post-communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • European Commission Eurobarometer: available at http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/PublicOpinion/.

  • European Social Survey: available at http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/.

  • Eurostat: available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.

  • European Values Study: available at http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/.

  • Gambetta Diego (2000): Can we trust trust? in Gambetta Diego ed. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations 213–237. Oxford: University of Oxford Department of Sociology

  • Grönlund Kimmo – Setälä Maija (2012): In Honest Officials We Trust: Institutional Confidence in Europe. The American Review of Public Administration 42 (5): 523–542

  • Grzymala-Busse Anna (2007): Rebuilding Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hall Peter (2003): Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Politics in Mahoney James – Rueschmeyer Dietrich (eds). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences 373–404 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hardin Russell (2006): Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Hellman Joel S. (1998): Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions. World Politics 50 (2): 203–234.

  • Kalniņš Valts (2015): Process-tracing study report on Estonia. ANTICORRP Hertie School of Governance.

  • Kumlin Staffan – Rothstein Bo (2005): Making and Breaking Social Capital. The Impact of Welfare State Institutions. Comparative Political Studies 38 (4): 339–65.

  • Linde J. (2012): Why feed the hand that bites you Perceptions of procedural fairness and system support in post-communist democracies. European Journal of Political Research 51 (3): 410–434.

  • Lühiste K. (2006): Explaining trust in political institutions: Some illustrations from the Baltic states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39: 475–496.

  • Mattusch K. (1997): Weltbilder als Weichensteller für die Richtung des Wandels. Zur Aktualität der “Protestantischen Ethik” am Beispiel des Baltikums in Sterbling A. – Zipprian H. (eds.) Max Weber und Osteuropa. Beiträge zur Osteuropa forschung Bd. 1. Hamburg: Reinhold Krämer Verlag.

  • Meer van der T. – Hakhverdian A. (2017): Political Trust as the Evaluation of Process and Performance: A Cross-National Study of 42 European Countries. Political Studies 65 (1): 81–102.

  • Miller A. H. (1993): In Search of Regime Legitimacy in Miller A. H. et al. eds. Public Opinion and Regime Change. Oxford: Westview Press.

  • Mishler W. – Rose R. (2001): What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-communist Societies. Comparative Political Studies 34 (1): 30–62.

  • Nemec Juraj (2008): Public Management Reforms in CEE: Lessons Learned in Bouckaert G. – Nemec J. – Nakrošis V. – Hajnal G. – Tõnnisson K. eds. Public management reforms in Central and Eastern Europe 343–372 Bratislava Slovakia NISPAcee.

  • New Baltic Barometer (1993 1995 1996 2000 2001 2004) [Richard Rose] University of Strathclyde Glasgow Scotland.

  • Kitschelt Herbert et al. (1999): Post-Communist Party Systems. Competition Representation and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Norkus Zenonas (2008): Kokia demokratija koks kapitalizmas? Pokomunistinė transformacija Lietuvoje lyginamosios istorinės sociologijos požiūriu. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.

  • Norkus Zenonas (2011): Estonian Latvian and Lithuanian post-communist development in the comparative perspective in Lauristin Marju ed. Estonian Human Development Report 2010/2011: Baltic Way(s) of Human Development: Twenty Years On 22–30 Tallinn: Eesti Koostöögu.

  • Norkus Zenonas (2012): On Baltic Slovenia and Adriatic Lithuania: A qualitative comparative analysis of patterns in post-communist transformation. Vilnius Budapest: Apostrofa/Central European University Press.

  • Ostrom Elinor – Ahn T.K. (2009): The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. In Svendsen Gert Tinggaard – Svendsen Gunnar Lind Haase eds. Handbook of Social Capital: The Troika of Sociology Political Science and Economics. Cheltenham & Northhampton: Edward Elgar.

  • Office of the President of the Republic Lithuania (2015): https://www.lrp.lt/lt/spaudos-centras/pranesimai-spaudai/prezidente-skaitys-sesta-metini-pranesima/22880

  • Putnam Robert (1993): Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Ramonaitė Ainė et al. (2014): Kaip renkasi Lietuvos rinkėjai? Idėjos interesai ir įvaizdžiai politikoje. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.

  • Randma L. (2001): A Small Civil Service in Transition: The Case of Estonia. Public Administration and Development 21(1).

  • Rose R. – Mishler W. (2011): Political Trust and Distrust in Post-Authoritarian Contexts in Zmerli S. – Hooghe M. eds. Political Trust. Why Context Matters 117–140 ECPR Press.

  • Rothstein Bo (2011): The Quality of Government: Corruption Social Trust and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Rothstein Bo – Stolle Dietlind (2008): The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Comparative Politics 40 (4)(Jul. 2008): 441–459.

  • Sarapuu K. (2012): Administrative Structure in Times of Changes: The Development of Estonian Ministries and Government Agencies 1990–2010. International Journal of Public Administration 35.

  • Steen Anton (1996): Confidence in Institutions in Post-Communist Societies: The Case of the Baltic States Scandinavian Political Studies 19 (3): 205–224.

  • Svallofors Stefan (2013): Government quality egalitarianism and attitudes to taxes and social spending: A European comparison. European Political Science Review 5(3): 363–380.

  • Titma M. et al. (1998): Winners and losers in the postcommunist transition: New evidence from Estonia. Post-Soviet Affairs 14(2): 114–136.

  • Tõnnisson Kristiina – Randma-Liiv Tiina (2008): Public Management Reforms: Estonia in Bouckaert G. – Nemec J. – Nakrošis V. – Hajnal G. – Tõnnisson K. eds. Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe 93–120 Bratislava Slovakia: NISPAcee.

  • United Nations (2015): Human Development Report 2015: available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/2015-report.

  • Uslaner Eric M. (2008): Corruption Inequality and the Rule of Law: The Bulging Pocket Makes the Easy Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Uslaner Eric M. (2009): Corruption in Svendsen Gert Tinggaard – Svendsen Gunnar Lind Haase eds. Handbook of Social Capital: The Troika of Sociology Political Science and Economics. Cheltenham & Northhampton: Edward Elgar.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.48

Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.18
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.195

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 468 206 8
PDF Downloads 200 117 3