Assessment of the accuracy in prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations. Analysis of 101 questionnaires filled in by parents of neonates hospitalized in the Department of Congenital Malformations Polish Mother's Memorial Research Institute
Prenatal diagnosis is an integral part of modern perinatal care. In the article results of questionnaires pertaining to the prenatal process of diagnosis are presented. Parents whose children were afflicted with congenital malformations of all types responded to enquiry
Materials and methods:
Between March 2014 and March 2015 150 of 355 infants were hospitalized in the Department of Pediatric Intensive Care and Congenital Malformations in Łódź, and 150 had congenital malformations.
101 parents of 150 children (67,3%) have given the feedback. Anomalies were such as: of the digestive system (37%), CHD (25%), OUN (14 %), genito-urinary (13%), skeletal system (9%) and respiratory system (2%). In 65 children of 101 the defects were detected prenatally. The obstetric US exam was the most frequently pointed out as performed (more than 1200). The biochemical markers and genetic tests in were performed in 34 pregnancies. The high percentage of ability to detect malformation was reported in the group of fetal echo examinations.
1. Prenatal ultrasound exams were the least effective method of making appropriate prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformation.
2. Fetal echocardiography had a high level of sensitivity and specificity in detecting congenital malformations.
3. Prenatal cardiologists proved to be the most effective in detecting congenital malformations 89,3 % of detected abnormalities.
4. Biochemical exams had a positive result in only one case of Down Syndrome.
2. Perenc M.: Prenatal diagnoses of congenital malformations - invasive and noninvasive methods. Przew. Lek. 2002 5 5 94-99
3. Dangel J.:Prenatal diagnoses: myths and reality. Nauka 3/2007 31-47
4. Benoit RM Copel JA. Antenatal screening with fetal echocardiography: when and how. Contemporary OB/GYN Vol. 48 No 9 September 2003 p.59
5. Eik-Nes S Lee W Carvalho JS Chaoui R Copel J Hecher K Paladini D. Cardiac creening examination of the fetus: guidelines for performing the ‘basic’ and ‘extended basic’ cardiac scan. ISUOG Guidelines Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 107-113
13. Wigton TR Sabbagha RE Tamura RK Cohen L Minogue JP Strasburger JF.: Sonographic diagnosis of congenital heart disease: comparison between the four-chamber view and multiple cardiac views. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 82219-24
14. Warrier D Saraf R Maheshwari S Suresh P Shah S.: Awareness of fetal echo in Indian scenario. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2012 5 156-9
15. Gottliebson WM Border WL Franklin CM Meyer RA Michelfelder EC.: Accuracy of fetal echocardiography: a cardiac segment-specific analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 28 15-21
16. Abu-Rustum RS Daou L Abu-Rustum SE.: Role of ultrasonography in early gestation in the diagnosis of congenital heart defects. J Ultrasound Med. 2010 29 817-21
17. Plesinac S Terzic M Stimec B Plecas D.: Value of fetal echocardiography in diagnosis of congenital heart disease in a Serbian university hospital. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2007 52 89-92
18. Słodki M Rychik J Moszura T Janiak K Respondek-Liberska M.: Measurement of the great vessels in the mediastinum could help distinguish true from false-positive coarctation of the aorta in the third trimester. J Ultrasound Med. 2009 281313-7
19. Respondek-Liberska M Sysa A Gadzinowski J: Financial comparison of neonatal transportation: in utero by ambulance and by air transportation. Ginekol. Pol. 2004 75 326- 331
20. Chaoi R Rake A Heling KS. Aortic arch with four vessels: Aberrant right subclavian artery.Ultrasound Obstet Ginecol. 200831115-117.
21. Allan LD Crawford DC Chita SK. Prenatal screening for congenital heart disease. British Medical Journal.1986 292 1717-1719.
22. Carvalho JS Allan LD Chaoui R et al; International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:348-359
23. Kemper AR Mahle WT Martin GR et al. Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/128/5/e1259
24. Rebecca F. Liberman MPH Kelly D. Getz PhDAngela E. Lin Cathleen A. HigginsSepehr Sekhavat Glenn R. Markenson and Marlene Anderka. Delayed Diagnosis of Critical Congenital Heart Defects: Trends and Associated Factors Pediatrics 2014;134;e373
25. Dawson AL Cassell CH Riehle-Colarusso Tet al. Factors associated with late detection of critical congenital heart disease in newborns. Pediatrics. 2013;132(3). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/132/3/e604
26. Oster ME Lee KA Honein MA RiehleColarusso T Shin M Correa A. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics.2013;131(5). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/131/5/e1502
27. L. R. Freud A. Moon-Grady M. C. Escobar-Diaz N. L. Gotteiner L. T. Young D. B. McElhinney and W. Tworetzky: Low rate of prenatal diagnosis among neonates with critical aortic stenosis: insight into the natural history in utero
28. Respondek-Liberska M Sklansky M Wood D Słodki M Weiner S Cuneo B Huhta J Gembruch U Rizzo G Sharland G Achiron R Pruetz J. Recommendations for fetal echocardiography in singleton pregnancy in 2015. Prenat Cardio 2015 2 28-34
29. Chaoui R. Fetal echocardiography: state of the art of the state of the heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17:277-84