A state-of-the-art review of built environment information modelling (BeIM)

Open access


Elements that constitute the built environment are vast and so are the independent systems developed to model its various aspects. Many of these systems have been developed under various assumptions and approaches to execute functions that are distinct, complementary or sometimes similar. Furthermore, these systems are ever increasing in number and often assume similar nomenclatures and acronyms, thereby exacerbating the challenges of understanding their peculiar functions, definitions and differences. The current societal demand to improve sustainability per­formance through collaboration as well as whole-system and through-life thinking is driving the need to integrate independent systems associated with different aspects and scales of the built environment to deliver smart solutions and services that improve the well-being of citizens. The contemporary object-oriented digitization of real-world elements appears to provide a leeway for amalgamating the modelling systems of various domains in the built environment which we termed as built environment information modelling (BeIM). These domains include architecture, engineering, construction as well as urban planning and design. Applications such as building information modelling, geographic information systems and 3D city modelling systems are now being integrated for city modelling purposes. The various works directed at integrating these systems are examined, revealing that current research efforts on integration fall into three categories: (1) data/file conversion systems, (2) semantic mapping systems and (3) the hybrid of both. The review outcome suggests that good knowledge of these domains and how their respective systems operate is vital to pursuing holistic systems integration in the built environment.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abanda F. H. Vidalakis C. Oti A. H. & Tah J. H. M. (2015). A critical analysis of Building Information Modelling systems used in construction projects. Advances in Engineering Software 90 pp. 183-201.

  • AIA. (2013). Guide Instructions and Commentary to the 2013 AIA Digital Practice Documents The American Institute of Architects. PAS 1192-2:2013.

  • Akinci B. Karimi H. Pradhan A. Wu C.-C. & Fichtl G. (2010). CAD and GIS interoperability through semantic web services. CAD and GIS Integration 199.

  • Apollonio F. Gaiani M. & Sun Z. (2013). 3D modeling and data enrichment in digital reconstruction of architectural heritage. ISPRS Archives 5: W2.

  • Apollonio F. I. Gaiani M. & Sun Z. (2012). BIM-based modeling and data enrichment of classical architectural buildings. SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology 2(2) pp. 41-62.

  • Bahar Y. N. Pere C. Landrieu J. & Nicolle C. (2013). A thermal simulation tool for building and its interoperability through the Building Information Modeling (BIM) platform. Buildings 3(2) 380-398.

  • Bansal V. (2010). Use of GIS and topology in the identification and resolution of space conflicts. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 25(2) 159-171.

  • Barton J. & Plume J. (2006). A geospatial approach to managing public housing on super lots. In: Abdul-Rahman A. Zlatanova S. & Coors V. (eds.) Innovations in 3D Geo Information Systems. Springer pp. 615-628.

  • Batty M. (2000). The new urban geography of the third dimension. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27(4) pp. 483-484.

  • Benner J. Geiger A. Gröger G. Häfele K. & Löwner M. (2013). Enhanced LOD concepts for virtual 3D city models. ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry remote sensing and spatial information sciences. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS 8th 3D GeoInfo Conference & WG II/2 Workshop 27-29 November 2013 Istanbul Turkey.

  • Benner J. Geiger A. & Leinemann K. (2005). Flexible generation of semantic 3D building models. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Next Generation 3D City Models Bonn.

  • Biljecki F. Stoter J. Ledoux H. Zlatanova S. & Çöltekin A. (2015). Applications of 3D city models: state of the art review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4(4) pp. 2842-2889.

  • Billen R. Cutting-Decelle A.-F. Marina O. de Almeida J.-P. Caglioni M. Falquet G. et al. (2014). 3D City Models and urban information: Current issues and perspectives -European COST Action TU0801 EDP sciences.

  • BIM Forum. (2015). Level of Development Specification BIMForum. Accessed 29 July 2016 from: https://bimforum.org/2015/07/23/draft-2015-lod-spec-available-for-comment/.

  • Bishr Y. (1998). Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12(4) pp. 299-314.

  • Borrmann A. (2010). From GIS to BIM and back again-A Spatial Query Language for 3D building models and 3D city models. In: 5th International 3D Geoinfo Conference BerlinV.

  • Borrmann A. Kolbe T. H. Donaubauer A. Steuer H. Jubierre J. R. & Flurl M. (2015). Multi-scale geometric semantic modeling of shield tunnels for GIS and BIM applications. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 30(4) pp. 263-281.

  • Breunig M. & Zlatanova S. (2011). 3D geo-database research: Retrospective and future directions. Computers & Geosciences 37(7) pp. 791-803.

  • BSI. (2013). PAS 1192-2:2013 - Specification for information management for the capita/delivery phase of construction projects using building information modelling British Standards Institute. PAS 1192-2:2013.

  • buildingSMART. (2016). Home/Future. Available at http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/future on 28 March 2016.

  • Chandrasekaran B. Josephson J. R. & Benjamins V. R. (1999). What are ontologies and why do we need them? IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(1) pp. 20-26.

  • Charalabidis Y. Panetto H. Loukis E. & Mertins K. (2008). Interoperability approaches for enterprises and adminis­trations worldwide. The Electronic Journal for E-commerce Tools and Applications (eJETA) 2(3) pp. 1-10.

  • Charalabidis Y. Pantelopoulos S. & Koussos Y. (2004). Enabling interoperability of transactional enterprise applications. In: Workshop on Interoperability of Enterprise Systems 18th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP) Oslo.

  • Chawathe S. Garcia-Molina H. Hammer J. Ireland K. Papakonstantinou Y. Ullman J. et al. (1994). The TSIMMIS project: Integration of heterogenous information sources. In: Information Processing Society of Japan (IPSJ 1994) October 1994 Tokyo Japan.

  • Chen R. (2011). The development of 3D city model and its applications in urban planning. In: Geoinformatics 2011 19th International Conference on IEEE Shanghai China.

  • Cheng J. Deng Y. & Du Q. (2013). Mapping between BIM models and 3D GIS city models of different levels of detail. In: 13th international Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality London.

  • Cheng J. C. Lu Q. & Deng Y. (2016). Analytical review and evaluation of civil information modeling. Automation in Construction 67 pp. 31-47.

  • Clemen C. & Gründig L. (2006). The Industry Foundation Classes (IFC)-ready for indoor cadastre? In: Proceedings of XXIII International FIG Congress Munich.

  • Cote P. (2007). OGC web services architecture for CAD GIS and BIM. Interoperability Program Report Version 1: 07-023.

  • de Laat R. & van Berlo L. (2011). Integration of BIM and GIS: The development of the CityGML GeoBIM extension. In: Kolbe T. König G. & Nagel C. (eds.) Advances in 3D Geo-Information Sciences. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Deng Y. Cheng J. C. & Anumba C. (2016). Mapping between BIM and 3D GIS in different levels of detail using schema mediation and instance comparison. Automation in Construction 67 pp. 1-21.

  • Döllner J. Baumann K. & Buchholz H. (2006). Virtual 3D city models as foundation of complex urban information spaces. CORP & Geomultimedia06 Vienna.

  • Döllner J. & Hagedorn B. (2007). Integrating urban GIS CAD and BIM data by service based virtual 3D city models. In: Rumor M. Coors V. Fendel E. M. & Zlatanova S. (eds.) Urban and Regional Data Management-Annual. Taylor & Francis Group London pp. 157-160.

  • Dore C. & Murphy M. (2012). Integration of historic building information modeling and 3D GIS for recording and managing cultural heritage sites. In: 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia: “Virtual Systems in the Information Society” 2-5 September 2012 Milan Italy pp. 369-376. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Du Y. & Zlatanova S. (2006). An approach for 3D visualization of pipelines. In: Abdul-Rahman A. Zlatanova S. & Coors V. (eds.) Innovations in 3D Geo Information Systems. Lecture Notes in

  • Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp. 501-517. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Egan S. J. (1998). Rethinking Construction. Construction Task Force Scope for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of the Construction Industry. Department of Environment Transport and the Regions (DETR) London UK.

  • El-Mekawy M. Östman A. & Hijazi I. (2012). A unified building model for 3D urban GIS. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 1(2) pp. 120-145.

  • Elbeltagi E. & Dawood M. (2011). Integrated visualized time control system for repetitive construction projects. Automation in Construction 20(7) pp. 940-953.

  • Fai S. Graham K. Duckworth T. Wood N. & Attar R. (2011). Building information modelling and heritage documentation. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium International Scientific Committee for Documentation of Cultural Heritage (CIPA) Prague Czech Republic.

  • Fosu R. Suprabhas K. Rathore Z. & Cory C. (2015). Integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-a literature review and future needs. In: Beetz J. et al (eds.) Proceedings of the 32nd CIB W78 Conference 27th-29th October Eindhiven The Netherlands.

  • Gröger G. & Plümer L. (2012). CityGML-Interoperable semantic 3D city models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 71 pp. 12-33.

  • Gruber T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2) pp. 199-220.

  • Hichri N. Stefani C. De Luca L. Veron P. & Hamon G. (2013.). From point cloud to BIM: a survey of existing approaches. In: Proceedings of the XXIV International CIPA Symposium 2013 Strasbourg France.〈hal-01178692〉

  • Hijazi I. Ehlers M. Zlatanova S. Becker T. & van Berlo L. (2011). Initial investigations for modeling interior Utilities within 3D Geo Context: Transforming IFC-interior utility to CityGML/ UtilityNetworkADE. In: Kolbe T. König G. & Nagel C. (eds.) Advances in 3D Geo-Information Sciences. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp. 95-113. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hijazi I. Ehlers M. Zlatanova S. & Isikdag U. (2009). IFC to CityGML transformation framework for geo-analysis: a water utility network case. In: 4th International Workshop on 3D Geo-Information 4-5 November 2009 Ghent Belgium.

  • Hijazi I. H. Ehlers M. & Zlatanova S. (2012). NIBU: A new approach to representing and analysing interior utility networks within 3D geo-information systems. International Journal of Digital Earth 5(1) pp. 22-42.

  • Irizarry J. & Karan E. P. (2012). Optimizing location of tower cranes on construction sites through GIS and BIM integration. Journal of Information Technology in Construction 17 pp. 351-366.

  • Irizarry J. Karan E. P. & Jalaei F. (2013). Integrating BIM and GIS to improve the visual monitoring of construction supply chain management. Automation in Construction 31 pp. 241-254.

  • Isikdag U. Underwood J. & Aouad G. (2008). An investigation into the applicability of building information models in geospatial environment in support of site selection and fire response management processes. Advanced Engineering Informatics 22(4) pp. 504-519.

  • Isikdag U. & Zlatanova S. (2009). Towards defining a framework for automatic generation of buildings in CityGML using building Information Models. In: Lee J. & Zlatanova S. (eds.) 3D Geo- Information Sciences. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp. 79-96. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Karan E. P. & Irizarry J. (2015). Extending BIM interoperability to preconstruction operations using geospatial analyses and semantic web services. Automation in Construction 53 pp. 1-12.

  • Karan E. P. Irizarry J. & Haymaker J. (2015). BIM and GIS integration and interoperability based on semantic web technology. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 30(3) 04015043.

  • Kim S. A. Shin D. Choe Y. Seibert T. & Walz S. P. (2012). Integrated energy monitoring and visualization system for Smart Green City development: Designing a spatial information integrated energy monitoring model in the context of massive data management on a web based platform. Automation in Construction 22 pp. 51-59.

  • Kolbe T. H. (2009). Representing and exchanging 3D city models with CityGML. In: Lee J. & Zlatanova S. (eds.) 3D Geo- Information Sciences. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87395-2_2.

  • Kuhn W. (2005). Geospatial semantics: why of what and how? In: Spaccapietra S. & Zimányi E. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics III. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3534. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/11496168_1.

  • Kvan T. (2000). Collaborative design: What is it? Automation in Construction 9(4) pp. 409-415.

  • Kyle B. R. (2001). Toward effective decision making for building management. In: Proceedings of APWA International Public Works Congress Sep. 2001 NRCC/CPWA/IPWEA Seminar Series in Innovations in Urban Infrastructure Philadelphia. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f4c/1110177159d4c­d6aee0baaba2aea6c1eac69.pdf.

  • Leite F. Akcamete A. Akinci B. Atasoy G. & Kiziltas S. (2011). Analysis of modeling effort and impact of different levels of detail in building information models. Automation in Construction 20(5) pp. 601-609.

  • Lemer A. (1998). Progress toward integrated infrastructure-assets-management systems: GIS and beyond. In: Innovations in Urban Infrastructure Seminar of the APWA International Public Works Congress September 1998. NRCC/CPWA/ IPWEA Seminar Series “Innovations in Urban Infrastructure” Philadelphia. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/88b9/6b91e06687a9f67a8fdb86400fc1c3389c3f.pdf.

  • Maarof M. H. B. S. & Yahya Y. (2009). Digital libraries interop­erability issues. In: Electrical Engineering and Informatics 2009. ICEEI’09. International Conference on IEEE Selangor Malaysia.

  • Marzouk M. & Hisham M. (2012). Applications of building information modeling in cost estimation of infrastructure bridges. International Journal of 3-D Information Modelling (IJ3DIM) 1(2) pp. 17-29.

  • Mattessich P. W. & Monsey B. R. (1992). Collaboration: What Makes it Work. A Review of Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration. ERIC Amherst H. Wilder Foundation St. Paul MN. ISBN-0-940-06902-4.

  • Murphy M. McGovern E. & Pavia S. (2013). Historic Building Information Modelling-Adding intelligence to laser and image based surveys of European classical architecture. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 76 pp. 89-102.

  • Nagel C. & Kolbe T. H. (2007). Conversion of IFC to CityGML. In: Meeting of the OGC 3DIM Working Group at OGC TC/PC Meeting Paris (Frankreich).

  • OMG. (2015). Unified Modeling Language Specification UML v2.5. Available at http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5/PDF/ on March 2016.

  • Park J. & Ram S. (2004). Information systems interoperability: What lies beneath? ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22(4) pp. 595-632.

  • Peachavanish R. Karimi H. A. Akinci B. & Boukamp F. (2006). An ontological engineering approach for integrating CAD and GIS in support of infrastructure management. Advanced Engineering Informatics 20(1) pp. 71-88.

  • Rafiee A. Dias E. Fruijtier S. & Scholten H. (2014). From BIM to geo-analysis: view coverage and shadow analysis by BIM/GIS integration. Procedia Environmental Sciences 22 pp. 397-402.

  • Ram S. & Ramesh V. (1999). Schema integration: Past present and future. Management of Heterogeneous and Autonomous Database Systems Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc pp. 119-155.

  • Rezaei R. Chiew T. K. Lee S. P. & Aliee Z. S. (2014a). A semantic interoperability framework for software as a service systems in cloud computing environments. Expert Systems with Applications 41(13) pp. 5751-5770.

  • Roof K. (2008). Public health: Seattle and King County’s push for the built environment. Journal of Environmental Health 71(1) 24.

  • Saygi G. Agugiaro G. Hamamcioglu-Turan M. & Remondino F. (2013). Evaluation of GIS and BIM roles for the information management of historical buildings. ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry Remote Sensing Spatial Information Sciences 2 pp. 283-288.

  • Sen S. Fernandes D. Arunachalam G. Gupta S. R. & Sarda N. (2007). Framework of semantic interoperability using geospatial ontologies. Journal of Geomatics pp. 71-76.

  • Shiode N. (2000). 3D urban models: Recent developments in the digital modelling of urban environments in three-dimensions. GeoJournal 52(3) pp. 263-269.

  • Shirole A. M. Riordan T. J. Chen S. S. Gao Q. Hu H. & Puckett J. A. (2009). BrIM for project delivery and the life-cycle: state of the art. Bridge Structures 5(4) pp. 173-187.

  • Stadler A. & Kolbe T. H. (2007). Spatio-semantic coherence in the integration of 3D city models. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality Enschede.

  • Stoter J. Vosselman G. Goos J. Zlatanova S. Verbree E. Klooster R. et al. (2011). Towards a national 3D spatial data infrastructure: Case of the Netherlands. Photogrammetrie- Fernerkundung-Geoinformation 2011(6) pp. 405-420.

  • Thomas G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition discourse and structure. Qualitative inquiry 17(6) pp. 511-521.

  • Thompson E. Horne M. Lockley S. & Cerny M. (2011). Towards an information rich 3D city model: Virtual NewcastleGateshead GIS integration. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management Alberta Canada.

  • Toroghi Bidabadi Z. Hosseinalipour M. Hamidizadeh M. R. & Mohebifar A. (2016). Supply chain collaboration within the Iranian construction industry. Organization Technology & Management in Construction: An International Journal 8(1) pp. 1437-1445.

  • van Berlo L. & de Laat R. (2011). Integration of BIM and GIS: The development of the CityGML GeoBIM extension. In: Kolbe T. H. König G. & Nagel C. (eds.) Advances in 3D Geo-Information Sciences. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 211Ã-227.

  • Veer H. & Wiles A. (2008). Achieving Technical Interoperability-the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) Approach ETSI White Paper No. 3 ETSI Publishers. Available at http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/whitepapers/WP3_IOP_final.pdf.

  • Vanier D. D. (2001). Why industry needs asset management tools. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 15(1) pp. 35-43.

  • Visser U. Stuckenschmidt H. & Schlieder C. (2002a). Interoper­ability in GIS-enabling technologies. In: Ruiz M. Gould M. & Ramon J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science 25-27 April 2002 Palma Spain.

  • Visser U. Stuckenschmidt H. Schuster G. & Vögele T. (2002b). Ontologies for geographic information processing. Computers & Geosciences 28(1) pp. 103-117.

  • Visser U. Stuckenschmidt H. Wache H. & Vögele T. (2000). Enabling technologies for interoperability. In: Visser U. & Pundt H. (eds.) Workshop on the 14th International Symposium of Computer Science for Environmental Protection Bonn Germany.

  • W3C. (2015). Semantic Web. Available at https://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/ on March 2016.

  • Wiederhold G. (1992). Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. Computer 25(3) pp. 38-49.

  • Zhang X. Arayici Y. Wu S. Abbott C. & Aouad G. (2009). Integrating BIM and GIS for large-scale facilities asset management: A critical review. In: The Twelfth International Conference on Civil Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing 1-4 September 2009 Funchal Madeira Portugal.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 443 294 5
PDF Downloads 250 197 5