Do environmental quality standards for selected nerve agents ensure safety of the ecosystems? / Czy istniejące standardy jakości środowiska dla wybranych fosforoorganicznych bojowych środków trujących zapewniają również ochronę ekosystemów?

Open access


Possible hazard and risk posed by organophosphate nerve agents (OP-NA) towards higher organisms and humans is well recognized, but scientific data about environmental effects of these compounds are still limited. The main aim of this study was to inspect if established interim military drinking water and soil standards for selected nerve agents are also safe for ecosystems. The results of this research may indicate whether taking additional decontamination actions are needed after incidental or intended release of OP-NA in the environment. Three OP-NA were selected as model compounds: soman, sarin and VX. Results from aquatic and soil ecotoxicity test were used to estimate the predicted no effect concentrations according to the EU methodology. Risk quotients were calculated both for water and soil compartments. The results of this study indicate that existing OPNA standards are underprotective for organisms living in soil and water. There is a necessity of preparing much more extensive testing strategy for chemical warfare agents’ assessment in the environment leading to reduced high uncertainty in current risk estimation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • DANIELS J.I. 1990. Organophosphorus nerve agents. Pp. 4-1-4-40 in Evaluation of Military Field-Water Quality. Vol. 4. Health Criteria and Recommendations for Standards. Part 2. Interim Standards for Selected Threat Agents and Risks from Exceeding These Standards J.I. Daniels ed. AD UCRL-21008. Report prepared by the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory University of California Livermore Calif. for the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command Fort Detrick Frederick Md.

  • GUPTA R.C. 2009. Handbook of toxicology of chemical warfare agents. London: Academic Press.

  • KALINOWSKI R. CHRZANOWSKA E. BRYTAN M. 2011a. Ocena ekotoksyczności wybranych bojowych środków trujących w stosunku do skorupiaków Daphnia magna Ochrona środowiska i zasobów naturalnych 48: 413-422.

  • KALINOWSKI R. CHRZANOWSKA E. BRYTAN M. 2011b. Oddziaływanie bojowych środków trujących na rośliny wyższe w teście Phytotoxkit Inżynieria i Ochrona Środowiska 14 3:245-255.

  • MANAHAN S.E. 2010. Toksykologia środowiska WN PWN Warszawa.

  • OECD 2004. Test No. 202. Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  • PHYTOTOXKIT 2010. Seed germination and early growth microbiotest with higher plants. Standard Operational Procedure MicroBioTests Inc. Belgium.

  • RABER E. CARLSEN T.M. FOLKS K.J. KIRVEL R.D. DANIELS J.I. BOGEN K.T. 2004. How clean is clean enough? Recent developments in response to threats posed by chemical and biological warfare agents. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 14 1: 31-41.

  • ROSENBLATT D.H. FINCH R.J. KIMMELL T.A. ANDERSON A.W. 1996. Background chemistry for chemical warfare agents and decontamination processes in support of delisting waste streams at the U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground Utah.

  • Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances; Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances; Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market European Communities 2003.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.41

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.143
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.387

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 99 29 0
PDF Downloads 51 23 0