Extreme weather affects Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus tundrius) breeding success in South Greenland

Linnéa Carlzon 1 , Amanda Karlsson 1 , Knud Falk 2 , Antonia Liess 1 and Søren Møller 3
View More View Less
  • 1 Rydberg Laboratory of Applied Science, 30118, Halmstad, Sweden
  • 2 11765, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3 Roskilde University Library, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
Volume/Issue:
Volume 26: Issue 2
Published online:
14 Feb 2019
Pages:
38–50
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/orhu-2018-0014
Open access

Abstract

In order to better understand the potential effects of climate change on the Peregrine Falcon, we investigated the relationship between extreme weather events and Peregrines’ breeding success in South Greenland. We defined three variables – number of days with extremely low temperatures, extreme precipitation, consecutive rainy days – and an additive variable, total days with extreme weather, and tested their relationship with Peregrines’ breeding success (measured as young per site and nest success) over a 33 year study period. Breeding success was negatively influenced by the number of days with extreme weather and extremely low temperature. The strongest relationship found was total days with extreme weather in the entire breeding season, which explained 22% and 27% of the variation in nest success and young per site, respectively. The number of days with extreme weather in our study related to fluctuations in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Thus, with a strengthening of the NAO, linked to climate change, more extreme weather may occur in the Arctic and induce increased variation in Peregrines’ breeding success. Our data did not allow us to pinpoint when in the breeding cycle inclement weather was particularly harmful, and we recommend finer-scale research (e.g. automated nest cameras) to better monitor the species-specific effects of rapidly changing climate.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anctil A. Franke A. & Bêty J. 2014. Heavy rainfall increases nestling mortality of an arctic top predator: experimental evidence and long-term trend in Peregrine Falcons. – Oecologia 174(3): 1033–1043. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2800-y

  • BirdLife International 2016. Falco peregrinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e. T45354964A95143387. – http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T45354964A95143387.en. (Last accessed on 2017-05-10)

  • Boertmann D. 2008. Grønlands Rødliste – 2007 [Greenland Red List – 2007]. – Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser Aarhus Universitet og Grønlands Hjemmestyre: 156. (in Danish)

  • Bradley M. Johnstone R. Court G. & Duncan T. 1997. Influence of weather on breeding success of Peregrine Falcons in the Arctic. – The Auk 114(4): 786–791. DOI: 10.2307/4089303

  • Bruggeman J. E. Swem T. Andersen D. E. Kennedy P. L. & Nigro D. 2016. Multiseason occupancy models identify biotic and abiotic factors influencing a recovering Arctic Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus tundrius population. – Ibis 158(1): 61–74. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12313

  • Cappelen J. 2016. DMI Report 16-08 Weather observations from Greenland 1958–2015 – Observation data with description. – Report/Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut. – http://www.dmi.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Rap-porter/TR/2016/DMIRep16-08.pdf (Last accessed on 2017-03-06)

  • Cleasby I. R. Bodey T. W. Vigfusdottir F. McDonald J. L. McElwaine G. Mackie K. Colhoun K. & Bear-hop S. 2017. Climatic conditions produce contrasting influences on demographic traits in a long-distance Arctic migrant. – Journal of Animal Ecology 86(2): 285–295. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12623

  • Clum N. Harrity P. & Weck H. 1996. Aging young Peregrines. – In: Cade T. J. Enderson J. H. & Linthicum J. (eds.) Guide to Management of Peregrine Falcons at the Eyrie. – The Peregrine Fund pp. 37–63.

  • Falk K. & Møller S. 2017. Field report 2017: Monitoring of the Peregrine Falcon population in South Greenland. – http://vandrefalk.dk/feltrap/rap2017.pdf (Last accessed on 2018-03-21)

  • Falk K. & Møller S. 1988. Status of the Peregrine Falcon in South Greenland: Population Density and Reproduction. – In: Cade T. J. Enderson J. H. Thelander C. G. & White C. M. (eds.) Peregrine Falcon populations: Their management and recovery. – Proc. 1985 Peregrine Conf. Sacramento The Peregrine Fund Inc. pp. 37–43.

  • Falk K. Møller S. & Burnham W. A. 1986. The Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus in South Greenland. – Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift 80: 113–120.

  • Fisher R. J. Wellicome T. I. Bayne E. M. Poulin R. G. Todd L. D. & Ford A. T. 2015. Extreme precipitation reduces reproductive output of an endangered raptor. – Journal of Applied Ecology 52(6): 1500–1508. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12510

  • Fletcher K. Howarth D. Kirby A. Dunn R. & Smith A. 2013. Effect of climate change on breeding phenology clutch size and chick survival of an upland bird. – Ibis 155(3): 456–463. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12055

  • Franke A. 2017. Priorities for Gyrfalcon research: food weather and phenology in a changing climate. – In: Anderson D. L. McClure C. J. W. & Franke A. (eds.) 2017. Applied raptor ecology: essentials from Gyrfalcon research. – The Peregrine Fund Boise Idaho USA pp. 11–32. DOI: 10.4080/are.2017/001

  • Haest B. Hüppop O. & Bairlein F. 2017. Challenging a 15-year-old claim: The North Atlantic Oscillation index as a predictor of spring migration phenology of birds. – Global Change Biology 24(4): 1523–1537. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14023

  • Lehikoinen A. Lindén A. Byholm P. Ranta E. Saurola P. Valkama J. Kaitala V. & Lindén H. 2013. Impact of climate change and prey abundance on nesting success of a top predator the Goshawk. – Oecologia 171(1): 283–293. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2411-z

  • McDermott M. E. & DeGroote L. W. 2016. Long-term climate impacts on breeding bird phenology in Pennsylvania USA. – Global Change Biology 22(10): 3304–3319. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13363

  • McDonald G P. Olsen P. D. & Cockburn A. 2004. Weather dictates reproductive success and survival in the Australian Brown Falcon Falco berigora. – Journal of Animal Ecology 73(4): 683–692. DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00842.x

  • Mearns R. & Newton I. 1988. Factors affecting breeding success of Peregrines in south Scotland. – The Journal of Animal Ecology 57(3): 903–916. DOI: 10.2307/5100

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 2018. – https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/teleconnections/nao/ (Last accessed on 2018-02-17)

  • NOAA/Climate Prediction Center Internet Team 2012. North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). NOAA. – http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/teledoc/nao.shtml (Last accessed on 2018-02-16)

  • Olsen P. D. & Olsen J. 1988. Breeding of the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus. I. Weather nest spacing and territory occupancy. – Emu 88(4): 195–201. DOI: 10.1071/MU9880195

  • Öberg M. Arlt D. Pärt T. Laugen A. T. Eggers S. & Low M. 2015. Rainfall during parental care reduces reproductive and survival components of fitness in a passerine bird. – Ecology and Evolution 5(2): 345–356. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.134

  • Park J-S. Fong A. Chu V. Holden A. Linthicum J. & Hooper K. 2011. Prey species as possible sources of PBDE exposures for Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus) nesting in major California cities. – Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 60(3): 518–523. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-010-9546-x

  • Parmesan C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. – Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 37: 637–669. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100

  • Pipoly I. Bókony V. Seress G. Szabó K. & Liker A. 2013. Effects of extreme weather on reproductive success in a temperate-breeding songbird. – PloS ONE 8(11): e80033. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080033

  • Robinson B. W. & Prostor M. 2017. Guidelines for conducting a camera study of nesting raptors. – In: Anderson D. L. McClure C. J. W. & Franke A. (eds.) – Applied raptor ecology: essentials from Gyrfalcon research. The Peregrine Fund Boise Idaho USA pp. 283–298. DOI: 10.4080/are.2017/app2

  • Stocker T. F. Qin D. Plattner G-K. Tignor M. Allen S. K. Boschung J. Nauels A. Xia Y. Bex V. & Midgley P. M. 2013. IPCC 2013: summary for policymakers in climate change 2013. – The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  • Sullivan A. R. Flaspohler D. J. Froese R. E. & Ford D. 2015. Climate variability and the timing of spring raptor migration in eastern North America. – Journal of Avian Biology 47: 208–218. DOI: 10.1111/jav.00692

  • Vorkamp K. Falk K. Møller S. Rigét F. F. Bossi R. & Sørensen P. B. 2017. New and updated time trends of persistent organic pollutants and their effects on eggs of Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus) from South Greenland. – Aarhus University DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy 249 pp. 80. http://dce2.au.dk/pub/SR249.pdf

  • Wightman C. S. & Fuller M. R. 2005. Spacing and physical habitat selection patterns of Peregrine Falcons in central West Greenland. – The Wilson Bulletin 117(3): 226–236. DOI: 10.1676/04-036.1

  • White C. M. Clum N. J. Cade T. J. & Hunt W. G. 2002. Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) version 2.0. – In: Poole A. F. & Gill F. B. (eds.) The Birds of North America. – Cornell Lab of Ornithology Ithaca NY USA DOI: 10.2173/bna.660

  • White C. M. Cade T. J. & Enderson J. H. 2013. Peregrine Falcons of the World. – Lynx Edicions
Cover Image of: Ornis Hungarica
Search
Journal information
ISSN:
2061-9588
First Published:
08 Oct 2013
Language:
English
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 177 177 10
PDF Downloads 154 154 6