Eco-geographical variation in the diet of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in mountainous areas of France

Guillaume Halliez 1 , 2 , Clémence Marie Lucie Becel 2  und Victoria Canella 2
  • 1 Chrono-Environnement Laboratory, University of Franche-Comté/CNRS – 16 route de Gray, France
  • 2 Universitary Group of Naturalists of Franche-Comté – 16 route de Gray, France


Because of the worldwide distribution of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and the easily way to find its pellets, it is often used to diet studies. To investigate the eco-geographical impact of mountainous areas on its diet, we conducted studies in the Jura, Alpes, Central and Pyrénées mountains and we also did pellet analysis from 8 sites in the Jura mountains. Analysis of the tooth and skull content of pellets allowed us to draw up two types of change in the diet of Tyto alba in correlation with mountain elevation. The first one concerns the Jura, Alpes and Central mountains, where the diversity of the diet declines with the increase in elevation. The second one concerns the Pyrénées mountains, where there is no change in the diversity of the diet, perhaps because of the higher diversity of small mammals caused by mediterranean influence. Thus, it seems that elevation cau ses a decrease in diet diversity of Tyto alba in continental mountains (Jura, Alpes and Central mountains) probably because of more homogeneous landscapes dedicated to grass production. However, in Mediterranean mountains (Pyrénées), a more diversified small mammal guild provides a constant level of diet diversity.

Falls das inline PDF nicht korrekt dargestellt ist, können Sie das PDF hier herunterladen.

  • Alivizatos, H., Goutner, V., Athanasiadis, A. & Poirazidis, K. 2006. Comparative temporal prey use by Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the Evros Delta, northeastern Greece. – Journal of Biological Research 6: 177–186.

  • Askew, N. P., Searle, J. B. & Moore, N. P. 2007. Agri-environment schemes and foraging of Barn Owls Tyto alba. – Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118: 109–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.003

  • Aulagnier, S. 1982. Notes sur le regime alimentaire de la chouette effraie (Tyto alba) dans une localité de Haute-Loire [Note on diet of Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in Haute-Loire village]. – Le Grand Duc 19: 15–16. (in French)

  • Barčiovẚ, L. & Macholẚn, M. 2009. Morphometric key for the discrimination of two wood mice species, Apodemus sylvaticus and A. flavicollis. – Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 55(1): 31–38.

  • Begall, S. 2005. The relationship of foraging habitat to the diet of Barn Owls (Tyto alba) from central Chile. – Journal of Raptor Research 39(1): 97–101.

  • Bernard, N., Michelat, D., Raoul, F., Quéré, J. P., Delattre, P. & Giraudoux, P. 2010. Dietary response of Barn Owls (Tyto alba) to large variations in populations of Common Voles (Microtus arvalis) and European Water Voles (Arvicola terrestris). – Canadian Journal of Zoology 88: 416–426. DOI: 10.1139/Z10-011

  • Berthier, K., Piry, S., Cosson, J. F., Giraudoux, P., Foltête, J. C., Defaut, R., Truchetet, D. & Lambin, X. 2013. Dispersal, landscape and travelling waves in cyclic vole populations. – Ecology Letters 17(1): 53–64. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12207

  • Boireau, J. 2009. Problèmes posés par l’effraie des clochers Tyto alba dans cinq colonies de reproduction de grand rhinolophe Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (Schreber, 1774) en Bretagne occidentale [Problems caused by Barn Owl Tyto alba presence in five settlements of Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (Schreber, 1774) in occidental Britain]. – Le Rhinolophe 18: 43–49. (in French with English Summary)

  • Bontzorlos, V. A., Peris, S. J., Vlachos, C. G. & Bakaloudis, D. E. 2005. The diet of Barn Owl in the agricultural landscapes of central Greece. – Folia Zoologica 54(1–2): 99–110.

  • Bosè, M. & Guidali, F. 2001. Seasonal and geographic differences in the diet of the Barn Owl in an agro-ecosystem in northern Italy. – Journal of Raptor Research 35(3): 240–246.

  • Chao, A. & Shen, T. J. 2003. Nonparametric estimation of Shannon’s index of diversity when there are unseen species in sample. – Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10: 429–443. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026096204727

  • Colvin, B. A., McLean, E. B. 1986. Food habits and prey specificity of the Common Barn Owl in Ohio. – Ohio Journal of Science 86: 76–80.

  • Corbet, G. B. 1964. The identification of British mammals. – British Museum London, pp. 46

  • Delattre, P., Clarac, R., Melis, J. P., Peydell, D. R. J. & Giraudoux, P. 2006. How moles contribute to colonization success of Water Voles in grassland: implications for control. – Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 353–359. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01134.x

  • Delattre, P., Giraudoux, P., Baudry, J., Musard, P., Toussaint, M., Truchetet, D., Stahl, P., Poule, M. L., Artois, M., Damange, J. P. & Quéré, J. P. 1992. Land use patterns and types of Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) population kinetics. – Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 39: 153–169.

  • Erome, G. & Aulagnier, S. 1982. Contribution à l’identification des proies de rapaces [Contribution to the raptor’s prey identification]. – Bièvre 4: 129–135.

  • Escarlate-Tavares, F. & Pessôa, L. M. 2005. Bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia) in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) pellets in northern Pantanal, Mato Grosso, Brazil. – Mastozoologia Neotropical 12(1): 61–67.

  • Foltête, J. C., Berthier, K. & Cosson, J. F. 2008. Cost distance defined by a topological function of landscape. – Ecological Modelling 210(1–2): 104–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.07.014

  • Fons, R. 1975. Premières données sur l’écologie de la Pachyure étrusque, Suncus etruscus (Savi, 1822) et comparaison avec deux autres Crocidurinae: Crocidura russula (Hermann, 1780) et Crocidura suaveolens (Pallas, 1811), (Insectivora, Soricidae) [First data on Suncus etruscus (Savi, 1822) ecology and comparison with two others Crocidurinae: Crocidura russula (Hermann, 1780) and Crocidura suaveolens (Pallas, 1811), (Insectivora, Soricidae)]. – Revue d’Ecologie (Vie Milieu) 25: 315–360. (in French)

  • Genoud, M. & Hausser, J. 1979. Ecologie d’une population de Crocidura russula en milieu rural montagnard (Insectivora, Soricidae) [Crocidura russula (Insectivora, Soricidae) population ecology in rural mountain ecosystem]. – Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 33: 539–554. (in French with English Summary)

  • Giraudoux, P. 2012. pgirmess: Data analysis in ecology. – R package version 1.5.2.

  • Giraudoux, P., Delattre, P., Habert, M., Quéré, J. P., Deblay, S., Defaut, R., Duhamel, R., Moissenet, M. F., Salvi, D. & Truchetet, D. 1997. Population dynamics of fossorial Water Vole (Arvicola terrestris scherman): a land use and landscape perspective. – Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 66: 47–60.

  • Lange, R. A., Van Winden, P., Twisk, J., De Laender, & Speer, C. 1986. Zoogdieren van de Benelux Herkenning en onderzoek, met uitzondering van de hoefdieren en de zeezoogdieren [Mammals of the Benelux recognition and research, with the exception of marine mammals and ungulates]. – ERLA, Amsterdam, pp. 193 (in Dutch)

  • Leonardi, G. & Dell’Arte, G. L. 2006. Food habits of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in a steppe area of Tunisia. – Journal of Arid Environments 65: 677–681. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.10.007

  • Libois, R. M., Fons, R. & Saint-Girons, M. C. 1983. Le régime alimentaire de la chouette effraie, Tyto alba, dans les Pyrénées-orientales. Etude des variations écogéographiques [Barn Owl’s diet in Pyrénées-orientales. Eco-geographical variation study]. – Revue d’Ecologie (Terre Vie) 37: 187–217. (in French with English Summary)

  • López-i-Gelats, F., Milán, M. J. & Bartolomé, J. 2011. Is farming enough in mountain areas? Farm diversification in the Pyrenees. – Land Use Policy 28: 783–791. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.005

  • Michelat, D. & Giraudoux, P. 1989. Répartition des mammifères proies de la chouette effraie en Franche-Comté [Barn Owl’s mammal preys distribution in Franche-Comté]. – Falco 23: 12–37. (in French)

  • Michelat, D. & Giraudoux, P. 1993. Relation proies-prédateur-paysage chez la chouette effraie Tyto alba pendant l’élevage des jeunes [Prey-predator-landscape relationship for Barn Owl Tyto alba during rearing]. – Alauda 61(2): 65–72. (in French with English Summary)

  • Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H. & Wagner, H. 2014. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-10 [online]. Available from

  • Platt, S. G., Rainwater, T. R., Leavitt, D. J. & Miller, S. M. 2009. Diet of Barn Owls (Tyto alba) in northern Belize. – The Southwestern Naturalist 54(1): 104–107. DOI: 10.1894/MH-43.1

  • Quéré, J. P. & Le Louarn, H. 2011. Les rongeurs de France, faunistique et biologie [French rodents, systematic and biology]. – Quae, Versailles, pp. 311 (in French)

  • Rasoma, J. & Goodman, S. M. 2007. Food habits of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in spiny bush habitat of arid southwestern Madagascar. – Journal of Arid Environments 69: 537–543. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.10.004

  • R Core Team 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. – R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Restoin, J. A. & Restoin, J. 1972. Identification des proies de rapaces d’après les restes trouvés dans les pelotes de réjection [Identification of raptor’s preys from remains in pellets]. – CRDP Besançon, pp. 14 (in French)

  • Rigaux, P. & Riols, C. 2008. Régime alimentaire de l’effraie des clochers (Tyto alba) à Courpière, Val de Dore (Puy-de-Dôme) [Barn Owl diet in Courpières, Val de Dore (Puy-de-Dôme)]. – Le Grand-Duc 73: 27–29. (in French)

  • Roulin, A. & Christe, P. 2013. Geographic and temporal variation in the consumption of bats by European Barn Owls. – Bird Study 60(4): 561–569. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2013.847051

  • Saucy, F. 1994. Density dependence in time series of the fossorial form of the Water Vole, Arvicola terrestris. – Oikos 74: 381–392.

  • Schneider, W. 1964. Die Schteiereule [The Barn Owl]. – Neue Brehm Bücherel. Helt 340, Wittenberg, pp. 104 (in German)

  • Shehab, A., Daoud, A., Kock, D. & Amr, Z. 2004. Small mammals recovered from owl pellets from Syria (Mammalia: Chiroptera, Rodentia). – Zoology in the Middle East 33: 27–42. DOI: 10.1080/09397140.2004.10638061

  • Sommer, R., Niederle, M., Labes, R. & Zoller, H. 2009. Bat predation by the Barn Owl Tyto alba in a hibernation site of bats. – Folia Zoologica 58(1): 98–103.

  • Souza, D. P., Asfora, P. H., Lira, T. C. & Astùa, D. 2009. Small mammals in Barn Owl (Tyto alba – Aves, Strigiformes) pellets from Northeastern Brazil, with new records of Gracilinanus and Cryptonanus (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae). – Mammalian Biology 75: 370–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2009.08.003

  • Taberlet, P. 1983. Evaluation du rayon d’action moyen de la chouette effraie, Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769), à partir de ses pelotes de réjection [Evaluation of the distance of foraging for the Barn Owl, Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769), from pellets]. – La Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 38: 171–177. (in French with English Summary)

  • Taberlet, P. 1986. Etude de l’écologie des micromammifères à partir des pelotes de réjection de Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769), application au Bas-Chablais (Haute-Savoie – France) [Small mammals ecology from Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) pellets, application to the Bas-Chablais (Haute-Svoie – France)]. – La Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 41: 193–217. (in French with English Summary)

  • Taylor, I. 2004. Barn Owls, predator-prey relationships and conservation. – Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 311

  • Tores, M. & Yom-Tov, Y. 2003. The diet of the Barn Owl Tyto alba in the Negev desert. – Israel Journal of Zoology 49: 233–236. DOI: 10.1560/JU3E-EWK4-13QY-CGRF

  • Vargas, J., Landaeta, C. A. & Simonetti, J. A. 2002. Bats as prey of Barn Owls (Tyto alba) in a tropical savanna in Bolivia. – Journal of Raptor Research 36(2): 146–148.


Zeitschrift + Hefte