Demography, breeding success and effects of nest type in artificial colonies of Red-footed Falcons and allies


Shortage of breeding sites is an important limiting factor of bird populations. Artificial breeding platforms, nest-boxes or man-made twig nests often present solutions with remarkable results, however long-term sustainability of these populations remains to be resolved. Furthermore, the question whether the inference of results of studies conducted on birds breeding in artificial breeding sites can be generalized to other populations, still remains open. Here we present the history, and the results of a 20 year old (1995-2015) nest-box programme initiated to increase potential breeding possibilities of Red-footed Falcons in an area, where nest-site shortage was a severe limiting factor. We show how various other species (Jackdaws, Kestrels and Long-eared Owls) have utilized these resources, and present descriptive statistics on their reproductive performance. Analysing the data of a total of 1432 breeding attempts, we show that Red-footed Falcons have similar clutch sizes, and nesting success (i.e. ratio of nests with at least on fledgling), however fledging success (ratio of the number of eggs/fledged nestlings) was different in artificial nest-boxes. When we excluded closed box types from artificial nests, this difference was not apparent. In case of Kestrels (n=1626 breeding attempts) clutch size was significantly higher in artificial nests, while we found no difference in fledging or nesting success. When only comparing open boxes to natural nests, the difference in clutch size was no longer significant. We also analysed the effect of nest box design on reproductive parameters of the two species using regression trees. Inter annual effects were the most important in shaping clutch size and fledging rate of both falcon species, however we also found nest-box design effects, but only in Red-footed Falcons. In years when mean clutch size was high, these birds had lower clutch size in an older, darker nest-box type compared to an alternative design, and to open boxes. However, fledging rate in the same years was lower for both open boxes and older nest-boxes. We conclude that artificial colonies are an important and successful tool in Red-footed Falcon conservation, and that the breeding parameters measured in artificial colonies depend on nest-box design. We present correlative evidence that closed boxes have a significant positive species specific effect on reproduction, probably due to their protection against weather. We also show that birds may have a preference for a certain nest-box design, and that the breeding success in the less favoured box type may be similar to that in open nests. We recommend that future studies incorporate nest-type and nest-box design effects in all comparisons made on reproductive performance in case of Red-footed Falcons and Kestrels.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ángyán, J., Tardy, J. & Vajnáné, M. A. 2002. Védett és érzékeny természeti területek mezőgazdálkodásának alapjai [Agriculture for Environmentally Protected and Sensitive Areas]. – Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 368 (in Hungarian)

  • Bagyura, J. & Palatitz, P. 2004. Fajmegőrzési tervek (Falco vespertinus) [Species Conservation Plans, Red-footed Falcon (Falco vespertinus)]. – Ministry of Environment and Water, Budapest, pp. 39 (in Hungarian)

  • Báldi, A., Batáry, P. & Erdős, S. 2005. Effects of grazing intensity on bird assemblages and populations of Hungarian grasslands. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 108(3): 251–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.02.006

  • Bortolotti, G. R. 1994. Effect of nest-box size on nest-site preference and reproduction in American Kestrels. – Journal of Raptor Research 28(3): 127–133.

  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. A. & Stone, C. J. 1984. Classification and decision trees. – Belmont, Wadsworth CA, pp. 356

  • Bux, M., Giglio, G. & Gustin, M. 2008. Nest box provision for Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni populations in the Apulia region of southern Italy. – Conservation Evidence 5: 58–61.

  • Campobello, D., Sarà, M. & Hare, J. F. 2012. Under my wing: Lesser Kestrels and Jackdaws derive reciprocal benefits in mixed-species colonies. – Behavioral Ecology 23(2): 425–433. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr207

  • Catry, I., Franco, A. M., Rocha, P., Alcazar, R., Reis, S., Cordeiro, A., Ventim, R., Teodósio, J. & Moreira, F. 2013. Foraging habitat quality constrains effectiveness of artificial nest-site provisioning in reversing population declines in a colonial cavity nester. – PloS One 8(3): e58320. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058320

  • Csörgey, T. 1908. A M.O.K. ezévi működése a gyakorlati madárvédelem terén [Annual bird conservation report of the M.O.K.]. – Aquila 15: 302–305. (in Hungarian and German)

  • De’ath, G. 2002. Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species-environment relationships. – Ecology 83(4): 1105–1117. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1105:MRTANT]2.0.CO;2

  • De’ath, G. & Fabricius, K. E. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. – Ecology 81: 3178–3192. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3178:CARTAP]2.0.CO;2

  • Donald, P. F., Pisano, G., Rayment, M. D. & Pain, D. J. 2002. The Common Agricultural Policy, EU enlargement and the conservation of Europe’s farmland birds. – Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 89(3): 167–182. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00244-4

  • Faraway, J. J. 2005. Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. – CRC Press, pp. 331

  • Fargallo, J. A., Blanco, G., Potti, J. & Viñuela, J. 2001. Nestbox provisioning in a rural population of Eurasian Kestrels: breeding performance, nest predation and parasitism. – Bird Study 48(2): 236–244.

  • Fehérvári, P., Harnos, A., Solt, Sz. & Palatitz, P. 2009. Modeling habitat selection of the Red-footed Falcon (Falco vespertinus): A possible explanation of recent changes in breeding range within Hungary. – Applied Ecology and Environment 7(1): 59–69.

  • Fehérvári, P., Lázár, B., Palatitz, P., Solt, Sz., Kotymán, L. & Harnos, A. 2011. Az időjárás hatásai a kék vércse (Falco vespertinus) fészekalj-méretére [The effect of weather on Red-footed Falcon (Falco ves-pertinus) clutch size]. – “Klíma 21” füzetek (65): 53–64. (in Hungarian)

  • Fehérvári, P., Solt, Sz., Palatitz, P., Barna, K., Ágoston, A., Gergely, J., Nagy, A., Nagy, K. & Harnos, A. 2012. Allocating active conservation measures using species distribution models: a case study of Red-footed Falcon breeding site management in the Carpathian Basin. – Animal Conservation 15(6): 648–657. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00559.x

  • Fehérvári, P., Piross, I. S., Soltész, Z., Kotymán, L., Solt, Sz. Horváth, É. & Palatitz, P. 2015. Species specific effect of nest-box cleaning on settlement decisions in an artificial colony system. – Ornis Hungarica 23(1): 66–76. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2015-0006

  • Franco, A., Marques, J. T. & Sutherland, W. J. 2005. Is nest-site availability limiting Lesser Kestrel populations? A multiple scale approach. – Ibis 147(4): 657–666. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00437.x

  • Gottschalk, T. K., Ekschmitt, K. & Wolters, V. 2011. Efficient placement of nest boxes for the Little Owl (Athene noctua). – Journal of Raptor Research 45(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.3356/JRR-09-11.1

  • Hamerstrom, F., Hamerstrom, F. N. & Hart, J. 1973. Nest boxes: an effective management tool for Kestrels. – The Journal of Wildlife Management 37(3): 400–403.

  • Henderson, I., Hart, P. & Burke, T. 2000. Strict monogamy in a semi-colonial passerine: the Jackdaw Corvus monedula. – Journal of Avian Biology 31(2): 177–182. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-048X.2000.310209.x

  • Horváth, É., Solt, Sz., Kotymán, L., Palatitz, P., Piross, I. S. & Fehérvári, P. 2015. Provisioning nest material for Rooks, a potential tool for conservation management – Ornis Hungarica 23(1): 22–31. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2015-0002

  • Jacob, J., Manson, P., Barfknecht, R. & Fredricks, T. 2014. Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) ecology and management: implications for risk assessment of plant protection products. – Pest Management Science 70(6): 869–878. DOI: 10.1002/ps.3695

  • Katzner, T., Robertson, S., Robertson, B., Klucsarits, J., McCarty, K. & Bildstein, K. L. 2005. Results from a long-term nest-box program for American Kestrels: implications for improved population monitoring and conservation. – Journal of Field Ornithology 76(3): 217–226. DOI: 10.1648/02738570-76.3.217

  • Keve, A. & Szijj, J. 1957. Distribution, biologie et alimentation du Facon kobez Falco vespertinus L. en Hongrie [Distribution, biology and allimentation of Red-footed Falcons in Hungary]. – Alauda 25(1): 1–23. (in French)

  • Kiss, O., Elek, Z. & Moskát, C. 2014. High breeding performance of European Rollers Coracias garrulus in heterogeneous farmland habitat in southern Hungary. – Bird Study 61(4): 496–505. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2014.969191

  • Kivelä, S. M., Seppänen, J-T., Ovaskainen, O., Doligez, B., Gustafsson, L., Mönkkönen, M. & Forsman, J. T. 2014. The past and the present in decision-making: the use of conspecific and heterospecific cues in nest site selection. – Ecology 95(12): 3428–3439. DOI: 10.1890/13-2103.1

  • Korpimäki, E. & Norrdahl, K. 1991. Numerical and functional responses of Kestrels, Short-eared Owls, and Long-eared Owls to vole densities. – Ecology 72(3): 814–826. DOI: 10.2307/1940584

  • Kotymán, L. 2001. A vörös vércse (Falco tinnunculus) és a kék vércse (Falco vespertinus) telepítésének gyakorlata a Vásárhelyi-pusztán [Establishing artificial colonies of Kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) and Red-footed Falcons (Falco vespertinus) in the Vásárhelyi-puszta]. – Túzok 6: 120–129. (in Hungarian)

  • Lambrechts, M. M., Wiebe, K. L., Sunde, P., Solonen, T., Sergio, F., Roulin, A., Møller, A. P., López, B. C., Fargallo, J. A., Exo, K-M., Dell’Omo, G., Costantini, D., Charter, M., Butler, M. W., Bortolotti, G. R., Arlettaz, R. & Korpimäki, E. 2012. Nest box design for the study of diurnal raptors and owls is still an overlooked point in ecological, evolutionary and conservation studies: a review. – Journal of Ornithology 153(1): 23–34. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-011-0720-3

  • Mainwaring, M. C. 2015. The use of man-made structures as nesting sites by birds: A review of the costs and benefits. – Journal for Nature Conservation 25: 17–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.007

  • Molnár, G. 2000. A kék vércse, a vörös vércse és az erdei fülesbagoly mesterséges telepítésének eredményei a Dél-Alföldön [The breeding of the Red-footed Falcon (Falco vespertinus), Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) and Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) in artificial nest boxes in the Dél-Alföld region]. – Ornis Hungarica 10: 93–98. (in Hungarian with English Summary)

  • Molnár, G., Bíró, M., Virók, V. & Kotymán, L. 2012. A Vásárhelyi-puszta növényzete és növényzeti változásai az elmúlt 10 évben [Flora and changes in vegetation of the past 10 years in the Vásárhelyi-puszta]. – Cirsicum 7: 57–76. (in Hungarian)

  • Molnár, G. & Tajti, L. 2007. Pusztaszeri Tájvédelmi Körzet. – In: Tardy, J. (ed.) A magyarországi vadvizek világa – Hazánk ramsari területei [The world of Hungarian wetlands]. – Alexandra Kiadó, Pécs, Hungary, pp. 416 (in Hungarian)

  • Newton, I. 2007. Weather-related mass-mortality events in migrants. – Ibis 149(3): 453–467. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00704.x

  • Olden, J. D., Lawler, J. J. & Poff, N. L. 2008. Machine learning methods without tears: a primer for ecologists. – Quarterly Review of Biology 83(2): 171–193. DOI: 10.1086/587826

  • Palatitz, P., Fehérvári, P., Solt, Sz. & Barov, B. 2009. European Species Action Plan for the Red-footed Falcon Falco vespertinus Linnaeus, 1766. – European Comission, pp. 49

  • Palatitz, P., Fehérvári, P., Solt, Sz., Kotymán, L., Neidert, D. & Harnos, A. 2011. Exploratory analyses of foraging habitat selection of the Red-footed Falcon (Falco vespertinus). – Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 57(3): 255–268.

  • Palatitz, P., Fehérvári, P., Solt, Sz. & Horváth, É. 2015. Breeding population trends and pre-migration roost site survey of the Red-footed Falcon in Hungary. – Ornis Hungarica 23(1): 77–93. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2015-0007

  • Parejo, D., Danchin, E. & Avilés, J. M. 2005. The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? – Behavioral Ecology 16(1): 96–105. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arh136

  • Pavey, C. R. & Smyth, A. K. 1998. Effects of avian mobbing on roost use and diet of Powerful Owls, Ninox strenua. – Animal Behaviour 55(2): 313–318. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0633

  • Purger, J. J. & Tepavčević, A. 1999. Pattern analysis of Red-footed Falcon (Falco vespertinus) nests in the Rook (Corvus frugilegus) colony near Torda (Voivodina, Yugoslavia), using fuzzy correspondences and entropy. – Ecological Modelling 117(1): 91–97. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00012-5

  • R Core Team 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. – R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria, Retrieved from

  • Rodriguez, A., Garcia, A. M., Cervera, F. & Palacios, V. 2006. Landscape and anti-predation determinants of nest-site selection, nest distribution and productivity in a Mediterranean population of Long-eared Owls Asio otus. – Ibis 148(1): 133–145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00492.x

  • Soler, M. & Soler, J. J. 1996. Effects of experimental food provisioning on reproduction in the Jackdaw Corvus monedula, a semi-colonial species. – Ibis 138(3): 377–383. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb08054.x

  • Sterbetz, I. 1959. A hódmezővásárhelyi szikesek madárvilága [Birdlife of the alkaline grasslands around Hódmezővásárhely]. – Aquila 65: 189–207. (in Hungarian)

  • Sterbetz, I. 1975. A Kardoskúti Természetvédelmi Terület madárvilága 1952 és 1973 időközében [Birdlife of Kardoskút Nature Protection Area between 1952–1973]. – Aquila 80/81: 91–120. (in Hungarian)

  • Sumasgutner, P., Vasko, V., Varjonen, R. & Korpimäki, E. 2014. Public information revealed by pellets in nest sites is more important than ecto-parasite avoidance in the settlement decisions of Eurasian Kestrels. – Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68(12): 2023–2034. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-0141808-6

  • Tkadlec, E. & Stenseth, N. C. 2001. A new geographical gradient in vole population dynamics. – Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 268(1476): 1547. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1694

  • Tóth, I. 1995. Békés megyei ragadozómadár-állomány helyzete és változása [The status and changes in raptor populations of Békés County]. – MME Kiadvány, pp. 55 (in Hungarian)

  • Vajda, Z. 1992. Vércse-fajok megtelepítése mesterséges fészkekkel [Using nest-boxes to establish small falcon breeding populations]. – Himantopus 1: 7. (in Hungarian)


Journal + Issues