The Use of the Kano Model to Enhance Customer Satisfaction

Open access

Abstract

Background/purpose: The interest of measuring customer satisfaction is reflected in its ability to gain customer loyalty, enhance favourable word of mouth, lead to repeat purchases and improve a company’s market share and profitability. The issue of integrating the Kano model of customer satisfaction with other models and tools to support development or improvement of a product, or to determine market strategies, is relatively unexplored in the Slovenian sector. This research aims to construct the Kano model in order to enhance customer satisfaction in the case of home appliances.

Design/Methodology/Approach: Data was collected using an online survey amongst randomly selected individuals from the service interventions for an end users database. Principal component factor analysis was first used to identify the underlying factors of home appliance characteristics. In the next phase we calculated the derived and stated importance of customer satisfaction, which was then used to construct the Kano model of customer satisfaction. We further analysed which factors are the strongest drivers, or predictors, of repeat purchase using multiple regression analysis.

Results: In the study we identified the underlying home appliance factors. The results show that these factors are: sales environment, price, user features, design features and technical features. The results were then used to construct the Kano model where the analysis goes beyond the qualitative analysis by implementing two approaches, stated and derived importance approach. According to the Kano model, marketers should concentrate on delight characteristics such as: wider knowledge of the salesperson, professional skills of the salesperson, design of home appliance, brand of home appliance. What is more, factors called ‘user features’ are the strongest predictors of repeat purchase.

Conclusion: This paper links the Kano model with measuring customer satisfaction and presents a contribution for marketing research theory. Therefore, the results could be used to support optimization of business decision-making, as well as for further scientific research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aaker D.A. & Joachimsthaler D. (2009). Brand Leadership. London: Pocket.

  • Aaker D.A. (2010). Building Strong Brands. London: Pocket.

  • Aaker D.A. (2005). Strategic Market Management. New York: Wiley.

  • Almquist E. Senior J. & Bloch N. (2016). The elements of value. Measuring and delivering what consumers really want. Harvard Business Review 94(9) 46-53.

  • Anderson E.W. Fornell C. & Lehmann D.R. (1994). Customer satisfaction market share and profitability: findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing 58(3) 53-67 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252310

  • Ažman S. & Gomišček B. (2012). Asymetric and nonlinear impact of attribute-level performance on overall customer satisfaction in the context of car servicing of four European automotive brands in Slovenia. Organizacija 45(2) 75-86 http://dx.doi.orgI10.2478/v10051-012-0008-2

  • Burns A.C. & Bush R.F. (2010). Marketing Research. New York: Pearson Publishing.

  • Butori R. & De Bruyn A. (2013). So you want to delight your customer: the perils of ignoring heterogeneity in customer evaluations of discretionary preferential treatments. International Journal of Research in Marketing 30(4) 358-367 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.03.004

  • Chang Y.C. & Chen C.Y. (2014). Prioritizing 5S activities by Kano model with modified CS coefficient for a semiconductor wafer fabrication during ramp-up stage. The TQM Journal 26(2) 109-124 https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2013-0027

  • Chen C.C. & Chuang M.C. (2008). Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design. International Journal of Production Economics 114(2) 667-681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.015

  • Chernatony L. (2002). Blagovna znamka: od vizije do vrednotenja [From brand vision to brand evaluation]. Ljubljana: GV Založba.

  • Chu R. (2002). Stated-importance versus derived-importance customer satisfaction measurement. The Journal of Services Marketing 16(4) 285-301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876040210433202

  • Ćoćkalo D. Đorđević D. & Sajfert Z. (2011). Customer satisfaction and acceptance of relationship marketing concept: an exploratory study in QM certified Serbian companies. Organizacija 44(2) 32-46 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10051-011-0004-y

  • Di Paula A. (1999). Assessing customer values: stated importance versus derived importance. Marketing News 33(12) 39.

  • Dominici G. Roblek V. Abbate T. & Tani M. (2016). Click and drive: Consumer attitude to product development: Towards future transformations of the driving experience. Business Process Management Journal 22(2) 420-434 https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0076

  • Feinberg F.M. Kinnear T.C. & Taylor J.R. (2013). Modern Marketing Research. Melbourne: South-Western Cengage Learning.

  • Field A.P. (2009). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.

  • Fonseca L. M. (2015). From Quality Gurus and TQM to ISO 9001: 2015: a review of several quality paths. International Journal for Quality Research. 9(1) 167-180.

  • Fontenot G. Henke L. Carson K. & Phillips Carson P. (2007). Techniques for determining importance: balancing scientific method and subjectivity. Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 15(3) 170-180 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5750043

  • Gričar S. & Bojnec Š. (2013). Inflation and hospitality industry prices. Eastern European Economics 51(3) 91-108.

  • Grigoroudis E. & Spyridaki O. (2003). Derived vs. Stated importance in customer satisfaction surveys. Operational Research 3(3) 229-247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02936403

  • Gronholdt L. Martensen A. & Kristensen K. (2000). The relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty: cross-industry differences. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 11(4-6) 509-514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544120050007823

  • Gustavsson S. Gremyr I. & Kenne Sarenmalm E. (2016). Using an adapted approach to the Kano model to identify patient needs from various patient roles. The TQM Journal. 28(1) 151-162 https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2013-0050

  • Iacobucci D. (2013). Marketing models. Australia: South-Western Cengage Learning.

  • Jobber D. (2007). Principles and Practice of Marketing. London: McGraw-Hill.

  • Johansson B. Sudzina F. & Pucihar A. (2014). Alignment of business and information strategies and its impact on business performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management 15(5) 886-898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.749806

  • Južnik Rotar L. & Kozar M. (2012). Exploring the mechanisms for implementing a risk management process: overall approach and practical example. Management 17(64) 77-86 http://dx.doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2012.0023

  • Kano Model Analysis. Retrieved 15.2.2017 from: http://people.ucalgary.ca/~design/engg251/First%20Year%20Files/kano.pdf

  • Kano N. Seracu N. Takahashi F. & Tsuji S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu: The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control 14 39-48.

  • Kobylanski A. & Pawlowska B. (2012). Managing customer satisfaction: a conceptual framework. The Business Review Cambridge 20(1) 33-41.

  • Lilien G. L. Kotler P. & Moorthy K. S. (1992). Marketing Models. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River.

  • Macdonald E.K. Wilson H.N. & Konu ʂ U. (2012). Better customer insight – in real time. Harvard Business Review 90(9) 102-108.

  • Matzler K. Hinterhuber H. H. Bailom F. & Sauerwein E. (1996). How to delight your customers. Journal of Product and Brand Management 5(2) 6-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10610429610119469

  • McElroy J. (1989). QFD: Building the House of Quality. Automotive Industries 4 30-32.

  • Moliner M.A. Sanchez J.S. Rodriguez R.M. & Callarisa L. (2007). Perceived relationship quality and post-purchase perceived value. An integrative framework. European Journal of Marketing 41(11-12) 1392-1422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560710821233

  • Murali S. Pugazhendhi S. & Muralidharan C. (2016). Modelling and investigating the relationship of after sales service quality with customer satisfaction retention and loyalty – a case study of home appliances business. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 30(5) 67-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.01.001

  • Nilsson-Witell L. & Fundin A. (2005). Dynamics of service attributes: a test of Kano‘s theory of attractive quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management 16(2) 152-168 https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230510592289

  • O’Sullivan D. & McCallig J. (2012). Customer satisfaction earnings and firm value. European Journal of Marketing 46(6) 827-843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090561211214627

  • Omachonu V. Johnson W.C. & Onyeaso G. (2008). An empirical test of the drivers of overall customer satisfaction: evidence from multivariate Granger causality. Journal of Services Marketing 22(6) 434-444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876040810901855

  • Park T. & Kim K. J. (1998). Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality. Journal of Operations Management 16(5) 569-581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00029-6

  • Partovi F. Y. (2007). A Quality Function Deployment Approach to Strategic Capital Budgeting. The Engineering Economist 44(3) 239-260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00137919908967522

  • Shahin A. Mohammadi S. Harsij H. & Rahbar Qazi M.R. (2017). Revising satisfaction and dissatisfaction indexes of the Kano model by reclassifying indifference requirements: A case study of the presidential elections. The TQM Journal 29(1) 37-54 https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-05-2015-0059

  • Smith R. E. & Wright W. (2004). Determinants of customer loyalty and financial performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 16(1) 183-205 http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2004.16.1.183

  • Spool J.M. (2011). Understanding the Kano Model – A Tool for Sophisticated Designers. Retrieved 10.2.2017 from: http://www.uie.com/articles/kano_model/.

  • Strandskov J. (2006). Sources of competitive advantages and business performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management 7(3) 119-129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16111699.2006.9636132

  • Šuster Erjavec H. Dmitrović T. & Povalej Bržan P. (2016). Drivers of customer satisfaction in service industries. Journal of Business Economics and Management 17(5) 810-823 http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.860614

  • Taifa I. W. & Desai D. A. (2017). User requirements customization and attractive quality creation for design improvement attributes. International Journal for Quality Research 11(1) 131-148 http://dx.doi.org/10.18421/IJQR11.01-08

  • Tarn J. M. (2004). Customer satisfaction service quality and perceived value: an integrative model. Journal of Marketing Management 20(7-8) 897-917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1362/0267257041838719

  • Trif S.M. (2013). The influence of overall satisfaction and trust on customer loyalty. Management and Marketing 8(1) 109-128.

  • Wen Wu K. (2006). Service quality customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in consumer electronics e-tailers: a structural equation modeling approach. PhD thesis. Lynn University Ann Arbour.

  • Yang Y. Yan H.B. & Ma T. (2015). On Customer Satisfaction of Battery Electric Vehicles Based on Kano Model: A Case Study in Shanghai. In: V.N. Huynh M. Inuiguchi & T. Demoeux (Eds.) Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 9376 (pp. 350-361). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25135-6_33

  • Yeung M. H. & Ennew C. T. (2000). From customer satisfactionto profitability. Journal of Strategic Marketing 8(4) 313-326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09652540010003663

  • Yu S. (2007). An empirical investigation on the economic consequences of customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 18(5) 555-569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783360701240493

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.87

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.179
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.529

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1347 844 44
PDF Downloads 1180 896 83