Industry 4.0 and the New Simulation Modelling Paradigm

Open access

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The aim of this paper is to present the influence of Industry 4.0 on the development of the new simulation modelling paradigm, embodied by the Digital Twin concept, and examine the adoption of the new paradigm via a multiple case study involving real-life R&D cases involving academia and industry.

Design: We introduce the Industry 4.0 paradigm, presents its background, current state of development and its influence on the development of the simulation modelling paradigm. Further, we present the multiple case study methodology and examine several research and development projects involving automated industrial process modelling, presented in recent scientific publications and conclude with lessons learned.

Results: We present the research problems and main results from five individual cases of adoption of the new simulation modelling paradigm. Main lesson learned is that while the new simulation modelling paradigm is being adopted by big companies and SMEs, there are significant differences depending on company size in problems that they face, and the methodologies and technologies they use to overcome the issues.

Conclusion: While the examined cases indicate the acceptance of the new simulation modelling paradigm in the industrial and scientific communities, its adoption in academic environment requires close cooperation with industry partners and diversification of knowledge of researchers in order to build integrated, multi-level models of cyber-physical systems. As shown by the presented cases, lack of tools is not a problem, as the current generation of general purpose simulation modelling tools offers adequate integration options.

Baggia, A., Brezavšček, A., Maletič, M., Šparl, P., Raharjo, H., & Žnidaršič, A. (2016). Awareness and attitude towards green IS in Slovenian enterprises. Organizacija, 49(1), 15-27, https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2016-0001

Barlas, P., & Heavey, C. (2016). Automation of Input Data to Discrete Event Simulation for Manufacturing: A Review. International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing, 7(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793962316300016

Bengtsson, P. (1999). Multiple Case Studies - not just more data points?! Ronneby, Sweden: Department of Software Engineering, University of Karlskrona Ronneby, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.30.9769

Borshchev, A. (2013). The Big Book of Simulation Modeling. AnyLogic North America.

Conner, W. R. (1990). Automated Petri net modeling of military operations. IEEE Proceedings of the IEEE 1990 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference - NAECON 1990 (pp. 624-627). Dayton, Ohio, USA: IEEE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1990.112838

Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Goldsman, D., Nance, R. E., & Wilson, J. R. (2010). A brief history of simulation. In M. D. Rossetti, R. R. Hill, B. Johansson, A. Dunkin, & R. G. Ingalls (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 310-313). IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2009.5429341

Goossens, P. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the Power of the Digital Twin. Retrieved 5 3, 2017, from Design News Direct, http://directory.designnews.com/Industry4.0-file073448.pdf

Gradišar, D., & Mušič, G. (2012). Automated Petri-Net Modelling for Batch Production Scheduling. In P. Pawlewski (Ed.), Petri Nets - Manufacturing and Computer Science (pp. 3-26). InTech, https://doi.org/10.5772/48467

GTAI. (2016, 5 11). INDUSTRIE 4.0, Smart Manufacturing for the Future. Retrieved 4 15, 2017, from Germany trade & invest Web site, https://www.gtai.de/GTAI/Navigation/EN/Invest/Service/Publications/business-information,t=industrie-40--smart-manufacturing-for-the-future,did=917080.html

Harrell, C. R., & Hicks, D. A. (1998). Simulation software component architecture for simulation-based enterprise applications. In M. D. J, W. E. F, C. J. S, & M. M. S (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 1717-1721). Piscataway: IEEE.

Jain, S., & Lechevalier, D. (2016). Standards based generation of a virtual factory model. In P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, & S. E. Chick (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC ‘16) (pp. 2762-2773). Piscataway: IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2016.7822313

Kannan, R. M., & Santhi, H. M. (2013). Automated construction layout and simulation of concrete formwork systems using building information modeling. In D. Hardjito, & Antoni (Ed.), Proceedings of The 4th International Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum 2013 (EACEF 2013). 64, pp. C7-C12. Surabaya: National University of Singapore, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.191

Kirchhof, P. (2016). Automatically generating flow shop simulation models from SAP data. In P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, & S. E. Chick (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 3588-3589). Piscataway: IEEE.

Kljajić, M. (2002). Teorija sistemov [Systems Theory]. Kranj: Moderna organizacija.

Kljajić, M., Bernik, I., & Škraba, A. (2000). Simulation Approach to Decision assessment in Enterprises. Simulation, 75(4), 199-210, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F003754970007500402

KPMG. (2016, 06 02). The Factory of the Future - Industry 4.0: The challenges of tomorrow. Retrieved 4 20, 2017, from KPMG Web site: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/05/factory-future-industry-4.0.pdf

Lattner, A. D., Bogon, T., Lorion, Y., & Timm, I. J. (2010). A knowledge-based approach to automated simulation model adaptation. In S. Biaz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference (SpringSim ‘10) (pp. 200-207). San Diego: Society for Computer Simulation International, https://doi.org/10.1145/1878537.1878697

Law, A. M. (2014). Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 5th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Marolt, M., Lenart, G., Maletič, D., Kljajić Borštnar, M., & Pucihar, A. (2016). Business model innovation : insights from a multiple case study of Slovenian SMEs. Organizacija, 49(3), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2016-0015

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Robson, C. (1993). Real World Research : A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rodič, B., & Kanduč, T. (2015). Optimisation of a complex manufacturing process using discrete event simulation and a novel heuristic algorithm. International Journal Of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 2015(9), https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM15(2)7.335

Rodič, B., & Kljajić, M. (2005). Mobile agents and XML for distributed simulation support. Simulation based decision support. Organizacija, 38(9), 490-498.

Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., & Bettenhausen, K. D. (2015). About The Importance of Autonomy and Digital Twins for the Future of Manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 567-572, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Stark, R., Kind, S., & Neumeyer, S. (2017). Innovations in digital modelling for next generation manufacturing system design. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.045

Thiers, G. S., Graunke, A., & Christian, M. (2016). Automated production system simulations using commercial off-the-shelf simulation tools. In P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, & S. E. Chick (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 1036-1047). Piscataway: IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2016.7822163

Uhlemann, T. H.-J., Lehmann, C., & Steinhilper, R. (2017). The Digital Twin: Realizing the Cyber-Physical Production System for Industry 4.0. V S. Takata, Y. Umeda, & S. Kondoh (Ured.), Procedia CIRP: Proceedings of The 24th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering (pp. 335–340). Kamakura: Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.152

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. London: SAGE.

Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 2007(9), 1-6. Retrieved from http://psyking.net/htmlobj-3837/case_study_as_a_research_method.pdf

Organizacija

Journal of Management, Informatics and Human Resources

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.43

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.154
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.040

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1069 1008 110
PDF Downloads 812 784 82