Systemic Outlook in Technology- Management Trends of Best Technology/ICT Companies

Open access

In the last time, new technology generations in many industries are presented every 2-3 years. The next technology revolution is expected to be different from the previous ones because technology is present in every aspect of our society. Technology processes have more and more an interdisciplinary character, therefore must be carried out systematically and if possible in a planned form. From integration of technology processes; to customer insights that drive product and brand extensions; to spotting emerging voids that competitors miss; technology-management trends are of tremendous importance for optimum business growth and profit. The main goal of this paper is to examine particular trends related to technology-management, as well as selected business indicators of the most successful technology/ICT companies in the world. The research methodology was based on the extensive study of innovative activities described in the annual and related reports of the most profitable technology businesses.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Accenture (2010). Accenture Technology Vision 2010: Everything Elastic Accenture. Available at http://www.accenture.com/us-en/pages/insight-future-information-technology.aspx May 2012.

  • Accenture (2011): Accenture Technology Vision 2011: The Technology Waves that are Reshaping the Business Landscape Accenture. Available at http://www.accenture.com/us-en/technology/technology-labs/Pages/insight-accenture-technologyvision-2011.aspx June 2012.

  • Accenture (2012a). Accenture Technology Vision 2012: Emerging Technology Trends for IT Leaders Accenture. Available at http://www.accenture.com/us-en/technology/technology-labs/Pages/insight-accenture-technology-vision-2012.aspx July 2012.

  • Accenture (2012b). Context-based Services Accenture. Available at http://www.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/contextbasedservices.pdf July 2012.

  • Alto P. (2011). HP Technology Consulting Services Help Clients Align its Strategy with Business Goals HP. Available at http:// www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2011/110425xa.html April 2011.

  • Apple (2011). Annual report 2011 Apple. Available at: http:// investor.apple.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1193125-11-282113&CIK=320193 January 2013.

  • Arch-int S. & Batanov D. N. (2003). Development of industrial information systems on the web using business components. Computers in Industry 50(2) 231-250 http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0166-3615(02)00122-7

  • BLS.GOW (2012). Occupational Employment Statistics Bureau ofLabor Statistics. Avalable at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/ oes151132.htm June 2012.

  • Bohr M.T. (1996). Technology development strategies for the 21st century. Applied Surface Science 100/101 534-540 http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(96)00335-2

  • Boomer L.G. (2006). The 10 rules of technology management. Accounting Today February 20-23 ISSN: 1044-5714.

  • Brem A. & Voigt K. (2009). Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management-Insights from the German software industry. Technovation. 29(5) 351-367 . 2008.06.003

  • Cetindamar D. Wasti S.N. Ansal H. & Beyhan B. (2009). Does technology management research diverges or converges in developing and developed countries?. Technovation 29 45-58 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.technovation.2008.04.002

  • CISCO (2011). Annual report 2011 Cisco. Available at http://www.cisco.com/assets/cdc_content_elements/docs/annualreports/media/2011-ar.pdf January 2013.

  • DELL (2011). Annual report 2011 Dell. Available at http://i.dell. com/sites/content/corporate/secure/en/Documents/FY11_YIR_ Letter_with10K.pdf June 2012.

  • DELL (2012). Dell to dole out more cash corporate push quickens Reuters. Available from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/12/us-dell-dividend-idUSBRE85B1FA20120612 July 2012.

  • Drejer A. (1997). The discipline of management of technology based on considerations related to technology. Technovation 17(5) 253-265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(96)00107-1

  • Farrukh C. Fraser P. Hadjidakis D. Phaal R. Probert D. & Tainsh D. (2004). Developing an integrated technology management process. Research Technology Management 47(4) 39-46.

  • Fei-Yue W. Carley K.M. Zeng D. & Mao W. (2007). Social Computing: From Social Informatics to Social Intelligence. Intelligent Systems IEEE 22(2) 79-83 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.41

  • FORTUNE (2009a). 20 most profitable tech companies MagazineFortune. Available at http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0804/gallery.tech_profits.fortune/12.html March 2010.

  • FORTUNE (2009b). Fortune 500 Magazine Fortune. available at http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/full_list/401_500.html March 2010.

  • FORTUNE (2012). Global 500 Magazine Fortune. Available at http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2011/index.html June 2012.

  • Google (2011). Annual report 2011 Google. Available at http://investor.google.com/proxy.html June 2012.

  • Google (2012). Google drive Google Available at https://drive.google.com/start?continue=http://drive.google.com/%23#home January 2013.

  • Guice J. (1999). Designing the future: the culture of new trends in science and technology. Research Policy 28 81-98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00105-X

  • Hempfield C.W. (2011). Data Quality? That’s IT’s problem not mine Pitney Bowes Business Insight. Available at www.personallypb .

  • Hodgson P.D. & Cardew-Hall M.J. (1998). Process and product integration: research challenges. Journal of MaterialsProcessing Technology 80-81 1-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00204-0

  • HP (2011). Annual report 2011 HP. Available at http://h30261.www3.hp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71087&p=irol-reportsannual June 2012.

  • IBM (2011). Annual report 2011 IBM. Available at http://www.ibm.com/annualreport/2011/bin/assets/2011_ibm_annual.pdf June 2012.

  • IBM (2012a). IBM SmartCloud Entry IBM. Available at http:// www-03.ibm.com/systems/x/solutions/cloud/starterkit/index. html July 2012.

  • IBM (2012b). Improving operational decision making for competitive advantage IBM. Available at http://www-01.ibm.com/software/de/beweglich-bleiben/pdf/BPM/Improving-operationaldecisionmaking- for-competitive-advantage.pdf July 2012.

  • INTEL (2011). Annual report 2011 Intel. Available at http:// www.intc.com/intelAR2011/common/pdfs/Intel_2011_Annual_Report_and_Form_10-K.pdf June 2012.

  • Jemala Ľ. (2010). Innovation of Leadership and Management. ForumStatisticum Slovacum VII(4) 45-51 ISSN: 1336-7420.

  • Jemala M. (2010). Evolution of Foresight in the Global Historical Context. Foresight 12 (4) 65-81 ISSN: 1463-6689.

  • Jemala M. (2012). Nature of Foresight Planning. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Saarbrucken ISBN: 978-3659131509.

  • JRC (2009). The 2009 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Edificio Expo November ISBN: 978-92-79-14058-7.

  • JRC (2011). The 2011 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Edificio Expo November ISBN: 978-92-79-21604-6.

  • Kaplinski O. (2009). Problems of the information technologies use in Polish construction sector: State of the art. Achives of CivilEngineering 55(2) 173-197 ISSN: 1230-2945.

  • Kepczyk R. H. (2004). Technology-Resources. Strategic Technology Management. Tax Practice Management May-June 11-12 ISSN: 1541-9169.

  • Kim J. Suh W. & Lee H. (2003). Hypermedia modeling for linking knowledge to data warehousing system. Expert Systems withApplications 24 103-114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00088-X .

  • Larson Ch. F. (2007). 50 years of change in industrial research and technology management. Research and technology management January-February 26-31 ISSN: 0895-6308.

  • Lee S. Mortara L. Kerr C. Phaal R. & Probert D. (2011). Corporate document mining for technology intelligence: An analysis of needs utilisation and possibilities. InternationalJournal of Technology Intelligence and Planning. 7(2) 110-127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2011.043197

  • Leifer R. McDdermott Ch.M. O’Connor G.C. & Peters L.S. (2000). Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies CanOutsmart Upstarts. Boston: Harvard Business School Press ISBN: 978-0875-849-034.

  • Liao S. (2005): Technology management methodologies and applications: A literature review from 1995 to 2003. Technovation 24(4) 381-393 .2003.08.002

  • Microsoft (2011). Annual report 2011 Microsoft. Available at http:// www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar11/download_center.html June 2012.

  • Microsoft (2012a). Cloud Computing Microsoft. Available at http:// www.microsoft.com/enterprise/viewpoints/cloud-services/default.aspx#fbid=lxWjNXhGTrf July 2012.

  • Microsoft (2012b). Machine Learning and Applied Statistics Microsoft research. Available at http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/groups/mlas/ July 2012.

  • Nieto B.W. Luna A.C. & Ramos R.J. (2010). A Model of Technological Platform for the Knowledge Management Organization. World Academy of Science Engineering andTechnology 63 399-403 ISSN: 2010-376X.

  • Oracle (2011). Annual report 2011 Oracle. Available at http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/investor-relations/financials/10k-2011-423237.pdf June 2012.

  • Pelc K. I. (2002). Knowledge Mapping. The Consolidation of the Technology Management Discipline. Knowledge Technologyand Policy 15(3) 36-44 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12130-002-1003-3

  • Poole S. & Simon M. (1997). Technological trends product design and the environment. Design Studies 18(3) 237-248 ISSN: 0142-694X.

  • QUALCOMM (2011). Annual report 2011 Qualcomm. Available at http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/QCOM/1924045956x0x523322/6ebeb924-8e0d-4829-b233-2ed3d7fd3625/2011_Annual_Report_on_Form_10-K.pdf June 2012.

  • Reddy P. (1997). New trends in globalization of corporate R&D and implications for innovation capability in host countries: a survey from India. World Development 25(11) 1821-1837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00079-X

  • Reuters (2012). Talk of Microsoft tablet resurfaces Microsoft. Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/15/usmicrosoft-windows-tablet-idUSBRE85E1K020120615 June 2012.

  • Roberts Ch.B. (1996). The Impact of IT on the Management of System Design. Technology in Society 18(3) 333-355 ISSN: 0160-791X.

  • Rubenstein A. H. (1994). Trends in Technology Management Revisited. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 41(4) 335-341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/17.364555

  • Sahlman K. (2010). Elements of strategic technology management University of Oulu. Available at http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9789514262500/isbn9789514262500.pdf June 2012.

  • Sahlman K. & Haapasalo H. (2009). Perceptions of Strategic Management of Technology in Small High-Tech Enterprises. In PICMET 2009 Proceedings August 2-6 2009 Portland Oregon USA.

  • Saloner G. Shepard A. & Podolny J. (2001). Strategic management. New York: John Wiley and Sons ISBN: 978-0-470-00947-5.

  • Schain M. A. & Judt T. (2001). The Marshall Plan: Fifty Years After(Europe in Transition: The NYU European Studies) New York: Palgrave Macmillan ISBN: 0312229623.

  • Solow R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39 312-330.

  • Spath D. Renz K.Ch. & Seidenstricker S. (2009). Technology management. In Schlick C.M.: Industrial Engineering andErgonomics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag ISBN: 978-3-642-01293-8.

  • Stock G. N. & Tatikonda M. V. (2008). The joint influence of technology uncertainty and interorganizational interaction on external technology integration success. Journal ofOperations Management 26 65-80 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.04.003

  • Telecoms (2011). Qualcomm posts sharp rise in profit for 2011 Telecoms. Available at http://www.telecoms.com/35943/qualcomm-posts-sharp-rise-in-profit-and-revenue-for-2011/ July 2012.

  • Westkämper E. (2007). Strategic Development of Factories under the Influence of Emergent Technologies. CIRP Annals- Manufacturing Technology 56(1) 419-422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.100

  • Yanez M. Khalil T. M. & Walsh S. T. (2010). IAMOT and Education: Defining a Technology and Innovation Management (TIM) Body-of-Knowledge (BoK) for graduate education (TIM BoK). Technovation 30(7-8) 389-400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.007

  • Zamora E. A. (2010). A Management of Technology Framework for MSME Success and Sustainability. Philippine Management Review 17 21-51 ISSN: 1656-5363.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.87

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.179
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.529

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 219 131 10
PDF Downloads 140 109 14