Why European Subordinates Trust their Managers

Open access


This article addresses the problem of why subordinates trust their managers based on the responses from 108 subordinates of seven Slovenian managers and from 138 subordinates of eight Swedish managers. The subordinates of these managers responded to a 20-item instrument tested for reliability and validity. In both samples the managers enjoyed different degrees of trust. The level of trust vested in Slovenian managers was higher than in Swedish ones. The kinds of managers’ actions that enhanced trust were similar amongst Swedish and Slovenian subordinates. Different socio-cultural contexts may theoretically explain why some other kinds of actions had contrasting effects between the samples. On the whole, the actions of managers explain trust in both countries. Subordinates’ trust in managers declines with the increasing hierarchical distance in both national samples. Managers need to show in action that they trust their subordinates, promote their interests, demonstrate appreciation of their subordinates, and solve problems.

  • Andersen, J.A. (2005). Trust in managers: a study of why Swedish subordinates trust their managers. Business Ethics - A European Review, 14(4), 392-404, http://dx.doi:.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2005.00420.x

  • Atkinson, S. (2004). Senior management relationship and trust: an exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 571-587, http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1108/02683940410551499

  • Atkinson, S. & Butcher, D. (2003). Trust in managerial relationships. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(4), 282-304, http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1108/02683940310473064

  • Bagozzi, R.P. (1994). Measurement in marketing research: Basic principles of questionnaire design. In: Bagozzi, R.P. (ed.). Principles of marketing research (pp. 1-49), Cambridge, MA.: Blackwell.

  • Barney, J.B. & Hansen, M.H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(8), 175-190, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150912

  • Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.

  • Bhattacharya, R., Devinney, T.M. & Pillutla, M.M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 23, 459-472, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926621

  • Bigley, G.A. & Pearce, J.L. (1998). Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 405-421, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926618

  • Bijlsma-Frankema, K. (2000). Correlates of trust in a general hospital. In: Rahim, A. Golembiewski, R.T. & Mackenzie, K.D. (eds.). Current topics in management, pp. 141-166. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  • Bijlsma-Frankema, K. (2002). Enabling organisational learning and trust in top management: Case of a mental health care organisation. Proceedings,Workshop on Trust. Brussels: EIASM.

  • Biljsma, K.M. & van de Bunt, G. (2003). Antecedents to trust in managers: a ‘bottom-up’ approach. Personnel Review, 32, 638-664, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00483480310488388

  • Bijlsma-Frankema, K., de Jong, B. & van de Bunt, G.G. (2008). Heed, a missing link between trust, monitoring and performance in knowledge intensive teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 19-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190701763800

  • Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

  • Dirks, K.T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA Basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004-1012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.1004

  • Dirks, K.T. & Ferrin, D.L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Metaanalytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611

  • Dirks, K.T. & Skarlicki, D.P. (2004). Trust in leaders: Existing research and emerging issues. In: Kramer, R.M. & Cook, K.S. (eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations, pp. 21-40, New York: Russell Sage.

  • Doney, P.M., Cannon, J.P. & Mullen, M.R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust.Academy of Management Review, 23, 601-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926629

  • The Edelman Trust Barometer (2009), Retrieved March 2010, from http://www.edelman.com, trust, 2009.

  • Elangovan, A.R., Auer-Rizzi, W. & Szabo, E. (2007). Why don’t I trust you now? An attributional approach to erosion of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(1), 4-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940710721910

  • Ferrin, D.L. & Gillespie, N. (2010). Trust differences across nationalsocietal cultures: much to do, or much ado about nothing? In: Sauders, M., Skinner, D. Dietz, G., Gillespie, N. & Lewicki, R.J. (eds.), Organizational trust. A cultural perspective, (pp. 42-86). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763106.003

  • Fleishman, E.A. & Harris, E.F. (1962). Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 15(1). 43-56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1962.tb01845.x

  • Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In: Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations (pp. 213- 237). Oxford: Basil Blackwell,.

  • Halman, L. (2003). The European values study: The third wave.Source book of the 1999-2000 European values study survey. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. London: McGraw- Hill.

  • Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, J.G. (2004). Cultures and organizations: Software for the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W. & Gupta, V. (eds.) (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. TheGLOBE study of 62 societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Joseph, E.E. & Winston, B.E. (2005). A correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizational trust. Leadership& Organizational Development Journal, 26(1): 6-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437730510575552

  • Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence and trust: problems and alternatives. In: Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust: Making and breakingco-operative relations (pp. 213-237). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Lämsä, A-M. & Pucetaite, R. (2006). Development of organizational trust among employees from a contextual perspective. BusinessEthics: A European Review, 15(2), 130-141, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00437.x

  • Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258792

  • Morgan, D.E. & Zeffane, R. (2003). Employee involvement, organizational change and trust in management. International Journalof Human Resource Management, 14(1), 55-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190210158510

  • Nunally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Poon, J.M.L. (2006). Trust-in-supervisor and helping coworkers: moderating effect of perceived politics. Journal ofManagerial Psychology, 21(6), 518-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940610684373

  • Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S. & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academyof Management Review, 23, 393-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617

  • Rus, A. & Iglič, H. (2005). Trust, governance and performance: the role of institutional and interpersonal trust in SME development. International Sociology, 20, 371-391, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268580905055481

  • Seligman, A.B. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.

  • Sitkin, S.B. & Roth, N.L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust, distrust. Organization Science, 4, 367-403, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.3.367

  • Sheppard, B.H. & Sherman, D.M. (1998). The grammars of trust: a model and general implications. Academy of ManagementReview, 23, 422-437, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259287

  • van Deth, J.W., Montero, J.R. & Westholm, A. (eds.) (2007). Citizenship and Involvement. In: European democracy. A comparativeanalysis (pp 66-87), London: Routledge.

  • Wade, M.D. (2003). Differences in values, practices, and systems among Hungarian managers and Western expatriates. Journal ofWorld Business, 38, 224-244.

  • Whitener, E.M., Brodt, S.E., Korsgaard, M.A. & Werner, J.M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513-530, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259292

  • Wicks, A.C. & Berman, S.L. (2004). The effects of context on trust in firm - stakeholder relationships. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(1), 141-160, http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20041411


Journal of Management, Informatics and Human Resources

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 12 12 12
PDF Downloads 1 1 1