Important problems of future thermonuclear reactors

Open access


This paper concerns important and difficult problems connected with a design and construction of thermonuclear reactors, which have to use nuclear fusion reactions of heavy isotopes of hydrogen, i.e., deuterium (D) and tritium (T). There are described conditions in which such reactions can occur, and different methods of a high-temperature plasma generation, i.e., high-current electrical discharges, intense microwave pulses, and injection of energetic neutral atoms (NBI). There are also presented experimental facilities which can contain hot plasma for an appropriate period, and particularly so-called tokamaks. The second part presents the technical problems which must be solved in order to build a thermonuclear reactor, that might be used for energetic purposes. There are considered problems connected with a choice of constructional materials for a vacuum chamber, its internal parts, external windings generating a magnetic field, and necessary shields. The next part considers the handling of radioactive tritium; the using of alpha particles (4He) for additional heating of plasma; recuperation of hydrogen isotopes absorbed in the tokamak internal parts, and a removal of a helium excess. There is presented a scheme of a future thermonuclear power plant and critical comments on a road map which should enable the construction of an industrial thermonuclear reactor (DEMO).

1. Ongena, J. (2014). How to shape our future energy supply. In Proceedings of 12th Kudowa Summer School “Towards Fusion Energy”, 9–13 June 2014, Kudowa Zdroj, Poland (p. IL-1). Warsaw: IPPLM. CD Issue.

2. Culham Centre for Fusion Energy,

3. Conn, R. W., Chuyanov, V. A., Inoue, N., & Sweetman, D. R. (1992). The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. Sci. Am., 266(4), 103–110. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0492-102.

4. Sadowski, M. J. (2005). Nuclear fusion – energy for future. Nukleonika, 50(Suppl. 3), S41–S52.

5. Vandenplas, P. E. (1980). Reflections on the past and future of fusion and plasma physics research. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 40, 77–85.

6. Rhodes, R. (1995). Dark Sun; The making of the hydrogen bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster.

7. Sadowski, M. J., & Scholz, M. (2012). Important issues of high-current plasma experiments of the Z-pinch type. Nukleonika, 57(1), 11–24.

8. Hurricane, O. A., Callahan, D. A., Casey, D. T., Celliers, P. M., Cerjan, C., Dewald, E. L., Dittrich, T. R., Döppner, T., Hinkel, D. E., Berzak Hopkins, L. F., Kline, J. L., Le Pape, S., Ma, T., MacPhee, A. G., Milovich, J. L., Pak, A., Park, H. -S., Patel, P. K., Remington, B. A., Salmonson, J. D., Springer, P. T., & Tomassini, R. (2014). Fuel gain exceeding unity in an inertially confined fusion implosion. Nature, 506, 343–348. DOI: 10.1038/nature13008.

11. Todd, T. N. (2012). The engineering design of ITER. In Proceedings of 11th Kudowa Summer School “Towards Fusion Energy”, 11–15 June 2012, Kudowa Zdroj, Poland. (p. IL-6), Warsaw: IPPLM. CD Issue.

12. Pinches, S. D. (2014). Physics challenges and status of ITER. In Proceedings of 12th Kudowa Summer School “Towards Fusion Energy”, 9–13 June 2014, Kudowa Zdroj, Poland. (p. IL-6). Warsaw: IPPLM. CD Issue.

13. Garin, P., & Sugimoto, M. (2011). IFMIF’s new design; Status after 2 years of the EVEDA project. J. Nucl. Mater., 417(1/3), 1262–1266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.272.

14. Todd, T. N. (2014). The technical challenges of DEMO. In Proceedings of 12th Kudowa Summer School “Towards Fusion Energy”, 9–13 June 2014, Kudowa Zdroj, Poland. (p. IL-15). Warsaw: IPPLM. CD Issue.


The Journal of Instytut Chemii i Techniki Jadrowej

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.720
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.610

CiteScore 2017: 0.64

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.294
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.509


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 110 110 18
PDF Downloads 31 31 5