Inconsistencies in the Production Process Resulting From the Employment Structure

Open access


Underestimating the duration of the production process is one of the basic factors determining the occurrence of delays in the duration of individual operations included in the production process. Occurrence of underestimation of production time brings many negative effects, which include, among others: underestimation of the company’s production capacity, accumulation of intermediate stocks, impeded planning of the production process (scheduling of the production process) and increase of production costs. The problem of erroneous estimation of the duration of the production process is most often found in production plants specializing in serial or mass production, implemented in a parallel or series-parallel system. The basic causes that underestimate the duration of the production process include errors in production scheduling, incorrect determination of durations of individual operations carried out as part of the analyzed production process, complexity of production operations and employment structure. The occurrence of delays in the production process can also be affected by accident events that generate underestimation and costs for the enterprise (including social and economic costs). In many cases, many algorithms are used to reduce underestimation and optimization and scheduling of the entire production process. The publication presents an analysis of the production process in which the duration of the production process is underestimated, taking into account the employment structure in the manufacturing company. The analyzes allow to determine the level of underestimation of operations of the production process depending on the form of employment (steel workers – employed under a contract of employment in the production plant, and temporary workers employed by temporary work agencies), identification of the reasons for the underestimation of individual production positions and the length of their time occurrence.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bokranz R. and Landau K. (2012) Handbuch Industroal Engineering: Produktivitatsmanagement mit MTM. Band 1: Konzept 2. Auflage. Schaffer-Poeschel Stuttgart.

  • Bożejko W. Grymin R and Pempera J. (2018). Scheduling and Routing Algorithms for Rail Freight Transportation Procedia Engineering pp. 206-212.

  • Bożejko W. Pempera J and Smutnicki A. (2008). Parallel Single-Thread Strategies in Schedu-ling in Rutkowski L. Tadeusiewicz R. Zadeh L.A and Zurada J.M. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing ICAISC 2008 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5097 Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp. 995-1006.

  • Burduk A. Musiał K.Kochańska J. Górnicka D and Stetsenko A. (2019). Tabu search and genetic algorithm for production process scheduling problem Scientific Journal of Logistics 2019 pp 181-189.

  • Chen L. Jansen K. and Zhang G. (2018). On the optimality of exact and approximation algorithms for scheduling problems Journal of Computer and System Sciences pp. 1-32

  • Gawlik J. Plichta J. and Świć A. (2013). Procesy produkcyjne Warszawa Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.

  • Górnicka D. Markowski M. and Burduk A. (2018). Optimization of production organization in a packaging company by ant colony algorithm in Burduk A. Mazurkiewicz D. (Ed.) ISPEM 2017 AISC 637 Springer pp. 336-346

  • Grajek M. and Zmuda-Trzebiatowski P. (2014). A heuristic approach to the daily delivery scheduling problem. Case study: alcohol products delivery scheduling within intracommunity trade legislation Logforum pp. 163-173.

  • Imai M. (2006). Gemba Kaizen Warszawa MT Biznes.

  • Kotowska J. Markowski M. and Burduk A. 2018. Optimization of the Supply of Components for Mass Production with the Use of the Ant Colony Algorithm in Burduk A. Mazurkiewicz D. (Ed.) ISPEM 2017 AISC 637 Springer Cham 347-357.

  • Kowalska K. Sikora L and Hadaś Ł. (2017). Analiza zakłóceń procesu produkcyjnego na wybranym przykładzie Zeszyt Naukowy Politechniki Poznańskiej Organizacja i Zarządzanie Poznań pp. 145-158.

  • Kumanan S. and Jegan Jose G and Raja K. (2006). Multi-project scheduling using an heuristic and a genetic algorithm pp. 360-366.

  • Kutschenreiter-Praszkiewicz I. (2016). Wybrane zagadnienia planowania procesu produkcyjnego. In: Innowacje w Zarządzaniu i Inżynierii Produkcji Opole.

  • Leong G.K. Snyder D.L and Ward P.T. (1990) Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy Omega pp. 114.

  • Małysa T Nowacki K and Lis T. (2017). The correlation between structure of employment and accidents at work in metallurgical enterprises. In: METAL 2017: 26th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials pp. 2244-2249.

  • Morlock F. Kreggenfald N. Louw L. Kreimeier D. Kuhlenkotter B. (2017) Teaching Methods-Time Measurment (MTM) for Workplace Design in Learning Factories 7th Conference on Learning Factories CLF 2017 pp 370-375.

  • Paprocka I. Gwiazda A and Baczkowicz M. (2017). Scheduling of an assembly process of a chosen technical mean using the critical chain approach MATEC Web of Conferences.

  • Pawlak Sz. and Miranowicz A. (2017). Wpływ czynników techniczno-ludzkich na plan procesu produkcji. Częstochowa.

  • Wojakowski P. (2011). Metoda szacowania długości okresu planowania z zastosowaniem techniki eksploracji danych. In: Czasopismo Techniczne Kraków Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej pp. 127-146.

  • Shishido H.Y. Estrella J.C. Toledo C.F.M. and Arantes M.S. (2018). Genetic-based algorithms applied to a workflow scheduling algorithm with security and deadline constraints in clouds Computers & Electrical Engineering pp. 378-394.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 40 40 7
PDF Downloads 35 35 7