Debt Shifting and Thin-Capitalization Rules – German Experience and Alternative Approaches

Open access

Abstract

This paper presents the general design of thin-capitalization rules and summarizes the economic effects of such rules as identified in theoretical models. We review empirical studies providing evidence on the experience with (German) thin-capitalization rules as well as on the adjustment of German multinationals to foreign thin-capitalization rules. Special emphasis is given to the development in Germany, because Germany went a long way in limiting interest deductibility by enacting a drastic change in its thin-capitalization rules in 2008, and because superb German data on multinational finance allows for testing several aspects consistently. We then discuss the experience of the Nordic countries with thin-capitalization rules. Briefly reviewing potential alternatives as well, we believe that the arm’s-length principle is administratively too costly and impracticable, whereas we argue that controlled-foreign-company rules might be another promising avenue for limiting internal debt shifting. Fundamental tax reforms towards a system with either "allowance for corporate equity" (ACE) or a "comprehensive business income tax" (CBIT) should also eliminate any thin-capitalization incentive.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Altshuler R. and Mintz J.M. 1995. U.S. Interest-Allocation Rules: Effects and Policy. International Tax and Public Finance 2 7-35.

  • Bach S. and Buslei H. 2009. Empirische Analysen zur Zinsschranke auf Grundlage von Handelsbilanzdaten. DIW Research Notes 30 Berlin.

  • Bach S. 2009. Stellungnahme des DIW Berlin zum Gesetzentwurf Bürgerentlastungsgesetz Krankenversicherung BT-Drucksache 16/12254 und BR-Drucksache 168/09. DIW Berlin.

  • Blaufus K. and Lorenz D. 2009. Wem droht die Zinsschranke? Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Identifikation der Einflussfaktoren. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 79 503-526.

  • Blouin J. Huizinga H. Laeven L. and Nicodeme G. 2014. Thin Capitalization Rules and Multinational Firm Capital Structure. CentER Discussion Paper No. 2014-007.

  • Boadway R. and Bruce N. 1984. A General Proposition on the Design of a Neutral Business Tax. Journal of Public Economics 11 93-105.

  • Broer M. 2009. Ziele Wirkungsweise und Steueraufkommen der neuen Zinsschranke. Schmollers Jahrbuch 129 391-413.

  • Büttner T. Overesch M. Schreiber U. and Wamser G. 2009. Taxation and Capital Structure Choice - Evidence from a Panel of German Multinationals. Economics Letters 105 309-311.

  • Büttner T. Overesch M. Schreiber U. and Wamser G. 2012. The Impact of Thin-capitalization Rules on the Capital Structure of Multinational Firms. Journal of Public Economics 96 930-938.

  • Büttner T. Overesch M. and Wamser G. 2014. Anti Profit-Shifting Rules and Foreign Direct Investment CESifo Working Paper No. 4710 Munich.

  • Buslei H. and Simmler M. 2012. The Impact of Introducing an Interest Barrier - Evidence from the German Corporation Tax Reform 2008. DIW Discussion Papers 1215 Berlin.

  • Deloitte 2014. Guide to Controlled Foreign Company Regimes. Accessed online at http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-guide-to-cfc-regimes-210214.pdfonNovember13th2014.

  • De Mooij R.A. 2011. Tax Biases to Debt Finance: Assessing the Problem Finding Solutions. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/11/11 Washington DC.

  • De Mooij R.A. and Devereux M. 2011. An Applied Analysis of ACE and CBIT Reforms in the EU. International Tax and Public Finance 18 93-120.

  • Det Kongelige Finansdepartement 2013a. Prop. 1 LS (2013-2014): Skatter Avgifter og Toll 2014. Proposisjon til Stortinget (forslag til lovvedtak og stortingsvedtak) for budsjettåret 2014 Oslo.

  • Det Kongelige Finansdepartement 2013b. Prop. 1 LS Tilleg 1 (2013-2014): Skatter Avgifter og Toll 2014. Oslo.

  • Desai M.A. Foley C.F. and Hines J.R. 2004. A Multinational Perspective on Capital Structure Choice and Internal CapitalMarkets. Journal of Finance 59 2451-2487.

  • Dourado A. and de la Feria R. 2008. Thin Capitalization Rules in the Context of the CCCTB. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper 08/04.

  • Dreßler D. and Scheuering U. 2012. Empirical Evaluation of Interest Barrier Effects. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 12-046.

  • Egger P. and Wamser G. 2011. The Impact of Controlled Foreign Company Legislation on Real Investments Abroad: A two-dimensional Regression Discontinuity Design. CEPR Working Paper No. 8460 London.

  • Ernst& Young 2014. Worldwide Corporate Tax Guide 2014. EYGMLimited.

  • Federal Public Service FINANCE 2012. Notional Interest Deduction: An Innovative Belgian Tax Incentive. Ministry of Finance Brussels.

  • Förster G. and Schmidtmann D. 2004. CFC Legislation in Germany. Intertax 32 476-486.

  • Folkvord B. and Jacobsen M.R. 2014. Corporate Income Tax and the International Challenge. Nordic Tax Journal 2014:2 55-87.

  • Froot K.A. and Hines jr. J.R. 1995. Interest Allocation Rules Financing Patterns and the Operations of U.S. Multinationals. In: Feldstein M. Hines jr. J.R. and Hubbard R.G. (eds) The Effects of Taxation on Multinational Corporations. University of Chicago Press 277-312.

  • Gouthière B. 2005. A Comparative Study of the Thin Capitalization Rules in the Member States of the European Union and Certain Other Countries. European Taxation 45 367-451.

  • Haufler A. and Runkel M. 2012. Firms’ Financial Choices and Thin- Capitalization Rules under Corporate Tax Competition. European Economic Review 56 1087-1103.

  • Herzig N. Lochmann U. and Liekenbrock B. 2008. Die Zinsschranke im Lichte einer Unternehmensbefragung Unternehmensbefragung. Der Betrieb 61 593-602.

  • Hong Q. and Smart M. 2010. In Praise of Tax Havens: International Tax Planning and Foreign Direct Investment. European Economic Review 54 82-95.

  • Huizinga H. Laeven L. and Nicodème G. 2008. Capital Structure and International Debt-shifting. Journal of Financial Economics 88 80-118.

  • Institute for Fiscal Studies 1991. Equity for Companies. A Corporation Tax for the 1990s. London.

  • Knipe P.J. Stryker J.P. and Thorne B. 2009. Earnings Stripping Under Section 163(j): Status Quo Vadis? International Business: Research Teaching and Practice 3 90-104.

  • Lodin S.O. 2014. An Overview of the Proposal of the Swedish Government Committee on Corporate Taxation. Nordic Tax Journal 2014:2 43-54.

  • Mintz J. and Smart M. 2004. Income Shifting Investment and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence from Provincial Taxation in Canada. Journal of Public Economics 88 1149-1168.

  • Mintz J.M. and Weichenrieder A.J. 2010. The Indirect Side of Direct Investment - Multinational Company Finance and Taxation. MIT Press Cambridge.

  • Mirrlees J.A. Adam S. Besley T.J. Blundell R. Bond S. Chote R. Gammie M. Johnson P. Myles G.D. and Poterba J.M. 2011. Tax by Design: The Mirrlees Review. Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Møen J. Schindler D. Schjelderup G. and Tropina J. 2011. International Debt Shifting: Do Multinationals Shift Internal or External Debt? Department of Economics Working Paper 2011-40 University of Konstanz.

  • NOU2014:13 2014. Kapitalbeskatning i en internasjonal økonomi. Norges offentlige utredninger Oslo.

  • OECD 2013. Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. OECD Publishing Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264202719-en

  • Overesch M. and Wamser G. 2010. Corporate Tax Planning and Thin Capitalization Rules: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment. Applied Economics 42 562-573.

  • Overesch M. and Wamser G. 2014. Bilateral Internal Debt Financing and Tax Planning ofMultinational Firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 42 191-209.

  • Panteghini P. Parisi M.L. and Pighetti F. 2012. Italy’s ACE Tax and Its Effect on a Firm’s Leverage. CESifo Working Paper Nr. 3869 Munich.

  • Penttilä S. and Nieminen M. 2013. Finland - Interest Deduction Limitation Rules Introduced. European Taxation May 2013 237-242.

  • Princen S. 2012. Taxes Do Affect Corporate Financing Decisions: The Case of Belgian ACE. CESifo Working Paper No. 3713 Munich.

  • Regeringen 2014. Summaries of the Proposal from the Swedish Committee on Corporate Taxation. http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/24/22/09/23b369ae.pdf

  • Ruf M. and Weichenrieder A.J. 2012. The Taxation of Passive Foreign Investments: Lessons from German Experience. Canadian Journal of Economics 45 1504-1528.

  • Schindler D. and Schjelderup G. 2012. Debt Shifting and Ownership Structure. European Economic Review 56 635-647.

  • Schindler D. and Schjelderup G. 2013. Transfer Pricing and Debt Shifting in Multinationals. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4381 Munich.

  • SOU2014:40 2014. Neutral Bolagsskatt - För Ökad Effektivitet och Stabilitet. Slutbetänkande av Företagsskattekommittén. Statens offentliga utredingar Stockholm.

  • Statistisches Bundesamt 2011. Fachserie 14 Reihe 4 - Finanzen und Steuern - Steuerhaushalt. Wiesbaden.

  • Sylt C. and Reid C. 2011. Formula Money. Formula One’s Financial Performance Guide. CNC - Communication and Network Consulting Wyndeham Grange Southwick West Sussex.

  • US Department of Treasury 1992. Integration of the Individual and Corporate Tax Systems: Taxing Business Income Once. US Government Printing Oflce Washington.

  • Wamser G. 2014. The Impact of Thin-Capitalization Rules on External Debt Usage - A Propensity Score Matching Approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 76 764-781.

  • Weichenrieder A.J. and Windischbauer H. 2008. Thin-Capitalization Rules and Company Responses: Experience from German Legislation. CESifo Working Paper Nr. 2456 Munich.

Search
Journal information
Target audience: academics, researchers, practitioners, administrators, judges and policy makers interested in the taxation systems in the Nordic region
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1093 553 20
PDF Downloads 385 226 10