Exploring Smokers’ Opposition to Proposed Tobacco Control Strategies

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND – Tobacco control (TC) advocates are searching for new TC strategies to decrease smoking rates further.

AIMS – The aim of this study is to explore smokers’ opposition to 16 TC strategies, including the attitudes in the sample as a whole. The results are discussed in relation to the importance of public versus smoker support, and the need for legitimate TC strategies.

METHODS – An Internet panel with 35,000 registered users was accessed to invite participants to join a survey on attitudes towards TC strategies. In addition, 1253 participants were recruited directly from mobile phone lists. Of the 5543 participants recruited, 5250 adults aged 20 years or older were eligible for analysis. Respondents’ attitudes were measured on a five-point Likert scale, and mean values, standard deviations and percentages of those who opposed TC regulations were reported.

RESULTS – In the total sample, there was some support for regulating smoking in specific outdoors areas. Smokers opposed all of the proposed strategies except banning smoking in cars carrying children, increasing the age limit for purchasing cigarettes and banning smoking at transportation stops. Smokers seemed to accept regulations that protected others from the health risks of smoking, but defended their right to smoke in some specific outdoor areas.

CONCLUSIONS – Smokers opposed most of the proposed TC strategies. Smokers’ support may be more important in TC areas that aim to denormalise smoking and where enforcement is more complex.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) (2016). Smoking in cars. Fact sheet. Retrieved from http://ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_714.pdf

  • Ashley M. J. Cohen J. Bull S. Ferrence R. Poland B. Pederson L. & Gao J. (2000). Knowledge about tobacco and attitudes toward tobacco control: How different are smokers and nonsmokers? Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Sante Publique 91(5) 376-380. Retrieved from http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11089293

  • Bayer R. (2008). Stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we. Social Science & Medicine 67(3) 463–472. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.017

  • Bayer R. & Bachynski K. (2013). Banning smoking in parks and on beaches: Science policy and the politics of denormalization. Health Affairs 32(7) 1291–1298. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1022

  • Bell K. Mc Cullough L. Salmon A. & Bell J. (2010). “Every space is claimed”: Smokers’ experiences of tobacco denormalization. Sociology of Health & Illness 23(6) 914–929. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01251.x

  • Bergsvik D. (2015). Avgiftsfritt salg av alkohol og tobakk ved norske lufthavner. SIRUS-rapport 6/2015 (in Norwegian). Retrieved from https://www.fhi.no/publ/2015/avgiftsfritt-salg-av-alkohol-og-tobakk-vednorske-lufthavner2/

  • Bloch M. & Shopland D. R. (2000). Outdoor smoking bans: More than meets the eye. Tobacco Control 9(1) 99. doi:10.1136/tc.9.1.99

  • Bosnjak M. Haas I. Galesic M. Kaczmirek L. Bandilla W. & Couper M. P. (2013). Sample composition discrepancies in different stages of a probability-based online panel. Field Methods 1–22. doi:10.1177/1525822X12472951

  • Burris S. (2008). Stigma ethics and policy: A commentary on Bayer’s “Stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we”. Social Science & Medicine 67(3) 473–475. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.020

  • Canadian Cancer Society (2014). Laws banning smoking in vehicles carrying children: International overview. Retrieved from http://www.ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_909.pdf

  • Chapman S. (2000). Banning smoking outdoors is seldom ethically justifiable. Tobacco Control 9(1) 95–97. doi:10.1136/tc.9.1.95

  • Collins D. & Procter A. (2011). Smoking’s shrinking geographies. Geography Compass 5(12) 918–931.

  • Diepeveen S. Ling T. Suhrcke M. Roland M. & Marteau T. M. (2013). Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health 13(1) 1–11. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-756

  • Dillman D. A. Phelps G. Tortora R. Swift K. Kohrell J. Berck J. & Messer B. L. (2009). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail telephone interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research 38(1) 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007

  • Dixon R. D. Lowery R. C. Levy D. E. & Ferraro K. F. (1991). Self-interest and public opinion toward smoking policies: A replication and extension. Public Opinion Quarterly 55(2) 241–254. doi:10.1086/269255

  • Evans J. & Chen Y. (2009). The association between home and vehicle environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and chronic bronchitis in a Canadian population: The Canadian Community Health Survey 2005. Inhalation Toxicology 21(3) 244–249. doi:10.1080/08958370802409567

  • Fong G. Hammond D. Laux F. Zanna M. Cummings K. Borland R. & Ross H. (2004). The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 6(Suppl 3) S341–351.

  • Francis T. (2012). Plain cigarette packaging begins in Australia. The Lancet 380 1896.

  • Gallus S. Lugo A. Fernandez E. Gilmore A. B. Leon M. E. Clancy L. & La Vecchia C. (2014). Support for a tobacco endgame strategy in 18 European countries. Preventive Medicine 67 255–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.001

  • Green D. E. & Gerken A. E. (1989). Self-interest and public opinion towards smoking restrictions and cigarette taxes. Public Opinion Quarterly 53(1) 1–16. doi:10.1086/269138

  • Hersch J. (2005). Smoking restrictions as a self-control mechanism. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 31(1) 5–21. doi:10.1007/s11166-005-2927-2

  • Hitchman S. C. Fong G. T. Zanna M. P. Hyland A. & Bansal-Travers M. (2011). Support and correlates of support for banning smoking in cars with children: Findings from the ITC Four Country Survey. The European Journal of Public Health 21(3) 360–365. Retrieved from http://eurpub.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/3/360.abstract

  • Johns M. Coady M. H. Chan C. A. Farley S. M. & Kansagra S. M. (2013). Evaluating New York City’s smoke-free parks and beaches law: A critical multiplist approach to assessing behavioral impact. American Journal of Community Psychology 51 254–263. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9519-5

  • Kaufman P. Griffin K. Cohen J. Perkins N. & Ferrence R. (2010). Smoking in urban outdoor public places: Behaviour experiences and implications for public health. Health and Place 16(5) 961–968. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.05.012

  • Lazuras L. Rodafinos A. Panagiotakos D. Thyrian J. John U. & Polychronopoulos E. (2009). Support for smoke-free policies in a pro-smoking culture: Findings from the European survey on tobacco control attitudes and knowledge. International Journal of Public Health 54(6) 403–408. doi:10.1007/s00038-009-0074-2

  • Levy D. T. Chaloupka F. & Gitchell J. (2004). The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: A tobacco control scorecard. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 10(4) 338–353. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/jphmp/Fulltext/2004/07000/The_Effects_of_Tobacco_Control_Policies_on_Smoking.11.aspx

  • Lund K. E. (2006). The introduction of smoke-free hospitality venues in Norway. Impact on revenues frequency of patronage satisfaction and compliance. SIRUS skrifter 2/2006. Retrieved from https://www.fhi.no/publ/eldre/the-introduction-of-smoke-free-hospitality-venues-in-norway/

  • Lund M. Lund K. E. & Halkjelsvik T. (2014). Contrasting smokers’ and snus users’ perception of personal tobacco behavior in Norway. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 16(12) 1577–1585.

  • Lund M. (2015). Social inequality in cigarette consumption cigarette dependence and intention to quit among Norwegian smokers. BioMed Research International Special Issue on Tobacco Disparities 2015 1–7.

  • Lykke M. Pisinger C. & Glümer C. (2016). Ready for a goodbye to tobacco? Assessment of support for endgame strategies of smoking among adults in a Danish regional health survey. Preventive Medicine 83 5–10. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.016

  • Martinez C. Guydish J. Robinson G. Martínez-Sánchez J. M. & Fernández E. (2014). Assessment of the smoke-free outdoor regulation in the WHO European Region. Preventive Medicine 64 37–40. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.03.020

  • McCool J. Webb L. Cameron L. D. & Hoek J. (2012). Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: Will they make a difference to adolescents? Social Science & Medicine 74(8) 1269–1273.

  • Mikalsen K.-E. (2015 April 15). Flyplasser på legges ned hvis taxfree forsvinner [in Norwegian]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://www.aftenposten.no/okonomi/Flyplasser-ma-legges-ned-hvis-taxfreeforsvinner-7980871.html

  • Ministry of Health and Care Services. (2014). A tobacco-free future. National strategy for tobacco control 2013–2016. Oslo.

  • Ministry of Health and Care Services (2012). Proposition to the Storting (bill) Prop.55 L. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/enklere-tilsynsordning-medtobakk/id2468567/

  • Ministry of Health and Care Services (2015). Consultation paper. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/standardisertetobakkspakninger-og-gjennomforing-avtobakkskonvensjonen-artikkel-5.3-i-norge/id2401022/

  • Moodie C. Angusa K. Stead M. & Bauld L. A. (2012). Plain tobacco packaging: A systematic review. Report prepared for the Department of Health. Stirling Scotland: Centre for Tobacco Control Research University of Stirling.

  • Morain S. & Mello M. M. (2013). Survey finds public support for legal interventions directed at health behavior to fight noncommunicable disease. Health Affairs 32(3) 486–496. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0609

  • Nagelhout G. E. Levy D. T. Blackman K. Currie L. Clancy L. & Willemsen M. C. (2012). The effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. Findings from the Netherlands SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Model. Addiction 107(2) 407–416. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03642.x

  • Nesje S. B. (2000). Bevillingssystem for salg av tobakk? Tidsskrift for Norsk Lægeforening 120 976.

  • News.com.au. (2012). Philip Morris loses Norway tobacco bid. Retrieved from http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/philip-morris-loses-norway-tobacco-bid/story-e6frfkui-1226474623905

  • Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (2015). Rusmidler i Norge 2015 [in Norwegian]. Retrieved from https://www.fhi.no/publ/2015/rusmidler-inorge-2015/

  • Poland B. D. (2000). The “considerate” smoker in public space: The micro-politics and political economy of “doing the right thing”. Health Place 6(1) 1–14.

  • Poland B. Cohen J. E. Ashley M. J. Adlaf E. Ferrence R. Pederson L. L. Bull S. B. & Raphael D. (2000). Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Tobacco Control 9(4) 364–371.

  • Rabe B. (2013). Political impediments to a tobacco endgame. Tobacco Control 22 52–54. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050799

  • Rees V. W. & Connolly G. N. (2006). Measuring air quality to protect children from secondhand smoke in cars. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 31(5) 363–368. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.021

  • Shabab L. & West R. (2010). Public support in England for a total ban on the sale of tobacco products. Tobacco Control 19 143–147. doi:10.1136/tc.2009.033415

  • Smith C. N. Kraemer J. D. Johnson A. C. & Mays D. (2015). Plain packaging of cigarettes: Do we have sufficient evidence? Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 8 21–30. Doi:10.2147/RMHP.S63042

  • Sureda X. Fernández Muñoz E. López M. J. & Nebot M. (2013). Secondhand tobacco smoke exposure in open and semi-open settings: A systematic review. Environmental Health Perspectives121(7) 766–773. doi:10.1289/ehp.1205806

  • Talati A. Keyes K. M. & Hasin D. S. (2016). Changing relationships between smoking and psychiatric disorders across twentieth century birth cohorts: Clinical and research implications. Molecular Psychiatry January 2016 1–8. doi:10.1038/mp.2015.224

  • Thomas B. P. & Gostin L. O. (2013). Tobacco endgame strategies: Challenges ethics and law. Tobacco Control 22 i55–i57. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050839

  • Vollset S. E. Selmer R. & Magnus P. (2011). Hvor dødelig er røyking? (Mortality from smoking). Updated report. Retrieved from http://www.fhi.no/dokumenter/45d7c26ad4.pdf accessed May 21 2016.

  • Warner K. E. (2013). An endgame for tobacco? Tobacco Control 22(Suppl 1) i3–i4. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-050989

  • Wong G. Pawson R. & Owen L. (2011). Policy guidance on threats to legislative interventions in public health: A realist synthesis. BMC Public Health 11 222. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-222

  • Zhang X. Cowling D. W. & Tang H. (2010). The impact of social norm change strategies on smokers’ quitting behaviours. Tobacco Control 19(Suppl 1) i51–i55. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.029447

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.683
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.752


CiteScore 2018: 0.64

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.313
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.456



Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 109 56 2
PDF Downloads 57 30 1