Cost-of-alcohol studies as a research programme

Open access

Cost-of-alcohol studies as a research programme

AIMS - According to the literature, estimates of the costs of alcohol abuse serve four main purposes: They draw attention to the severity of alcohol problems, they help to target specific problems and policies, they identify information gaps and they provide a baseline for future cost-effectiveness studies. This paper evaluates to which extent these purposes have been met in recent studies and how likely they can be met in the future. METHOD - Critical review. MATERIAL - Thirty reports on alcohol costs published after 2000. CONCLUSIONS - Even the most sophisticated cost-of-alcohol calculations include entries based on misleading assumptions or logical mistakes. Monetary calculations do not add precision to the comparison of the weight of health problems. Cost calculations cannot be used to compare the extent or nature of alcohol problems in different countries. Cost calculations should focus on money spent from clearly defined budgets. Calculating the costs to "society" is not a promising research program. It is good to measure the joys and sorrows of heavy drinkers and their nearest, but the use of a monetary metric conceals important issues and value judgments. As a research program, the cost-of-alcohol tradition is based on promises about future cost-effectiveness studies, but traditional measures of alcohol problems offer a better picture of the effects of policy measures than cost-of-alcohol estimates.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anderson P. & Chisholm D. & Fuhr D. C. (2009): Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. The Lancet 373: 2234-2246

  • Baumberg B. (2006): The global economic burden of alcohol: A review and some suggestions. Drug and Alcohol Review 25 (6): 537-551

  • Bekmuradov D. & Rehm J. & Stade B. & Popova S. (2010): Limitations of existing studies estimating cost of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. 36th Annual Epidemiology Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society May 30-June 4 Lausanne

  • Brook U. & Feigin R. & Sherer D. & Geva D. (2001): Prevalence attitudes and knowledge of high school pupils towards drugs and other addictions: Implications for school health education in Israel. Patient Education and Counseling 43 (2): 199-209

  • Burd L. & Selfridge R. H. & Klug M. G. & Juelson T. (2003): Fetal alcohol syndrome in the Canadian corrections system. Journal of FAS International 1: e14

  • Chisholm D. & Rehm J. & Van Ommeren M. & Monteiro M. (2004): Reducing the global burden of hazardous alcohol use: A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 65: 782-93

  • Collins D. J. & Lapsley H. M. (2008): The costs of tobacco alcohol and illicit drug abuse to Australian society in 2004/05. National Drug Strategy Monograph No. 64. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia [Ref. 11.09.2011. Online:$File/mono64.pdf]$File/mono64.pdf

  • Collins D. & Lapsley H. & Brochu S. & Easton B. & Pérez-Gómez A. & Rehm J. & Single E. (2006): International guidelines for the estimation of the avoidable costs of substance abuse. Ottawa: Health Canada [Ref. 11.09.2011. Online:]

  • Crampton E. & Burgess M. & Taylor B. (2011): The cost of cost studies. Paper presented at the New Zealand Economics Association 2011 Meetings Wellington [Ref. 11.09.2011. Online:]

  • Dodgson J. & Bramley-Harker E. & Spackman M. & Aslam S. & Barham L. (2003): Alcohol in London: A cost-benefit analysis - a final report for the Greater London Authority. London: National Economic Research Associates (NERA) [Ref. 21.11.2011. Online:]

  • Fekjaer H. O. (2011): Changing paradigms in the alcohol field. 37th Annual Alcohol Epidemiology Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society 11-15 April 2011 Melbourne

  • Flood Chris. (2010): Should ‘standard gamble’ and ‘time trade off’ utility measurement be used more in mental health research? The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 13 (2): 65-72

  • Giesbrecht N. & Cukier S. & Steeves D. (2010): Collateral damage from alcohol: implications of ‘second-hand effects of drinking’ for populations and health priorities. Addiction 105: 1323-1325

  • Haasen C. & Verthein U. & Eiroa-Orosa F. J. & Schäfer I. & Reimer J. (2010): Is heroin-assisted treatment effective for patients with no previous maintenance treatment? Results from a German randomised controlled trial. European Addiction Research 16: 124-130

  • Horverak Ø. (2010): Alcohol and economics: Research politics or industry? Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 27 (4): 305-325

  • Hou Shu-Ying & Ke Chiao-Li Khale & Su Yi-Ching & Lung For-Wey & Huang Chun-Jen (2008): Exploring the burden of the primary family caregivers of schizophrenia patients in Taiwan. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 62 (5): 508-514

  • Jarl J. (2010): Cost-of-illness studies on substance use - both under- and overestimated. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 27 (4): 339-345

  • Johansson P. & Jarl J. & Eriksson A. & Eriksson M. & Gerdtham U-G. & Hemström Ö. & Hradilova Selin K. & Lenke L. & Ramstedt M. & Room R. (2006): The social costs of alcohol in Sweden 2002. Stockholm: SoRAD

  • Kraemer K. L. & Roberts M. S. & Horton N. J. & Palfai T. & Samet J. & Freedner N. & Tibbetts N. & Saitz R. (2005): Health utility ratings for a spectrum of alcohol-related health states. Medical Care 43 (6): 541-50

  • Laslett A-M. & Catalano P. & Chikritzhs Y. & Dale C. & Doran C. & Ferris J. & Jainullabudeen T. & Livingston M. & Matthews S. & Mugavin J. & Room R. & Schlotterlein M. & Wilkinson C. (2010): The range and magnitude of alcohol's harm to others. Fitzroy Victoria: AER Centre for Alcohol Policy Research Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre Eastern Health [Ref. 11.09.2011. Online:]

  • Lenton S. & Boys A. & Norcross K. (1997): Raves drugs and experience: drug use by a sample of people who attend raves in Western Australia. Addiction 92 (10): 1327-1337

  • Mäkelä K. & Mustonen H. (1996): The reward structure of drinking among younger and older male drinkers. Contemporary Drug Problems 23 (3): 479-492

  • Mäkelä K. & Simpura J. (1985): Experiences related to drinking as a function of annual alcohol intake and by sex and age. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 15: 389-404

  • Markandya A. & Pearce D. W. (1989): The social costs of tobacco smoking. British Journal of Addiction 84 (10): 1139-1150

  • McVeigh T. (2012): On Cardiff's party streets they'll put up with dearer drinks - by saving on the taxi home. The Observer [Ref. 25.03.2012. Online:

  • Melberg H. O. (2010): Conceptual problems with studies of the social cost of alcohol and drug use. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 27 (4): 287-303

  • Melberg H. O. & Hakkarainen P. & Houborg E. & Jääskeläinen M. & Skretting A. & Ramstedt M. & Rosenqvist P. (2011): Measuring the harm of illicit drug use for friends and family. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 28 (2): 105-121

  • Miller T. R. (2004): The social costs of adolescent problem behavior. In Biglan A. & Brennan P. A. & Foster S. L. & Holder H. D. (eds.): Helping adolescents at risk: Prevention of multiple problem behaviors. New York: Guilford Press

  • Miller T. R. & Levy D. T. & Spicer R. S. & Taylor D. M. (2006): Societal costs of underage drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 67 (4): 519-528

  • Mohapatra S. & Patra J. & Popova S. & Duhig A. & Rehm J. (2010): Social cost of heavy drinking and alcohol dependence in high-income countries. International Journal of Public Health 55: 149-157

  • Mustonen H. & Mäkelä K. (1999): Relationships between characteristics of drinking occasions and negative and positive experiences related to drinking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 56 (1):79-84

  • Møller L. & Matic S. (eds.) (2010): Best practice in estimating the costs of alcohol: Recommendations for future studies. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization [Ref. 25.10.2011. Online:]

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2010): Measuring effectiveness and cost effectiveness: the QALY. [Ref. 27.02.2012. Online:

  • Osterberg E. (2010): What to do to and with cost calculations? Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 27 (4): 347-352

  • Oviedo-Joekes E. & March J. C. & Romero M. & Perea-Milla E. (2010): The Andalusian trial on heroin-assisted treatment: A 2 year follow-up. Drug and Alcohol Review 29 (1): 75-80

  • Pezzullo L. & Cutler H. (2010): Review of ‘The range and magnitude of alcohol's harm to others’. Canberra: Access Economics [11.09.2011. Online:]

  • Popova S. & Stade B. & Rehm J. (2010): Methodology for estimating the economic impact of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. 36th Annual Epidemiology Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society May 30-June 4 Lausanne

  • Productivity Commission (1999): Australia's gambling industries. Volume 1: Report (Parts A-C). Canberra: AusInfo [Ref. 21.12.2012. Online:

  • Purshouse R. & Brennan A. & Latimer N. & Meng Y. & Rafia R. & Jackson R. & Meier P. (2009): Modelling to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of public health related strategies and interventions to reduce alcohol attributable harm in England using the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model version 2.0: Report to the NICE Public Health Programme Development Group [Ref. 25.12.2011. Online:

  • Reuter P. (1999): Are calculations of the economic costs of drug abuse either possible or useful? Addiction 94 (5): 635-638

  • Room R. (1991): Cultural changes in drinking and trends in alcohol problems indicators: Recent U. S. experience. In Walter B. C. & Michael E. H. (eds.): Alcohol in America: Drinking practices and problems. Albany: State University of New York Press

  • Room R. & Greenfield T. K. & Weisner C. (1991): People who might have liked you to drink less: Changing responses to drinking by U. S. family members and friends 1979-1990. Contemporary Drug Problems 18: 573-595

  • Rosen S. M. & Miller T. R. & Simon M. (2008): The cost of alcohol in California. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 32 (11): 1925-1936

  • Rossow I. & Hauge R. (2004): Who pays for the drinking? Characteristics of the extent and distribution of social harms from others' drinking. Addiction 99 (9): 1094-1102

  • Schäfer I. & Eiroa-Orosa F. J. & Verthein U. et al. (2010): Effects of psychiatric comorbidity on treatment outcome in patients undergoing diamorphine or methadone maintenance treatment. Psychopathology 43: 88-95

  • Single E. & Collins D. & Easton B. & Harwood H. & Lapsley H. & Kopp P. & Wilson E. (2003): International guidelines for estimating the costs of substance abuse. Second edition. Geneva: World Health Organization

  • Skog O-J. (2005): Choice social interaction and addiction: the social roots of addictive preferences. In Lindgren B. & Grossman M (eds.): Substance use: Individual behaviour social interactions markets and politics. Amsterdam: Elsevier

  • Slack A. & Nana G. & Webster M. & Stokes F. & Wu J. (2009): Costs of harmful alcohol and other drug use. Wellington: Business and Economic Research Limited [Ref 07.03.2011. Online:]

  • Snellman H. (2011): Haastattelututkimuksiin liittyvät eettiset kysymykset ja eettinen ennakkoarviointi (Ethical issues related to interview surveys and ethical review). Conference organized by the National Advisory Board on Research Ethics in Finland May 17 [Ref. 18.02.2012. Online:]

  • Stade B. & Ungar W. J. & Stevens B. & Beyenne J. & Koren G. (2006): The burden of prenatal exposure to alcohol: measurement of cost. Journal of FAS International 4: 1-14

  • Stringham E. P. (2009): The catastrophe of what passes for alcohol policy analysis. Reason Foundation Policy Brief No. 78 [Ref. 11.09.2011. Online:]

  • The Lancet (2012): Public health in England: From nudge to nag. The Lancet 379: 194

  • Wagenaar A. C. & Salois M. J. & Komro K. A. (2009): Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: A meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction 104 (2): 179-190

  • Walker D. M. & Barnett A. H. (1999): The social costs of gambling: An economic perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies 15 (3): 181-212

  • Walker D. M. & Kelly S. M. (2011): The roots of modern social cost of gambling estimates. Economic Affairs 31 (1): 38-42

  • WHO (2009): WHO guide to identifying the economic consequences of disease and injury. Geneva: WHO [Ref. 21.11.2011. Online:

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.683
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.752

CiteScore 2018: 0.64

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.313
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.456

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 78 41 2
PDF Downloads 52 28 0