The effects of missing data when surveying alcohol habits

Open access

The effects of missing data when surveying alcohol habits

AIMS - This study aimed at describing the effects of missing data when surveying alcohol consumption using a Random Digit Dialling procedure. METHODS - Data was part of the Monitor project including repeated monthly data on the alcohol habits in the general Swedish population. Non-respondents during four months were followed up a year later and asked to do a shortened telephone interview and were compared to a concurrent sample of respondents (n=2552 versus n=6005). Further, using a second approach, the monthly levels of non-response was related to the level of measured alcohol use in a time series analysis (n=67500). RESULTS - The results indicated no differences in the level of reported alcohol or tobacco use with except for a slightly higher proportion of alcohol abstainers in the sample of initial non-response. The time series showed no pattern of co-variation between the obtained nonresponse levels and the assessed levels of alcohol or tobacco use. CONCLUSIONS - On the basis of the results it was meaningful to make a distinction between "soft" non-respondents (responding after extensive contacting effort) and "hard" non-respondents (not responding albeit extensive effort) and the results suggest that inclusion of the "soft" non-respondents does not by necessity lead to higher levels of assessed alcohol use.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Barchielli A. & Balzi D. (2002): Nine-year follow-up of a survey on smoking habits in Florence (Italy): higher mortality among non-responders. International Journal of Epidemiology 31: 1038-1042

  • Bergman H. & Källmen H. (2002): Alcohol use among Swedes and a psychometric evaluation of the alcohol use disorders identification test. Alcohol & Alcoholism 37: 245-251

  • Box G. E. P. & Jenkins G. M. (1976): Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. London: Holden-Day

  • de Graaf R. & Bijl R. V. & Smit F. & Ravelli A. & Vollebergh W. A. M. (2000): Psychiatric and sociodemographic predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence study (NEMESIS). American Journal of Epidemiology 152: 1039-1047

  • Galesic M. & Tourangeau R. & Couper M. P. (2006): Complementing random digit dialling telephone surveys with other approaches to collecting sensitive data. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 31: 437-443

  • Hill A. & Roberts J. & Ewing P. & Gunnell D. (1997): Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey. Journal of Public Health Medicine 19: 203-207

  • Källmén H. & Wennberg P. & Berman A. H. & Bergman H. (2007): Alcohol habits in Sweden during 1997-2005 as measured with the AUDIT. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 61: 466-470

  • Källmen H. & Wennberg P. & Berman A. & Leifman H. & Bergman H. (2010): Alcohol habits in Sweden during 1997-2009 with particular focus on 2005 and 2009 assessed with the AUDIT submitted manuscript

  • Lapham S. & Baum G. & Skipper B. & Chang I. (2000): Attrition in a follow-up study of driving while impaired offenders: who is lost? Alcohol & Alcoholism 35: 464-470

  • Midanik L. T. & Greenfield T. K. & Rogers J. D. (2001): Reports of alcohol-related harm: Telephone versus face-to-face interviews. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 62: 74-78

  • Morrisson T. C. & Wahlgren D. R. & Hovell M. F. & Zakarian J. & Burkham-Kreitner S. & Hofstetter R. & Slymen D. J. & Keating K. & Russos S. & Jones J. A. (1997): Tracking and follow-up of 16915 adolescents: Minimizing attrition bias. Controlled Clinical Trials 18: 383-396

  • Pope D. & Croft P. (1996): Surveys using general practice registers: who are the non-responders? Journal of Public Health Medicine 18: 6-12

  • Ramstedt M. (2010): How much alcohol do you buy? A comparison of self-reported alcohol purchases with actual sales. Addiction 105: 649-654

  • Thygesen L. C. & Johansen C. & Keiding N. & Giovannucci E. & Gronbaek M. (2008): Effects of sample attrition in a longitudinal study of the association between alcohol intake and all-cause mortality. Addiction 103: 1149-1159

  • von Eye A. (2001): Configural frequency analysis - Methods models and applications. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

  • von Eye A. & Spiel C. & Wood P. K. (1996): CFA models tests interpretation and alternatives: A rejoinder. Applied Psychology: An International Review 45: 345-352.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.683
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.752

CiteScore 2018: 0.64

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.313
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.456

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 64 34 0
PDF Downloads 42 23 0