Crowning Moments

Transformative populist use of the media and the case of Carl I. Hagen

Open access

Abstract

This article presents the concept of a “crowning moment” and proposes an explanation for the media-savviness of many populist leaders – an under-theorised ability often referred to in existing research. A crowning moment is an instance in which populist leaders take advantage of opportunities that arise in their surroundings to achieve a or multiple major policy, political and/or personal goals through skilful use of the media that earns them recognition as savvy politicians. The concept is exemplified through an analysis of Norwegian Progress Party leader Carl I. Hagen’s role in the 1987 no-confidence motion against the Labour Party government. Stoking up and exploiting media interest in dramatic fashion, Hagen managed to redefine himself as a national political leader and made his party appear responsible.

Asp, K. (1986). Mäktiga massmedier: Studier i politisk opinionsbildning [Powerful mass media: Studies in political opinion-building]. Stockholm: Akademilitteratur.

Boczkowski, P. & Papacharissi, Z. (2018). Trump and the media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Blumenthal, S. (1982). The permanent campaign. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Blumler, J. & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3): 209-230.

Bratholm, E. (2008). NRK forhandlet ikke med Hagen [The NBC did not negotiate with Hagen]. [online]. Retrieved from <https://journalisten.no/story/52813>. [Accessed 2018, November 12].

Britannica. (2018). Count Herman Wedel-Jarlsberg. [online]. Retrieved from <https://www.britannica.com/biography/Johan-Caspar-Herman-Landgreve-Wedel-Jarlsberg>. [Accessed 2018, October 25].

Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1): 2-16.

Capoccia, G. (2016). Critical junctures. In O. Fioretos, T. Falleti & A. Sheingate (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism (pp. 89-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collier, D. & Mahon, J. (1993). Conceptual stretching revisited – Adapting categories in comparative-analysis. American Political Science Review, 87(4): 845-855.

Edwards, G. (2012). Overreach: Leadership in the Obama presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Erlandsen, H. C. (1987). Dype klassiske skilleliner [Deep traditional cleavages]. Aftenposten, 13 June, 1987.

Esser, F., Stępińska, A. & Hopmann, D. N. (2017). Populism and the media: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stömback, & C. de Vreese (eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 1-13). London: Routledge.

Farrell, D. (2006). Political parties in a changing campaign environment. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 122-133). London: SAGE Publications.

Freeden, M. (1998). Is nationalism a distinct ideology? Political Studies, 46(4): 748-765.

Gidron, N. & Bonikowski, B. (2013). Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda. Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA.,: Harvard.

Giugni, M. (2009). Political opportunities: From Tilly to Tilly. Swiss Political Science Review, 15(2): 361-367.

Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hagen, C. I. (1979). Ingen moske i Oslo [No mosque in Oslo]. Aftenposten, 28. November, 1979.

Hagen, C. I. (2007). Ærlig talt: memoarer 1944-2007 [Honestly speaking: Memoirs 1944-2007]. Oslo: Cappelen.

Harmel, R., Svåsand, L. & Mjelde, H. (2018). Institutionalization (and de-institutionalization) of rightwing protest parties: The progress parties of Denmark and Norway. Colchester: ECPR Press.

Heinisch, R. (2003). Success in opposition – failure in government: Explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office. West European Politics, 26(3): 91-130.

Herbst, S. (2003). Political authority in a mediated age. Theory and Society, 32(4): 481-503.

Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society. Nordicom Review, 29(2): 105-134.

Iversen, J. M. (1998). Fra Anders Lange til Carl. I Hagen: 25 år med Fremskrittspartiet [From Anders Lange to Carl. I Hagen: 25 years with the Progress Party]. Oslo: Millennium.

Jagers, J. & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3): 319-345.

Johansen, A. (2002). Talerens troverdighet [The credibility of the speaker]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Jungar, A-C. & Jupskås, A. (2014). Populist radical right parties in the Nordic egion: A new and distinct party family? Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(3): 27-56.

Jupskås, A. (2015). Persistence of populism the Norwegian Progress Party, 1973-2009. Oslo: University of Oslo.

Kjeldsen, J. (2002). Den norske demagogen. Frykten for Carl I. Hagens retorikk [The Norwegian demagogue. The fear of Carl I. Hagen’s rhetoric]. In M. Eide (ed.), Skråblikk. Medievitenskapelige formidlingsfrukter [ideomatic/untranslatable] (pp. 137-156). Bergen: Institutt for medievitenskap.

Lundby, K. (2009). Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences. New York: Peter Lang Inc.

Malmø, M. (1987). Til Berlevåg og Bulgaria [To Berlevåg and Bulgaria]. Aftenposten, 13. June, 1987.

Manucci, L. (2017). Populism and the media. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 467-488). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Populism and the media. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (eds.), Twenty-first century populism. The spectre of Western European democracy (pp. 49-64). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mazzoleni, G. (2014). Mediatization and political populism. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck, (eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies (pp. 42-56). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Moen, E. S.(2006). Profet i eget land [Profet in one’s own country]. Oslo: Gyldendal.

Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist: Government and Opposition, 39 (4): 541-563.

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pedersen, M. (1982). Towards a new typology of party lifespans and minor parties. Scandinavian Political Studies, 5(1): 1-16.

Rommetvedt, H. (2014). Hagen styrte ARK, men hvem styrte Hagen? [Hagen steered the ARK, but who steered Hagen?], Dagbladet, 6 May, 2014 [online]. Retrieved from <https://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/hagen-styrte-ark-men-hvem-styrte-hagen/60208556>. [Accessed 2018, November 12].

Sandnes, S. & Tørdal, R. (2018). Monopoloppløsning på 1980-tallet [Dissolution of the monopoly in the 1980s]. [online]. Retrieved from <https://ndla.no/nb/node/76666?fag=52222>. [Accessed 2018, October, 23].

Sartori, G.(1970). Concept misinformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4):1033-1053.

Semetko, H. (2006). Parties in the media age. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 515-527). London: SAGE Publications.

Storsletten, K. (1987). TV-Hagen slår til [TV-Hagen strikes]. VG, 12 June, 1987.

Strömbäck, J. & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies (pp. 3-28). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Svåsand, L. (2002). The Norwegian Progress Party: A populist party? Paper presented at the conference Contemporary Populisms in Historical Perspective, 7-10 January 2003, at Liguria Center, Bogliasco, Genoa.

Thomas, D. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2): 237-246.

Todal, P. (2003). Sosialistisk Venstreparti: Kunsten å vere seg sjølv [The Socialist Left Party: The art of being oneself ]. Dag og Tid, 3 May, 2003.

Wiesendahl, E. (2009). Die Mitgliederparteien zwischen Unmodernität und wieder endecktem Nutzen [Membership parties between outdatedness and rediscovered usefulness]. In U. Jun, O. Niedermayer & E. Wiesendahl (eds.), Zukunft der Mitgliederpartei [The future of the membership party] (pp. 31-52). Opladen & Farmington Hills, MI: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

Zaslove, A. (2008). Here to stay? Populism as a new party type. European Review, 16(3): 319-336.

Nordicom Review

Journal from the Nordic Information Centre for Media and Communication Research (Nordicom)

Journal Information


CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.223
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.270


Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 112 112 24
PDF Downloads 60 60 8