In this study we investigate the abilities to determine the credibility of digital news among 483 teenagers. Using an online survey with a performance test we assess to what extent teenagers are able to determine the credibility of different sources, evaluate credible and biased uses of evidence, and corroborate information. Many respondents fail to identify the credibility of false, biased and vetted news. Respondents who value the importance of credible news seem to hold a mindset helping them to determine credibility better than other respondents. In contrast, respondents self-reporting to be good at searching information online and who find information online trustworthy are not very good at civic online reasoning. Our findings, which may be linked to theories of disciplinary literacy, science curiosity and overconfidence, provide a basis for further research of how to better understand and support civic online reasoning in classrooms and society.
Basu, S. & Savani, K. (2017). Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139: 76-91.
Carlsson, U. (2018). Medie-och informationskunnighet (MIK) i den digitala tidsåldern: En demokratifråga- Kartläggning, analys, reflektioner [Media information competence (MIK) in the digital age: A question of democracy - survey, analysis, and reflection]. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
Davidsson, P. & Thoresson, A. (2017). Svenskarna och internet 2017: Undersökning om svenskarnas internetvanor [The Swedes and Internet 2017: Survey on Swedes’ Internet habits. IIS, Internetstiftelsen i Sverige.
Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., . . . Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 113(3): 554-559. doi:
Dunning, D., Heath, D. & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3): 69-106.
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J. & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own competence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3): 83-87.
Ekström, M., Olsson, T. & Shehata, A. (2014). Spaces for public orientation? Longitudinal effects of Internet use in adolescence. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2): 168-183.
Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D. & Kruger, J. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 105(1): 98-121.
EU (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union, 30(12).
Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2008). Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, 5-27. doi:
Francke, H., Sundin, O. & Limberg, L. (2011). Debating credibility: The shaping of information literacies in upper secondary school. Journal of Documentation, 67(4): 675-694.
Guo, L., Trueblood, J. S. & Diederich, A. (2017). Thinking fast increases framing effects in risky decision making. Psychological Science, 28(4): 530-543.
Hargittai, E. (2001). Second-level digital divide: Mapping differences in people’s online skills. arXiv preprintcs/0109068
Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na (t) ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1): 92-113.
Hatlevik, O. E. & Christophersen, K.-A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63: 240-247. doi:
Hatlevik, O. E., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B. & Loi, M. (2015). Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self-efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence. Computers & Education, 81: 345-353. doi:
Kirschner, P. A. & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3): 169-183.
Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6): 1121.
Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. (2002). Unskilled and unaware − but why? A reply to Krueger and Mueller. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 189-192
Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., . . . Rothschild, D. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380): 1094-1096.
Lee, N.-J., Shah, D. V. & McLeod, J. M. (2013). Processes of political socialization: A communication mediation approach to youth civic engagement. Communication Research, 40(5): 669-697.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N. & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3): 106-131.
Lindell, J. & Hovden, J. F. (2018). Distinctions in the media welfare state: Audience fragmentation in postegalitarian Sweden. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5): 639-655.
Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1): 3-14. doi:
McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M. & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2): 165-193.
McGrew, S., Ortega, T., Breakstone, J. & Wineburg, S. (2017). The challenge that’s bigger than fake news: Civic reasoning in a social media environment. American Educator, 41(3): 4.
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J. & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3): 413-439.
Min, S-J. (2010). From the digital divide to the democratic divide: Internet skills, political interest, and the second-level digital divide in political Internet use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1): 22-35. doi:
Nygren, T. (2014). Students writing history using traditional and digital archives. Human IT: Journal for Information Technology Studies as a Human Science, 12(3): 78-116.
Nygren, T. (2018). Digital källkritik i nyhetsflöden och undervisning [Digital sourcing in news feeds and teaching]. Paper presented at the Conference Medie-och informationskunnighet (MIK) i den digitala tidsåldern.
Nygren, T., Brounéus, F. & Svensson, G. (2019). Diversity and credibility in young people’s news feeds: A foundation for teaching and learning citizenship in a digital era. Journal of Social Science Education, forthcoming.
Nygren, T., Haglund, J., Samuelsson, C. R., Af Geijerstam, Å. & Prytz, J. (2018). Critical thinking in national tests across four subjects in Swedish compulsory school. Education Inquiry, 1-20. doi:
Nygren, T. & Johnsrud, B. (2018). What would Martin Luther King Jr. say? Teaching the historical and practical past to promote human rights in education. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 10(2): 287-306.
Nygren, T. & Vikström, L. (2013). Treading old paths in new ways: Upper secondary students using a digital tool of the professional historian. Education Sciences, 3(1): 50-73.
OECD (2015). Assessing progression in creative and critical thinking skills in education.
Pachur, T., Hertwig, R. & Wolkewitz, R. (2014). The affect gap in risky choice: Affect-rich outcomes attenuate attention to probability information. Decision, 1(1): 64.
Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T. & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4): 393-429. doi:
Silverman, C. (2015). Lies, damn lies and viral content: How news websites spread (and debunk) online rumors, unverified claims, and misinformation. Tow Center for Digital Journalism, 168
SiRiS, National Statistics from Swedish National Agency for Education, https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik/sok-statistik-om-forskola-skola-och-vuxenutbildning
Skolverket (2016). IT-användning och IT-kompetens i skolan. Skolverkets IT-uppföljning 2015 [IT use and IT skills in the school. The Swedish National Agency for Education’s IT follow up 2015]. Dnr: 2015:00067. Stockholm: Skolverket. Retrieved from https://www.skolverket.se/sitevision/proxy/publikationer/svid12_5dfee44715d35a5cdfa2899/55935574/wtpub/ws/skolbok/wpubext/trycksak/Blob/pdf3617.pdf?k=3617. [accessed 2019, January 12].
Skolverket. (2017). Få syn på digitaliseringen på gymnasial nivå/grundskolenivå [Perceiving digitalisation at a secondary/primary school level]. Wolters Kluwers.
Strömbäck, J., Djerf-Pierre, M. & Shehata, A. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4): 414-435.
UNESCO (2011). Media and information literacy: Curriculum for teachers. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000192971. [accessed 2019, January 9].
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A. & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72: 577-588.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380): 1146-1151.
Wardle, C. & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe report, DGI 2017, 9.
Wineburg, S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3): 495-519.
Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3): 319-346.
Wineburg, S. & McGrew, S. (2017, October 6). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Stanford history education group working paper no. 2017-A1. Retrieved from doi: