Digital Equality and the Uptake of Digital Applications among Seniors of Different Age

Open access


Ageing societies are facing challenges from the perspective of the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs). There is an increase in online services relevant for the economic, political, cultural and private life. Those who participate more fully in a digitally mediated social life enjoy advantages over their digitally disadvantaged counterparts. Today’s digital divide is not first and foremost between pensioners and others, but between younger and older pensioners. Scholars identify the need for longitudinal research among younger and older seniors to understand the differences between more or less advantaged users. Based on longitudinal, representative surveys, the present study finds that there is a clear gap between younger and older seniors, and that it is closing only very slowly. Age and level of education are powerful explanatory factors whereas generational belonging and social capital contribute only to a limited extent to the understanding of Internet uptake among older adults.


  • Boulton-Lewis, Gillian M.; Buys, Laurie; Lovie-Kitchin, Jan; Barnett, Karen & Davis, L. Nikki (2007). Aging, Learning, and Computer Technology in Australia. Educational Gerontology, 33(3): 253-270.

  • Bouwman, Harry & Van Der Duin, Patrick (2007). Futures Research, Communication and the Use of Information and Communication Technology in Households in 2010: A Reassessment. New Media & Society, 9(3): 379-399.

  • Brügger, Niels (2013). Web Histography and Internet Studies: Challenges and Perspectives. New Media & Society, 15(5): 752-764.

  • Carpenter, Brian D. & Buday, Sarah (2007). Computer Use among Older Adults in a Naturally Occurring Retirement Community. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6): 3012-3024.

  • Davis, Fred (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319-340.

  • Davis, Richard (2005). Politics Online: Blogs, Chatrooms and Discussion Groups in American Democracy. New York and London: Routledge.

  • Dickinson, Anna; Arnott, John & Prior, Suzanne (2007). Methods for Human-Computer Interaction Research with Older People. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(4): 343-352.

  • Dickinson, Anna & Gregor, Peter (2006). Computer Use has no Demonstrated Impact on the Well-Being of Older Adults. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8): 744-753.

  • Docampo Rama, Mili; de Ridder, Huib & Bouma, Herman (2001). Technology Generation and Age in Using Layered User Interfaces., 1(1): 25-40.

  • Fisch, Martin & Christoph Gscheidle (2008). Mitmachnetz Web 2.0: Rege Beteiligung nur in Communitys. Media Perspektiven, 7: 356-364.

  • Friemel, Thomas N. (2016). The Digital Divide has Grown Old: Determinants of a Digital Divide among Seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2): 313-331.

  • Gatto, Susan L & Tak, Sunghee H. (2008). Computer, Internet, and E-mail Use among Older Adults: Benefits and Barriers. Education Gerontology, 34(9): 800-811.

  • Gersch, Beate (1998). Gender at the Crossroads: The Internet as a Cultural Text. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 22(3): 306-321.

  • Haddon, Leslie (2000). Social Exclusion and Information and Communication Technologies: Lessons from Studies of Single Parents and the Young Elderly. New Media & Society, 2(4): 387-406.

  • Haddon, Leslie (2006). The Contribution of Domestication Research to In-Home Computing and Media Consumption. The Information Society: An International Journal, 22(4): 195-203.

  • Hargittai, Eszter (2008). Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1): 276-297.

  • Hargittai, Eszter & Gina Malejko (2008). The Participation Divide: Content Creation and Sharing in the Digital Age. Information, Communication & Society, 11(2): 239-256.

  • Helsper, Ellen (2010). Gendered Internet Use across Generations and Life Stages. Communication Research, 37(3): 352-374. Internet World Stats (n.d.) Internet World Stats. URL (accessed 2017-01-11).

  • Lenhart, Amanda; Madden, Mary; Macgill, Alexandra & Aaron Smith (2007). Teens and Social Media. Pew Internet & American Life Project. URL (accessed 2009-11-24).

  • Loos, Eugène (2012). Senior Citizens: Digital Immigrants in their Own Country? Observatorio (OBS), 6(1): 1-23.

  • Mannheim, Karl (1952). The problem with generations, pp. 276-320 in Kecskemeti, Paul (ed.) Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Meikle, Graham & Young, Sherman (2012). Media Convergence. Networked digital media in everyday life. Basingstoke, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Obi, Toshio; Ishmatova, Diana & Iwasaki, Naoko (2013). Promoting ICT Innovations for the Ageing Population in Japan. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82: e47-e62.

  • Rains, Stephen A. (2008). Health at High Speed. Broadband Internet Access, Health Communication, and theDigital Divide. Communication Research, 35(3): 283-297.

  • Reisenwitz, Tim; Iyer, Rajesh; Kuhlmeier, David B. & Eastman, Jacqueline K. (2007). The Elderly’s Internet Usage: an Updated Look. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(7): 406-418.

  • Robinson, Laura; Cotton, Shelia R; Ono, Hiroshe; Quan-Haase, Anabel; Mesch, Gustavo; Chen, Wenhong; Schulz, Jeremy; Hale, Timothy M. & Stern, Michael J. (2015). Digital Inequalities and Why they Matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5): 569-582.

  • Rogers, Everett M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.

  • Turkle, Sherry (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  • van Deursen, Alexander JAM & Helsper, Ellen J. (2015). A Nuanced Understanding of Internet Use and Nonuse Among Elderly. European Journal of Communication, 30(2): 171-187.

  • van Deursen, Alexander & van Dijk, Jan (2011). Internet Skills and the Digital Divide. New Media & Society, 13(6): 893-911.

  • van Deursen, Alexander & van Dijk, Jan (2014). The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage. New Media & Society, 16(3): 507-526.

  • Venkatesh, Viswanath; Thong, James Y. L. & Xu, Xin (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1): 157-178.

  • Verkasalo, Hannu; López-Nicolás, Carolina; Molina-Castillo, Francisco H. & Bouwman, Harry (2010). Analysis of Users and Non-users of Smartphone Applications. Telematics and Informatics, 27(3): 242-255.

  • Vernersdotter, Frida (2016). Den nationella SOM-undersökningen 2015, pp. 433-459 [The National SOM Survey 2015] in Ohlsson, Jonas; Oscarsson, Henrik & Solevid, Maria (eds.) Ekvilibrium [Equilibrium]. Gothenburg: The SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg.

  • Victor, Christina; Westerhof, Gerben J. & Bond, John (2007). Researching Ageing, pp. 85-112 in Bond, John; Peace, Sheila; Dittmann-Kohli, Freya & Westerhof, Gerben (eds.) Ageing in Society. London, Thousand Oaks CA, New Delhi and Singapore: Sage Publications Ltd. Third edition.

  • Winston, Brian (1998). Media Technology and Society. A History: From the Telegraph to the Internet. London and New York: Routledge.

Nordicom Review

The Journal of University of Gothenburg, Nordicom

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.393
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.678


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 52 52 30
PDF Downloads 9 9 4