Humans’ perceived relationship to nature and non-human lifeforms is fundamental for sustainable development; different framings of nature – as commodity, as threat, as sacred etc. – imply different responses to future challenges. The body of research on nature representations in various symbolic contexts is growing, but the ways in which nature is framed by people in the everyday has received scant attention. This paper aims to contribute to our understanding of the framing of nature by studying how wild-boar hunting is depicted on YouTube. The qualitative frame analysis identified three interrelated frames depicting hunting as battle, as consumption, and as privilege, all of which constitute and are constituted by the underlying notion of human as superior to nature. It is suggested that these hegemonic nature frames suppress more constructive ways of framing the human-nature relationship, but also that the identification of such potential counter-hegemonic frames enables their discursive manifestation.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Bordwell David & Thompson Kristin (2012). Film art: An introduction. London: McGraw-Hill.
Boykoff Maxwell T. & Boykoff Jules M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of U.S. mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38: 1190-1204.
Buell Lawrence (2005). The future of environmental criticism: Environmental crisis and literary imagination. Malden MA: Blackwell Publications.
Burgess Jean E. & Green Joshua B. (2009). The entrepreneurial vlogger: Participatory culture beyond the professional-amateur divide pp. 89-107 in Snickars Pelle & Vonderau Patrick (eds.) The YouTube reader. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden.
Carbaugh Donal & Cerulli Tovar (2013). Cultural discourses of dwelling: Investigating environmental communication as a place-based practice. Environmental Communication 7(1): 4-23.
Cardoso Gustavo (2012). Networked life world: Four dimensions of the cultures of networked belonging. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal Special Issue: 197-205.
Carragee Kevin M. & Roefs Wim (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication 54(2): 214-233.
Cassidy Angela & Mills Brett (2012). “Fox tots attack shock”: Urban foxes mass media and boundary-breaching. Environmental Communication 6(4): 494-511.
Castells M. (2005). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy society and culture. London: Wiley.
Champ Joseph G.; Williams Daniel R. & Lundy Catherine M. (2013). An on-line narrative of Colorado wilderness: Self-in-“cybernetic space”. Environmental Communication 7(1): 131-145.
Cox Robert (2007). Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: Does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environmental Communication 1(1): 5-20.
Corbett Julia B. (2006). Communicating nature. How we create and understand environmental messages. Washington: Island Press.
DeLuca Kevin M. (1999). Image politics: The new rhetoric of environmental activism. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
DeLuca Kevin M. & Slawter-Volkening Lisa (2009). Memories of the Tropics in industrial jungles: Constructing nature contesting nature. Environmental Communication 3(1): 1-24.
Dixon Wheeler W. (2003). Visions of the apocalypse: Spectacles of destruction in American cinema. London: Wallflower Press.
Entman Robert M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43: 52-58.
Esaiasson Peter; Gilljam Mikael; Oscarsson Henrik & Wängnerud Lena (2012). Metodpraktikan: Konsten att studera samhälle individ och marknad [Handbook of methods: The art of studying society individuals and markets]. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
Flyvberg Bent (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219-245.
Gamson William A. (1988). Political discourse and collective action pp. 219-244 in Klandermans Bert; Kriesi Hanspeter & Tarrow Sidney G. (eds.) International social movement research. Greenwich: JAI Press
Gamson William A. & Modigliani Andre (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action pp. 137-177 in Braungart Richard D. (ed.) Research in political sociology: A research annual. Greenwich: JAI Press.
Ganetz Hillevi (2004). Familiar beasts: Nature culture and gender in wildlife films on television. Nordicom Review 25(1-2): 197–214.