High Stakes

An Interview Study of Researchers’ Motivations for and Experiences of being Interviewed by Journalists

Research Professor Benedicte Carlsen 1  and PhD, Associate Professor Hanne Riese 2
  • 1 Uni Research Rokkan Centre, Bergen
  • 2 Department of Education, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen


Researchers are key sources of an increasing amount of research news in the media. Hitherto, the meagre empirical literature on researchers’ media performances has been divided in two strands: one indicating that researchers are generally motivated to report their research in the media, and the other paradoxically reporting negative experiences of and conflict with journalists. The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian researchers’ motivations for participating in and experiences of journalistic interviews. We find that researchers’ main reason for seeking media coverage is that they want their findings to be of use to society. This makes it essential to avoid errors or misleading framing of the news report. Despite strong motivations to do so, the researchers experience that communicating through the media is stressful and that their motivations for seeking media attention are in conflict with the motives of some research journalists. The study reveals a link between researchers´ motivation for seeking media coverage and their experiences of conflict with journalists.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Barnett, Steven (2002) Will a crisis in journalism provoke a crisis in democracy? The Political Quarterly, 73(4), 400-408.

  • Bell, Allan (1994) Media (mis) communication on the science of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 3(3), 259-275.

  • Besley, John C., & Nisbet, Matthew (2011) How scientists view the public, the media and the political process. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6), 644-659.

  • Blach-Ørsten, Mark, & Burkal, Rasmus (2014) Credibility and the media as a political institution. Nordicom Review. Special issue.

  • Brumfiel, Geoff (2009) Science journalism: Supplanting the old media? Nature News, 458(7236), 274-277.

  • Carlsen, Benedicte, & Glenton, Claire (2011) What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 26.

  • Carlsen, Benedicte, Müftüoglu, Ingrid Birce, & Riese, Hanne (2014) Forskning i media-Forskere om motivasjon og erfaringer fra medieintervjuer. Norsk Medietidsskrift(03), 188-208.

  • Castell, Sarah, Charlton, Anne, Clemence, Michael, Pettigrew, Nick, Pope, Sarah, Quigley, Anna, Shah, Jayesh Navin & Silman, Tim (2014) Public Attitudes to Science 2014. London: Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute.

  • Connelly, F. Michael, & Clandinin, D. Jean (1990) Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational researcher, 19(5), 2-14.

  • Eide, Martin, & Ottosen, Rune (1994) `Science journalism’ without science journalists: notes on a Norwegian media paradox. Public Understanding of Science, 3(4), 425-434.

  • Göpfert, Winfried (2007) The strength of PR and the weakness of science journalism. Journalism, Science and Society, 215.

  • Kalleberg, Ragnvald (2012) Sociologists as Public Intellectuals and Experts. Journal of Applied Social Science, 6(1), 43-52.

  • Kovach, Bill, & Rosenstiel, Tom (2007) The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press (CA).

  • Kvale, Steinar (1996) Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

  • Løvhaug, Johannes W. (2011) Overlæreren i rampelyset. Universitetet i mediesamfunnet 1970-2011 (The head teacher in the limelight. The University in the media society 1970-2011). In John Peter Collet (Ed.) Universitetet i Oslo 1811-2011 (Vol. 7, pp. 367-509). Oslo: Unipub.

  • Miles, Matthew, & Huberman, Michael. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.

  • Patton, Michael Quinn (2005) Qualitative Research Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • Peters, Hans Peter (1995) The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society, 17(1), 31-48.

  • Peters, Hans Peter, Brossard, Dominique, de Cheveigné, Suzanne, Dunwoody, Sharon, Kallfass, Monika, Miller, Steve, & Tsuchida, Shoji (2008) Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider. Science Communication, 30(2), 266-276.

  • Reed, Rosslyn (2001) (Un-)Professional discourse?: Journalists’ and scientists’ stories about science in the media. Journalism, 2(3), 279-298.

  • Schäfer, Mike S. (2012) Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 650-663.

  • Silverman, David (1985) Qualitative methodology and sociology: describing the social world. Gower Publishing Ltd.

  • Smith, Katherine Clegg, Singer, Rachel Friedman, & Kromm, Elisabeth Edsall (2010) Getting Cancer Research Into the News: A Communication Case Study Centered on One U.S. Comprehensive Cancer Center. Science Communication, 32(2), 202-231.

  • Wilson, Kris M. (1995) Mass media as sources of global warming knowledge. Mass Comm Review, 22, 75-89.


Journal + Issues