Patterns of Media Use and Reflections on Media among young Danes

Open access


The present article examines cross-media use among 10- to 16-year-old Danish children and adolescents. Our research interest is in identifying and affirming patterns among media use, gender and age. Using a methodological design that combines qualitative and quantitative methods, we interviewed participants regarding their media use and paired our qualitative findings with quantitative rating inquiries generated from Danish commercial databases. Our results suggest that although cross-media use is complex and differs according to age and gender, media are often used for similar purposes, e.g., sustaining social relationships.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anderson Chris (2009/2006). The long tail. How endless choice is creating unlimited demand. London: Random House Business Books.

  • Awan Fatima & Gauntlett David (2013a). ‘Remote Living: Exploring online (and offline) experiences of young people living in rural areas’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 16: 3-23.

  • Awan Fatima & Gauntlett David (2013b). ‘Young people’s uses and understandings of online social networks in their everyday lives’. Young 21: 111-132.

  • Bragg Sara & Buckingham David (2008). ‘’Scrapbooks’ as a resource in media research with young people.’ In Thomson P. Doing visual research with children and young people. London: Routledge.

  • Buckingham David (2013). ‘Teaching the creative class? Media education and the media industries in the age of ‘participatory culture’’. Journal of Media Practice 14(1): 25-41.

  • Buckingham David & Martínez-Rodriguez Juan Bautista (2013). ‘Interactive youth: New citizenship between social networks and school settings’. Comunicar 20(40): 10-13.

  • Buckingham David (2009). ‘Creative visual methods in media research: possibilities problems and Proposals’. Media Culture & Society 31(4): 633-652.

  • Buckingham David (2008). (edt.) Youth identity and digital media. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

  • Buckingham David (2005). The Media Literacy of Children and Young People. A review of the research literature on behalf of Ofcom. London: Centre for the Study of Children.

  • Butler Judith (1990). Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

  • Butler Judith (1993). Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.

  • Carlsson Ulla (ed.) (2010). Children and Youth in the Digital Media Culture. From a Nordic Horizon. Göteborg: Nordicom The International Clearinghouse on Children Youth and Media.

  • Carlsson Ulla (ed.) (2012). Barn och ungas medieanvändning I nätverkssamhället. Göteborg: Nordicom.

  • Couldry Nick (2004). ‘Theorising media as practice’. Social Semiotics 14 (2): 115-132.

  • Couldry Nick & Hepp Andreas (2013). ‘Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts Traditions Arguments’. Communication Theory. 23(3) : 191-202.

  • Douglas Mary (1996). Thought Styles: Critical Essays on Good Taste. London: Sage

  • Drotner Kirsten (1991). At skabe sig – selv: Ungdom æstetik pædagogik. København: Gyldendal.

  • Drotner Kirsten (2000). ‘Bred mediebrug bedre kompetencer? Om forholdet mellem medieanvendelse og kompetencer hos de 15-18-årige’. MedieKultur. Journal of media and communication research 16: 36-43.

  • Drotner Kirsten (2008). Leisure Is Hard Work: Digital Practices and Future Competencies. Youth Identity and Digital Media. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

  • Drotner Kirsten (2010). Democratic Digital Literacies. Three Obstacles in Search of a Solution. International Clearinghouse on Children Youth and Media. Yearbook.

  • Endestad Tor Heim Jan Kaare Birgit Torgersen Leila & Brandtzæg Petter Bae (2011). ‘Media user types among young children and social displacement’. Nordicom Review 32 (1): 17-30.

  • Erstad Ola (2010). Paths Towards Digital Competencies: Naïve Participation or Civic Engagement? International Clearinghouse on Children Youth and Media. Yearbook.

  • Gauntlett David (2011). Making is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity From DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Gauntlett David (2005). Moving Experiences: Media effects and beyond. Australia Eastleigh: John Libbey & Co.

  • Goffman Erving (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

  • Grunert Klaus G. Brock Steen Brunsø Karen Christiansen Tenna Edelenbos Merete Kastberg Hanne Krogager Stinne Gunder Strøm Mielby Line Holler & Povlsen Karen Klitgaard (2015). ‘Cool snacks: A cross-disciplinary approach to healthier snacks for adolescents’. Trends in Food Science and Technology.

  • Halkier B. (2002). Fokusgrupper (Focus Groups). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.

  • Hartmann Maren (2010). ‘Media Literacy/Competence Participation and Youth. Conceptual Reflections 2.0.’ in Olsson Tobias & Dahlgren Peter (ed.) Young People ICTs and Democracy. Göteborg: Nordicom.

  • Hartmann Maren (2013). ‘From domestication to mediated mobilism’. Mobile Media & Communication 1: 42-49.

  • Jensen Klaus Bruhn (2013). ‘Definitive and Sensitizing Conceptualizations of Mediatization’. Communication Theory. 23(3): 203-222.

  • Krogager Stinne Gunder Strøm (2012). Når piger og drenge burger medier og mad: en metodeeksperimenterende mediebrugsanalyse i 4. og 9. klasse. (When girls and boys use media and food. An experimental study of media use in 4th and 9th grade.) Department of aesthetics and communication University of Aarhus Denmark. (Dr.diss.)

  • Krogager Stinne Gunder Strøm Grunert Klaus G. Brunsø Karen Povlsen Karen Klitgaard Brock Steen Christiansen Tenna Edelenbos Merete Kastberg Hanne Mielby Line Holler& (2015). ‘Cool snacks: A cross-disciplinary approach to healthier snacks for adolescents’. Trends in Food Science and Technology (in review).

  • Krogager Stinne Gunder Strøm & Povlsen Karen Klitgaard (2010). ‘Eksperimenterende gruppeinterviews med børn om mad medier og lyst’ in Bjørner T. (ed) Den oplevede virkelighed: 11 eksempler på kvalitativ metode i praksis. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

  • Kvale Steinar (2002). Interview: en introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. København: Hans Reitzel.

  • McRobbie Angela (1991). Feminism and Youth Culture: from ”Jackie to ”Just seventeen”. London: Macmillan.

  • Morgan David L. (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

  • Prensky Marc (2001). ‘Digital Natives Digital Immigrants’. On the Horizon 9(5): 1-6.

  • Reckwitz Andreas (2002). ‘Toward a Theory of Social Practices’. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243.

  • Schatzki Theodore R. (1996). Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sonck Nathalie Livingstone Sonia Kuiper Els & Jos de Haan J. (2011). Digital Literacy and Safety Skills. EU Kids Online. London School of Economics & Political Science London UK.

  • Stald Gitte (2004). ‘Billeder af børns og unges mediebrug’. Dansk pædagogisk tidsskrift. 2004(1): 36-59.

  • Sundin Ebba (2013). ‘The complex Process of Children’s Identity in New Landscapes of Media and Culture’. Communication Management Quarterly. 29: 17-36.

  • Sørensen Birgitte Holm (2000). ‘Nye medier – en udfordring for børnemedieforskningen’. MedieKultur. 31: 89-99.

  • Thomson Pat (2008). Doing visual research with children and young people. London: Routledge.

  • Tingstad Vebjørg (2006). Barndom under lupen: å vokse opp i en foranderlig mediekultur. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.

  • Tufte Birgitte (2003). ‘Girls in the new media landscape’. Nordicom Review. 24(1): 71-78.

  • Warde Alan (2005). ‘Consumption and theories of practice’. Journal of Consumer Culture. 5(2): 131-153.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.223
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.270

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 448 323 7
PDF Downloads 224 181 17