A Hidden Theory in Financial Crisis Journalism?

Open access

Abstract

The present article analyses press coverage of the dramatic finance crisis and the ensuing European debt crisis in Europe, in three decisive periods. The authors conduct quantitative and qualitative content analyses of two major mainstream Norwegian newspapers, Aftenposten and Dagbladet, employing concepts and methods from framing theory, to analyse coverage in the framework of two contesting schools in economics.

The study finds traces of discussions of finance brokers’ ethics and some discussions of governmental regulations that made the 2008 crisis possible, but few indications of a basic discussion of the system as such. The authors conclude that the crisis was framed more as a superficial, short-term problem (as per a mainstream, neoliberal theory of economics) than as a deeper and long-term system problem (as a more critical ‘political economics’ theory would have held).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Albæk Erik Christiansen Peter M. & Togeby Lise (2003). ‘Experts in the Mass Media: Researchers as Sources in Danish Daily Newspapers 1961-2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 80(4): 937-948.

  • Allern Sigurd & Ihlen Øyvind (2007). “This is the Issue: Framing Contests Public Relations and Media coverage” pp. 233-248 in Strömbäck Jesper Ørsten Mark & Aalberg Toril (eds) Communicating Politics. Göteborg: Nordicom.

  • Berry Mike (2013). “The Today Programme and the Banking Crisis.” Journalism 14 (2): 253-270.

  • Bjerke Paul & Dyb Evelyn (2006). Journalistikk i et risikosamfunn. [Journalism in a Risk Society.] Oslo: Abstrakt.

  • Boyce Tammy (2006). “Journalism and Expertise.” Journalism Studies 7(6): 889-906.

  • Doyle Gillian (2006) “Financial News Journalism. A post-Enron Analysis of Approaches. towards Economic and Financial News Production in the UK”. Journalism 7(4): 433-452

  • Entman Robert (1993). ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51-58

  • Gandy Oscar H. (1982). Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy Norwood: Ablex Publ.

  • Gitlin Todd (1980). The Whole World is Watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Habermas Jürgen (2006). ‘Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research’. Communication Theory 16 (4): 411-426.

  • Iyengar Shanto (1991). Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Kindleberger Charles P. & Aliber Robert Z. (2011). Manias Panics and Crashes. A History of Financial Crises. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Kjær Peter & Slaatta Tore (2007). Mediating Business. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

  • Larsen Peter (2008). Medievitenskap [Media Science]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

  • Lippman Walter (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.

  • Manning Paul (2013). ‘Financial Journalism News Sources and the Banking Crisis’. Journalism 14(2): 173-189.

  • Matthes Jürg (2009). ‘What’s in a Frame?’. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86(2): 349-367.

  • Mårtenson Bo (2003). Den televiserade ekonomin [The Televised Economy]. Dissertation Stockholm University.

  • Nord Lars & Olsson Eva Karin (2012). ‘Good News in Bad Times. A Study of Political Crisis News Journalism in Sweden 2008’. Paper for the IAMCR Conference Durban 15.-20.07.2012.

  • Nord Lars & Strömbäck Jesper (2003) ‘Making Sense of Different Types of Crisis’ Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8(4): 54-75.

  • Olsen Gunhild Ring (2012). ‘Dagbladet’ in Brurås Svein (ed.) Nyhetsvurderinger [News assessments]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.

  • Pan Zhongdang & Kosicsky Gerald. M. (1993) ‘Framing analysis. An approach to news discourse’ Political Communication 10: 55-76.

  • Patton Michael Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

  • Reinert Erik (2009) Spontant kaos [Spontaneous chaos]. Oslo: Res Publica.

  • Starkman Dean (2009) ‘Power problem’ Columbia Journalism Review 48(1): 24.

  • Schifferes Steve and Stephen Coulter (2013) ‘Downloading Disaster: BBC News Online Coverage of the Global Financial Crisis’ Journalism 14(2): 228-252.

  • Schiffrin Anya & Fagan Ryan (2013) ‘Are We All Keynesians Now? The US Press and the American Recovery Act of 2009’ Journalism 14(2): 151-172.

  • Schiffrin Anya (ed.) (2011) Bad News: How America’s Business Press Missed the Story of the Century. New York: New Press.

  • Schudson Michael (1998) ‘Creating Public Knowledge’ pp. 29-34 in Dennis Everett & Snyder Robert (eds.) Media and Democracy. New Brunswick NJ: Transaction.

  • Skarstein Rune (2013) ‘Eurokrisa – tysk hegemoni og økonomisk diktat.” [‘The Euro crisis – German hegemony and economic dictate’] Vardøger 34: 98-123.

  • Slaatta Tore (2003). Den norske medieorden [The Norwegian Media Order]. Oslo: Gyldendal.

  • Strange Susan (1986) Casino Capitalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Thompson Peter (2013) ‘Invested Interests? Reflexivity Representation and Reporting in Financial Markets’ Journalism 14(2): 208-227.

  • Tuchman Gaye (1978) Making News: A Study of the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.

  • Van Gorp Baldwin (2007) ‘The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing the Culture Back” Journal of Communication 57(1): 60-78.

  • Vliegenthart Rens and van Zoonen Liesbet (2011) ‘Power to the Frame: Bringing Sociology back to Frame Analysis’. European Journal of Communication 26 (2): 101-111.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.223
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.270


Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 285 192 2
PDF Downloads 106 84 1