The Mashups of YouTube

Open access


This article focuses on YouTube mashups and how we can understand them as a specific subgenre on YouTube. The Mashups are analysed as audiovisual recontextualizations that are given new meaning, e.g., via collaborative social communities or for individual promotional purposes. This is elaborated on throughout a discussion on Mashups as a mode of everyday bricolages, which are moreover discussed through a theoretical approach to Mashups as exponents of what has been called “Vernacular Creativity”. The article also argues that the novelty of Mashups is not be found in its formal characteristic, but rather in its social and communicative abilities within the YouTube community. This leads to the article’s overall argument that the main characteristic of the YouTube Mashup can be explained in terms of connectivity. It is argued that Mashups reveal a double articulation of connectivity; one that involves the social mechanisms of the Mashups, and another mode, which concerns the explicit embedding of structural connectivity that accentuates the medium-specific infrastructure of YouTube. This double articulation of connectivity is furthermore elaborated on by including Grusin and Bolter’s concept of remediation.

Methodologically, the article draws on empirical observations and examples of Mashups are included to demonstrate the article’s main arguments.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bolter J. & R. Grusin (1999) Remediation Understanding new media. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

  • Bruns A. (2008) Blogs Wikipedia Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

  • Burges J. (2007) Vernacular Creativity and New Media Ph.D. Dissertation Queensland University of Technology Burgess J. and J. Green (2009) YouTube Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Diakopolus N. et al (2007) Remixing Authorship. Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • Grusin R. (2009) YouTube at the End of New Media. In P. Snickars & P. Vonderau (eds.). The YouTube Reader. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden.

  • Hancock H. (2011) Machinima: Limited Ghettoized and Spectacularly Promising. In Journal of VisualCulture 2011 10 (1) 31-37.

  • Harwood T. (2011) Towards a Manifesto for Machinima. In Journal of Visual Culture 2011 10 (1) 6-12.

  • Hawkes T. (2003/1977) Structuralism and Semiotics. London: Routledge.

  • Hebdige D. (1979) Subculture: Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.

  • Jenkins H. (2006) Convergence Culture New York: N.Y. University Press.

  • Katz M. (2010) Capturing Sound. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Keen A. (2007) The Cult of the amateur. New York: Doubleday.

  • Leví-Strauss C. (1966) The Savage Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Manovich L. (2007) What comes after Remix? On Retrieved August 2012: http://remixtheory. net/?p=169

  • Michelson A. (1984) Kino-eye: the writings of Dziga Vertov. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Miller P. et al (2008) Sound unbound Sampling digital music and Culture. Cambridge Massachusetts: the MIT Press.

  • Simonsen T. M. (2011) Categorizing YouTube. In MedieKultur Vol. 28 No. 51 72-93

  • Strangelove M. (2010) Watching YouTube Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Uricchio W. (2009) The Future of a Medium Once Known as Television. In P. Snickars & P. Vonderau (eds.). The YouTube Reader. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.223
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.270

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 257 180 2
PDF Downloads 154 114 3