Rebranding Development Communications in Emergent India

Open access

Abstract

With access to and competence in new ICTs a defining feature of modern citizenship in much of the global South, we need to understand the complex and ambivalent discourse around public-private partnerships, digital inclusion and the very rebranding of development communication in the 21st century. India’s prominence in this area is partially explained by the economic and symbolic success of its export-oriented IT industry. The spectacular nature of economic disparities in the world’s largest democracy - an emerging market vying for global recognition with some of the most severe rural poverty rates worldwide - has meant that private sector actors are increasingly eager to present themselves as active participants in a new discourse of development. In unequal information societies across the global South like India, a critical analysis of corporate actors in the development arena must take into account the wider field of conflict and struggle over the redistribution of public resources evident in the era of liberalization.

Athreye, S. and Chaturvedi, S. (2007) “Industry Associations and technology-based growth in India,” EuropeanJournal of Development Research. Retrieved March 15th, 2009: http://www.ilo.int/public/english/bureau/inst/papers/confrnce/research/sumapaper.pdf

Baviskar, A. (2007) “Is Knowledge Power? The Right to Information Campaign in India,” London: Instituteof Development Studies Working Paper.

Benjamin, S., Bhuvaneshwar, R. and Rajan, R. (2008) “Fractured Terrain, Spaces Left Over or Contested: A Closer Look at the IT-dominated Territories in South and East Bangalore,” in D. Mahadevia (Ed.) Inside Transforming Urban Asia: Processes, Policies and Public Actions. New Delhi: Concept Publishing: 239-285.

Benjamin, S., Bhuvaneshwari, R. and Rajan, P. (2006) ‘E-Titling’ of an ‘Anti-Politics Machine’ to GlobalizeBangalore. International Conference on Enhancing Land Registration Cadastre for Economic Growth in India. New Delhi: Center for Science, Development and Media Studies.

Chakavartty, P. (2007) “Governance Without Politics: Civil Society, Development and the Postcolonial State” International Journal of Communication 1: 1-22.

Chakravartty, P. (2001) “Flexible Citizens and the Internet: The Global Politics of Local High-Tech Development in India,” Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media and Composite Cultures, 11 (1): 69-88.

Chakravartty, P. and Zhao, Y. (eds.) (2008) Political Economy of Global Communication: Towards a TransculturalPerspective. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield Chakravartty, P. and Sarikakis, K. (2006) Globalization, Communication and Media Policy: A Critical Perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

Dangi, N. and Singh, H. (2010) “e-Chopal: Hope or Hype?” American Journal of Economics and BusinessAdministration. 2 (2): 179-184.

De, R. (2008) “Control, De-Polititicization and the eState,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) 5184: 61-74.

Escobar, A. (1994) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ferguson, J. (2006) Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order. Durham: Duke University Press.

Ferguson, J. (1994) The anti-politics machine: development, depoliticization and bureaucratic power inLesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Fuller, C.J. and Narasimhan, H. (2007) “Information Technology Professionals and the New Rich Middle Class in Chennai (Madras)” Modern Asian Studies, 41 (1): 121-150.

Gartsen, C. and Hernes, T. (2009) “Beyond CSR: Dilemmas and Paradoxes of Ethnical Conduct in Transnational Organizations,” in K. E. Browne and B. L. Milgram (eds.) Economics and Morality: AnthropologicalApproaches, Plymoth, UK: AltaMira Press:189-210.

Guha Thakurta, P. and A. Kaushal (2010) “Underbelly of the great Indian Telecom Revolution” Economicand Political Weekly, XLV (49): 59-55.

Gupta, A. (1998) Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India. Durham: Duke University Press.

Gurumurthy, A. (2009) “Social Enterprises to Mobiles: The Curious Case of Propped-Up ICTD Theory” Berkman Cetner for Internet and Society, Harvard. Retrieved January 18th, 2010: http://publius.cc/social_enterprise_mobiles_%E2%80%93_curious_case_propped_ictd_theory/091709

Heeks, R. (2008) “ICT4D2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development,” Computer. 41 (6): 26-33.

Heeks, R. (2002) “Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failures, Successess and Local Improvisations,” The Information Society, 18 (2): 101-112.

Kuriyan, R. and Ray, I. (2009) “E for Express: “Seeing” the Indian State through ICTD” IEEE/ACM Proceedings, Information and Communication Technology and Development, 2009. Retrieved January 15th:2010: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:n3TRzvxP59IJ:tier.cs.berkeley.edu/tierwiki/media/a/a9/ReneeKuriyan_IshaRay_ICTD2009.pdf+E+for+Express:+%E2%80%9CSeeing%E2%80%9D+the+Indian+State+through+ICTD%E2%80%9D&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgeJBc_7XlZFQZ4gelTc7TRvqjwb4G_wZhHWlvItoj9V99_b91VEBnrf26_yPNQOak5xuqjzNmAWFOHElkWJCL1diLGNQ6X2582rjCpXlFdOuwpiw5kNSOeMvjuvSIH5xhb1FXD&sig=AHIEtbSdzuutfSd6lmjCDu2yoYymMY1uMg

Kuriyan, R, Ray, I. and Toyoma, K. (2008) “Information and Communication Technologies for Development: The Bottom of the Pyramid Model in Practice,” Information Society. 24: 1-12.

Mosse, D. (2005) Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy in Practice. New York: Pluto Press.

Microsoft Corporation (July 22, 2008) “Microsoft Strives to Bring Relevant, Affordable and Accessible Technologies to the World’s Rural Underserved Populations,” Retrieved November 14th, 2009: http:// www.gkpeventsonthefuture.org/

Murray Li, T. (2007) The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.

Nilekani, N. (2008) Imagining India: Ideas for the New Century. Delhi: Penguin.

Pieterse, J.N. (2005) “Digital Capitalism and Development: The Unbearable Lightness of ICT4D,” in, G. Lovink and S. Zehle, (eds) Incommunicado Reader. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures: 11-29

Pieterse, N. (2000). ‘Trends in Development Theory’. In R. Palan (ed.) Global Political Economy: ContemporaryTheories. London and New York: Routledge: 197-214

Sarkar, S. “Passionate Producers: Corporate Interventions in Expanding the Promise of the Information Society” International Journal of Communication (Forthcoming) Schwittay, A. (2008) “‘A Living Lab’: Corporate Delivery of ICTs in Rural India” Science, Technology &Society. 13 (2): 175-209.

Sreekumar, TT. (2011) ICTs and Development in India: Perspectives on the Rural Network Society. New York: Anthem Press.

Sreekumar, T.T (2007) “Cyber-Kiosks and the Dilemmas of Social Inclusion in Rural India”, Media, Cultureand Society. 29: 869-887.

Sinha, A. (2005) “Understanding the Rise and Transformation of Business Collective Action in India,” Businessand Politics. 7 (2): 1-35.

Thomas, P. (2009) “Bhoomi, Gyan Ganga, e-governance and the right to information: ICTs and development in India,” Telematics and Informatics. 26 (1): 20-31.

Toyoma, K. et. al. (2004) “Rural Kiosks in India,” ResearchMicrosoft: Retrieved June 9th, 2008: http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=70150

Upadhya, C. (2004) “A New Transnational Capitalist Class? Capital Flows, Business Networks and Entrepreneurs in the Indian Software Industry.” Economic and Political Weekly. November 27th: 5141-5151.

Upadhya, C. and A.R. Vasavi (2008) “Outposts of the Global Information Economy” in C. Upadhya and A.R. Vasavi (eds.) In an Outpost of the Global Economy: Work and Workers in India’s information TechnologyIndustry. New Delhi: Routledge: 9-49.

Utting, P. (2007) “CSR and Equality” Third World Quarterly. 28 (4): 697-712.

Wade, R.H. (2002) “Bridging the digital Divide: New Route to Development or New Form of Dependency?” Global Governance. 8(4): 53-8

Nordicom Review

Journal from the Nordic Information Centre for Media and Communication Research (Nordicom)

Journal Information


CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.223
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.270


Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 191 145 14
PDF Downloads 119 100 8