Substantial improvement in civil society organizations’ [CSOs] management of communication and media endeavors requires a shift from business and marketing models to a development communication perspective. Acting beyond the platform driven model of the current conception of the media manager, the critical communicator will be guided by a rights-oriented, civil society-driven social change vision; critique of the corporatization and marketization of CSOs; lateral, holistic management strategies in facilitating the efforts of the communication - media team; use of multiple media including new media technologies, in particular Web 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0, in order to advance audience-user participation in knowledge production and dissemination [participatory informatics]; and media campaigns that seek to maximize the CSO’s contributions to the advancement of justice, equality, democratization and civic engagement in governance and public policy debates.
Bennett, L. (2008) Civic Life Online. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. (2001) The semantic web. Scientific American. (Retrieved March 26, 2008).
Boris, E. et al. (2011) National Study of Nonprofit-Government Contracting. Washington, D. C.: Center for Nonprofits and Philanthropy, Urban Institute.
Cone & Intangible Business (2011) The Cone Nonprofit Power Brand 100. Boston: Cone.
Dagron, A.G. (2004/2009) Communication for Social Change: The New Communicator. http://kerymedia.com/Alfonso-Gumucio-Dagron/articulos/comunicator.html (Retrieved April 15, 2010).
Dahlgren, P. (2007) Young Citizens and New Media: Learning Democratic Engagement. NY: Routledge.
Eikenberry, A. & Kluver, J.D. (2004) The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? PublicAdministration Review. 64:2, 132-140.
Freire, P. (1970 Pedagogy of the Oppressed. NY: Continuum.
Frumkin, P. (2002) On Being Nonprofit - A Conceptual and Policy Primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fuchs, C., Hofkirchner, W., Schafranek, M., Raffl, C., Sandoval, M. & Bichler, R. (2010) Theoretical Foundations of the Web: Cognition, Communication and Co-operation. Towards an Understanding of Web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0. Future Internet 2010. No. 2, 41-59.
Greenberg, J. & MacAulay, M. (2009) NPO 2.0? Exploring the Web Presence of Environmental Nonprofit Organizations in Canada. Global Media Journal - Canadian Edition. 2:1, 63-88.
Grusin, R. (2011) Premediation and the Virtual Occupation of Wall Street. Theory and Event 2011 Supplement. 14:4. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v014/14.4S.grusin.html (Retrieved December 10, 2011).
Gurstein, R. (2000) Community Informatics: enabling communities with information and communicationstechnologies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Pub.
Gurstein, M. (2003) Effective Use: A community informatics strategy beyond the Digital Divide. First Monday, 8:12. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/ view/1107/1027 (Retrieved December 10, 2011).
Huesca, R. (2003) Participatory approaches to communication for development. In B. Mody (Ed). Internationaland Development Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Melkote, S. (2003) Theories of development communication. In B. Mody (ed.) International and DevelopmentCommunication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Janssen, M. & York, A. (2006) The niche of non-governmental organizations in a changing landscape ofcitizens’ preferences. Unpublished mimeo. http://www.public.asu.edu/~majansse/pubs/janssenyork06.pdf (Retrieved December 10, 2011).
Lemish, P. & Schlote, E. (2009) Media portrayals of youth involvement in social change: The roles of agency, praxis and conflict resolution processes in TV programs. In T. Tufte & F. Enghel (eds). Youth Engagingwith the World - Media, Communication and Social Change, Gothenburg, Sweden: NORDICOM, pp. 193-215.
Mercer, C. (2002) NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress inDevelopment Studies. 2: 1, 5-22.
Miller, E. (2004) The Semantic Web. http://www.w3.org/2004/Talks/0120-semweb-umich/ (Retrieved October 25, 2011).
Moore, D.B. (1995) Development discourse as hegemony: Towards an ideological history - 1945-1995. In D.B. Moore & G.J. Schmitz (eds) Debating Development Discourse: Institutional and Popular Perspectives (pp. 1-53). NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Neff, D. & Moss, R. (2011) The Future of Nonprofits - Innovate and Thrive in the Digital Age. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
O’Reilly, T. (2005) What is Web 2.0 - Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation ofSoftware. http://assets.en.oreilly.com/1/event/28/web2009_websquared-whitepaper.pdf (Retrieved August 28, 2011).
Quebral, N.C. (2001) Development Communication in a borderless world. Paper presented at the national conference-workshop on the undergraduate communication curriculum, “New Dimensions, Bold Decisions”, November 23, 2001, Continuing Education Center, UP Los Baños. Condensed version appeared in Glocal Times, 3, 2006 (http://webzone.k3.mah.se/projects/gt2/viewarticle.aspx?articleID=40&issueID=5; accessed December 10, 2011).
Sawyer, S. & Rosenbaum, H. (2000) Social Informatics in the Information Sciences: Current Activities and Emerging Directions. Informing Science Special Issue on Information Science Research, 3:2, 89-95.
Servaes, J. (2008) Communication for development - approaches of some governmental and non-governmental agencies. Communication for Development & Social Change. LA: Sage.
Smith, M. & Miller, E. (2011) Exhibit 3.0 Part 1 - An Open Source Software Platform for Publishing Linked Data. http://semanticweb.com/exhibit-3-0-part-1-an-open-source-software-platform-for-publishinglinked-data_b22962#more-22962 (Retrieved October 25, 2011).
Treinen, S. (2010) VERCON: The Virtual Extension and Research Communication Network. AgriculturalInformation Worldwide. 3:1, 39-43.
Wilkins, K. g. & Mody, B. (2001) Reshaping development communication: Developing communication and communicating development. Communication Theory. 11:4, 385-396.
Wymer, W. & Mottner, S. (2009) Marketing inclusion in the curricula of U.S. nonprofit management programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 15:2, 185-202.