Introverted Locals or World Citizens?

Open access


Claiming that interest in local vs. foreign news is one way of measuring orientation towards local and greater society, this paper utilizes a Norwegian survey with questions about interest in news to identify groups with different orientations. The study builds on Merton’s (1949) local/cosmopolitan dichotomy, but takes this further by claiming that rather than two, there are four different ways of orienting oneself towards local and greater society on the basis of local/foreign news interest. The author suggests that a categorizing of individuals into either ‘locals’, ‘cosmopolitans’, ‘local cosmopolitans’ or the ‘disconnected’ is a more fruitful way of dealing with this matter. The results show that gender, age, education and ties to one’s domicile may help explain which type of individual constitutes each of the four categories. Comparing traditional media with the Internet, the study shows that the level of interest in news on the Internet is generally lower, but that the patterns tied to the traditional media are transferred relatively unchanged to the Internet.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allern S. (2001) Nyhetsverdier. Om markedsorientering og journalistikk i ti norske aviser. [News values. Market orientation and journalism in ten Norwegian newspapers.] Kristiansand S.: IJ-forlaget.

  • Bilteryst D. (2001) ‘Global News Research and Complex Citizenship. Towards an Agenda for Research on Foreign/International News and Audiences’ in Hjarvard S. (ed.) News in a Globalized Society. Göteborg: Nordicom.

  • Bourdieu Pierre (1993) The Field of Cultural Production. Polity Press: Cambridge.

  • Burke C. (2003) ‘Women Guilt and Home Computers’ in Turow J. & Kavanaugh A. (eds.) The Wired Homestead: An MIT Sourcebook on the Internet and the Family. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • DiMaggio P. (2004) ‘Gender Networks and Cultural Capital’ Preface in Poetics 32: 99-103.

  • Elvestad E. & Blekesaune A. (2008) ‘Newspaper Readers in Europe. A Multilevel Study of Individual and National Differences’ European Journal of Communication 23(4): 425-447.

  • Elvestad E. (2006) ‘Lokal kosmopolitt eller frakoblet? En analyse av stedstilknytning og bruk av lokalaviser’ [Locals cosmopolitans or disconnected? An analysis of community ties and use of local newspapers] Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 47(4): 545-573.

  • Fiske J. (1987) Television Culture: Popular Pleasures and Politics. New York: Methuen.

  • Hagen I. (1997) ‘Communication to an Ideal Audience: News and the Notion of the ‘Informed Citizen’’ Political Communication 14(4): 405-419.

  • Hagen I. (1994)’Expectations and Consumption Patterns in TV News Viewing’ Media Culture & Society 16(3): 415-428.

  • Hallin D.C. & Mancini P. (2004) Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hallin D. (1996) ‘Commercialism and Professionalism in the American News Media’ in Curran J. & Gurevitch M. (eds.) Mass Media and Society. London: Arnold.

  • Hamilton J. (2004) All the News that’s Fit to Sell. Princeton: Princeton University.

  • Hannerz U. (1996) Transnational Connections: Culture People Places. USA: Routledge.

  • Hjarvard S. (2001) ‘News Media and the Globalization of the Public Sphere’ in Hjarvard S. (ed.) News in a Globalized Society. Göteborg: Nordicom.

  • Holt D.B. (1998) ‘Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption?’ The Journal of Consumer Research 25(1): 1-25.

  • Høst S. (1999) ‘Newspaper Growth in the Television Era – The Norwegian Experience’ Nordicom Review 20(1): 107-128.

  • Høst S. (2007) Avisåret 2006. Salg av Orkla Media. [The newspaper year of 2006. The sale of Orkla Media.] Fredrikstad: Institutt for journalistikk.

  • Høyer S. (1989) Små samtaler og store medier. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

  • Lauf E. (2001) ‘The Vanishing Young Reader’ European Journal of Communication 16(2): 133-143.

  • Lizardo O. (2006) ‘How Cultural Taste Shape Personal Networks’ American Sociological Review 71(October): 778-807.

  • McLeod J.M. Daily K. Guo Z. Eveland Jr. W.P. Bayer J. Yang S. & Wang H. (1996) ‘Community Integration Local Media Use and Democratic Processes’ Communication Research 23(2): 179-209.

  • Medienorge (2007) ( these data are available by NRK TNSGallup Norkring and Medietilsynet.

  • Merton R.K. (1949) ‘Patterns of Influence: A Study of Interpersonal Influence and of Communication Behavior in a Local Community’ in Lazarsfeld P.F. & Stanton F.N. (eds.) Communication Research 1948-1949. New York: Harper & Brothers.

  • Merton R.K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. 1968 Enlarged edition. New York: The Free Press.

  • Moisy C. (1997) ‘Myths of the Global Information Village’ Foreign Policy (Summer 1997).

  • Morley D. (1992) Television Audiences & Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.

  • Moy P. McCluskey M.R. McCoy K. & Spratt M.A. (2004) ‘Political Correlates of Local News Media Use’ Journal of Communication 54: 443-460.

  • Mühleisen W. (2003) Kjønn og sex på TV. [Gender and sex on tv.] Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

  • Norris P. (2000) ‘Global Governance and Cosmopolitan Citizens’ in Nye J.S. (ed.) Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington DC: Brooking Institute Press.

  • Park R.E. (1923) ‘The Natural History of the Newspaper’ The American Journal of Sociology 29(3): 273-289.

  • Peter J. & Valkenburg P.M. (2006) ‘Adolescents’ Internet Use: Testing the ‘Disappearing Digital Divide’ Versus the ‘Emerging Digital Differentiation’ Approach’ Poetics 34(4-5): 293-305.

  • Peterson R.A. & Kern R.M. (1996) ‘Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore’ American Sociological Review 61(5): 900-907.

  • Schudson M. & Tifft S. (2005) ‘American Journalism in Historical Perspective’ in Overholser G. & Jamieson K. (eds.) The Press. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Selwyn N. Gorard S. & Furlong J. (2005) ‘Whose Internet is it Anyway? Exploring Adults’ (Non)Use of the Internet in Everyday Life’ European Journal of Communication. 20(1): 5-26.

  • Selwyn N. (2006) ‘Digital Dividion or Digital Decision? A Study of Non-users and Low-users of Computers’ Poetics 34(4-5): 273-292.

  • Skogerbø E. & Lundby K. (1988) Medieutvikling kultur og regional identitet. [Media development culture and regional identity.] Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo. (rapport 1/1998)

  • Skrbis Zlatjo Kendall G. & Woodward I. (2004) ‘Locating Cosmopolitanism. Between Humanist Ideal and Grounded Social Category’ Theory Culture and Society 21(6): 115-136.

  • Sreberny A. (2002) ‘Collectivity and Connectivity: Diaspora and Mediated Identities’ in Stald G. & Tufte T. (eds.) Global Encounters: Media and Cultural Transformation. Luton: University of Luton Press.

  • Stamm K.R. (1985) Newspaper Use and Community Ties – Towards a Dynamic Theory. New Jersey: Alex Publishing Corporation.

  • Vaage O.F. (2007) Norsk mediebarometer 2006. [Norwegian media barometer 2006.) Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå.

  • Van Rees K. & Van Eijk K. (2003) ‘Media Repertoires of Selective Audiences: The Impact of Status Gender and Age on Media Use’ Poetics. 31(5): 465-490.

  • Waldahl R. Bruun Andersen M. & Rønning H. (2002) Nyheter først og fremst. Norske tv-nyheter: myter og realiteter. [First of all News. Norwegian TV-news: Myths and realities.] Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

  • World Association of Newspapers (2006) World Press Trends 2006. Komárno: ZenithOptimedia.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.223
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.270

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 149 96 3
PDF Downloads 84 64 1