Beyond the Pioneer Days! Where is Reception Research Going?

Open access

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alasuutari P. (1995) Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies. London: Sage.

  • Alsted C. (1989) ‘Semiologi og den kvalitative pretest af reklamefilm’ MedieKultur 10.

  • Ang I. (1991) Desperately Seeking the Audience. London: Routledge.

  • Ang I. & Hermes J. (1991) ‘Gender and/in Media Consumption’ in J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (ed.) Mass Media and Society. London: Edward Arnold.

  • Bergman S. (1998) ‘How a Rabbit is Pulled Out of a Hat: Repertoire Analysis as a Tool for Reconstructing the Meaning of ICTs in Daily Life’ in R. Silverstone & M. Hartmann (1998).

  • Buhl C. (1991) ‘The Consumer’s Ad. The Art of Making Sense of Advertising’ in H.H. Larsen m.fl. (red.) (1991).

  • Camargo E. (1987) ‘The Measurement of Meaning: Sherlock Holmes in Pursuit of the Marlboro Man’ in J. Umiker-Sebeok (ed.) Marketing and Semiotics. New Directions in the Study of Signs for Sale. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Dahl. H. & Buhl C. (1993) Marketing og semiotik. København: Akademisk Forlag.

  • Drotner K. (1994) ‘Ethnographic Enigmas: ‘The Everyday’ in Recent Media Studies’ Cultural Studies vol. 8 no. 2.

  • Drotner K. (1999) Unge medier og modernitet - pejlinger i et foranderligt landskab. København: Borgen.

  • Frey L.R. Botan C.H. Friedman P.G. Kreps G.L. (1991) Investigating Communication. An Introduction to Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Frissen V. & Punie Y. (1998) ‘Never Mind the Gap - Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in ICTUser Research: The Case of Busy Households’ in R. Silverstone & M. Hartmann (1998).

  • Gantz W. (1996) ‘An Examination of the Range and Salience of Gratifications Research Associated with Entertainment Programming’ Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences vol. 1996 no.1 Tokai University Japan.

  • Gjedde L. & Ingemann B. (1999) ‘In the Beginning was the Experience: The Experimental Reception Studies’ paper presented to the 14th Nordic Conference of Media and Communication Research Kungälv Sweden August 1999.

  • Hall S. (1973/1980) ‘Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse’. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies Stencilled Occasional Paper no. 7. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Shorter version published in S. Hall m.fl. (eds.) (1980) Culture Media Language. London: Hutchinson.

  • Hjort A. (1985) ‘Kvinderne og Dallas’ in R. Pittelkow (ed.) Analyser af tv. København: Medusa.

  • Hobson D. (1982) ‘Crossroads’: Drama of a Soap Opera. London: Methuen.

  • Höijer B. (1998) ‘Social Psychological Perspectives in Reception Analysis’ in R. Dickinson R. Harindranath O. Linné (eds.) Approaches to Audiences. A reader. London: Arnold.

  • Höijer B. & Werner A. (1998) Cultural Cognition. New Perspectives in Audience Theory. Göteborg: Nordicom.

  • Højbjerg L. (ed.) (1989) Reception af levende billeder. København: Akademisk Forlag.

  • Ingemann B. (1998) Fatamorgana - Pressefotografiets virkelighed og læsernes. København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.

  • Jensen E. & Tufte B. (1984) ‘Om kvalitativ empirisk receptionsforskning - eksemplificeret ved en undersøgelse af børns brug og oplevelse af video’. Massekultur & Medier nr. 10.

  • Jensen K.B. (ed.) (1998) News of the World. World Cultures Look at Television News. London: Routledge.

  • Jensen K. B. (1995) The Social Semiotics of Mass Communication. London: Sage Publications.

  • Jensen K.B. (1991) ‘Reception Analysis: Mass Communication as the Social Production of Meaning’ in K.B. Jensen & N.W. Jankowski (eds.) A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. London: Routledge.

  • Jensen K.B. (1986) Making Sense of the News: Towards a Theory and an Empirical Model of Reception for the Study of Mass Communication. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetspresse.

  • Jensen K.B. Schrøder K. Stampe T. Søndergaard H. Topsøe-Jensen J. (1994) ‘Super Flow Channel Flows and Audience Flows. A Study of Viewers’ Reception of Television as Flow’ The Nordicom Review no. 2 1994.

  • Jerslev A. (1999) Det er bare film. Unges videofællesskaber og vold på film København: Gyldendal.

  • Larsen H.H. Mick D.G. Alsted C. (red.) (1991) Marketing and Semiotics. Selected Papers from the Copenhagen Symposium København: Handelshøjskolens Forlag.

  • Larsen P. (1974) ‘McCloud som ideologisk og industrielt produkt’ in M.B. Andersen & J. Poulsen (eds.) Mediesociologi København: Rhodos.

  • Lewis J. (1991) The Ideological Octopus. An Exploration of Television and its Audience New York: Routledge.

  • Lindlof T.R. (1995) Qualitative Communication Research Methods London: Sage Publications.

  • Livingstone S. (1998a) ‘Mediated Childhoods. A Comparative Approach to Young People’s Changing Media Environment in Europe’ European Journal of Communication vol. 13 no.4.

  • Livingstone S. (1998b) ‘Audience Research at the Crossroads: The ‘Implied Audience’ in Media and Cultural Theory’ European Journal of Cultural Studies vol. 1 no. 2.

  • Lunt P. & Livingstone S. (1996) ‘Rethinking the Focus Group in Media and Communications Research’ Journal of Communication vol. 46 no. 2.

  • Mayer P. (1998) ‘Qualitative Audience Research in the Context of Computer Media: A Generative Survey’ Sekvens 1998 Årbog fra Institut for Film- og Medievidenskab Københavns Universitet.

  • Medievold - børn og unge (1995) Udvalg vedrørende film- tv- og videovold. København: Kulturministeriet.

  • Mick D. (1986) ‘Consumer Research and Semiotics: Exploring the Morphology of Signs Symbols and Significance’ Journal of Consumer Research vol. 13 1986.

  • Mick D.G. & Buhl C. (1992) ‘A Meaning-Based Model of Advertising Experiences’ Journal of Consumer Research vol. 19.

  • Mick D.G. & Politi L. G. (1989) ‘Consumers’ Interpretation of Advertising Imagery: A Visit to the Hell of Connotation’ in E.C. Hirschman (ed.) Interpretive Consumer Research Provo Mass.: Association for consumer research.

  • Mikkelsen J.F. (1989) ‘Pragmatisk Receptionsteori’ in L. Højbjerg (ed.) (1989).

  • Morley D. (1980) The ‘Nationwide’ Audience. London: British Film Institute.

  • Morley D. (1986) Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure. London: Comedia.

  • Myers G. (1998) ‘Displaying Opinions: Topics and Disagreement in Focus Groups’ Language in Society vol. 27.

  • Nielsen N. Aa. (1982) Seriesening i TV: Når tiden er gået hurtigt er den gået godt. Forskningsrapport nr. 4B782. København: Danmarks Radio.

  • Peirce C.S. (1985) ‘Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs’ in H. Innis (ed.) Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology Bloomington: Indiana U.P.

  • Poulsen J. (1998) Måske-læserne. Dagbladenes muligheder i mediekonkurrencen. Hovedrapport i projektet ‘Måske-læserne’ Institut for Kommunikation. Roskilde Universitetscenter.

  • Povlsen K.K. (1999) Beverly Hills 90210. Soaps ironi og danske unge. Århus: Klim.

  • Radway J. (1988) ‘Reception Study: Ethnography and the Problem of Dispersed Audiences and Nomadic Subjects’ Cultural Studies vol. 2 no. 3. Radway J. (1984) Reading the Romance: Women Patriarchy and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

  • Roe K. (1996) ‘The Uses and Gratifications Approach: A Review of Some Methodological Issues’ Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences vol 1996 no.1 Tokai University Japan.

  • Roscoe T. (1999) ‘The Construction of the World Wide Web Audience’ Media Culture & Society vol. 21.

  • Rosengren K.E. (1996) ‘Review of Klaus Bruhn Jensen The Social Semiotics of Mass Communication’ European Journal of Communication vol. 11 no. 1.

  • Schrøder K. (2000) ‘Making Sense of Audience Discourses. Towards a Multidimensional Model of Mass Media Reception’ The European Journal of Cultural Studies.

  • Schrøder K. (1999) ‘The Best of Both Worlds? Media Audience Research between Rival Paradigms’ in P. Alatuusari (ed.) Rethinking the Media Audience. The New Agenda London: Sage Publications.

  • Schrøder K. (1997) ‘Cynicism and Ambiguity: British Corporate Responsibility Advertisements and their Readers in the 1990s’ in M. Nava et al. (eds.) Buy this Book. Studies in Advertising and Consumption London: Routledge.

  • Schrøder K. (1995) Danskerne og Medierne: Dagligdag og Demokrati Rapport til Regeringens Medieudvalg København: Statsministeriet.

  • Schrøder K. (1994) ‘Audience Semiotics Interpretive Communities and the ‘Ethnographic Turn’ in Media Research’ Media Culture & Society vol. 16 no. 2.

  • Schrøder K. (1989) ‘The Playful Audience: The Continuity of the Popular Cultural Tradition in America’ in M. Skovmand (red.) Media Fictions Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetspresse.

  • Schrøder K. (1988) ‘The Pleasure of DYNASTY in P. Drummond & R. Paterson (red.) Television and its Audience: International Research Perspectives London: British Film Institute.

  • Schrøder K. (1987) ‘Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research’ European Journal of Communication vol. 2 no.1.

  • Schrøder K. (1984) Et måleinstruments anvendelighed - om ‘den ideologiske seismograf’’ Massekultur & Medier 12.

  • Sepstrup P. (1979) ‘Metodiske udviklingsmuligheder i indholdsanalysen’ Bidrag. Bevidsthedssociologisk tidsskrift nr. 9-10 Institut for Litteraturvidenskab Odense Universitet.

  • Silverman D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data London: Sage Publications.

  • Silverstone R. & Hartmann M. (eds) (1998) Methodologies for Media and Information Technology Research in Everyday Life. Graduate Research Centre in Culture and Communication University of Sussex.

  • Silverstone R. (1994) Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.

  • Stald G. (1998) ‘Living with Computers. Young Danes’ Uses of and Thoughts on the Uses of Computers’ Sekvens 1998. Årbog fra Institut for Film- og Medievidenskab Københavns Universitet.

  • Tufte B. (1999) Børn og TV-reklame. Forskningsrapport Danmarks Lærerhøjskole. /WWW.sebnet.dk/

  • Vestergaard T. & Schrøder K. (1985) The Language of Advertising. Oxford og New York: Blackwell.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.223
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.270


Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 134 67 4
PDF Downloads 73 49 3