This article compares the “continuity” produced by private- and public service television companies and discusses whether it can survive in the digital era. In broadcast television, “continuity” carries the industry’s dominating business model: the commercial break. The present disruption to this model, caused by digital technology, over-the-top companies like Netflix and social media like Youtube, has made the television industry eager to adapt to new television viewing habits. However, based on a comparative analysis of the communicative strategies of four television companies in Denmark, the article argues that a traditional delay economy still governs the temporal structures and constructions of continuity. This delay economy draws heavily on the patience of its implied viewers. The article discusses this conceptualization of the audience in the context of an emerging impatience culture in which instant access to personalized audio-visual content and gaming on different devices are part of the viewers’ media experience.
Barra, L . & Scaglioni, M. (2017). Paratexts, Italian style: The promotional cultures of Italian commercial and pay television broadcasters. Critical Studies in Television, 12(2): 156-173. doi: https.//doi.org/10.1177/1749602017698477.
Bruun, H. (2016). The prism of change: “Continuity” in public service television in the digital era. Nordicom Review, 37(2): 33-49. doi: https.//doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0016.
Bruun, H. (2018). Producing the on-air schedule in Danish public service television in the digital era. Critical Studies in Television, 13(2): 137-152. doi: https//doi.org/10.1177/1749602018763700.
Christensen, C., McDonald, R. & Raynor, M. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12): 45-53.
DR (2017). Medieudviklingen 2016 [The media development 2016]. København: DR.
DR (2018). Medieudviklingen 2017 [The media development 2017]. København: DR.
Eastman, S.T & Ferguson, D.A. (2009) (eds.) Media programming: Strategies and practices. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
EBU (2017). Audience trends. Television 2017. Public version. Geneva: EBU.
European Commission. (2018, May). DESI/Digital Economy and Society Index 2017.
Enli, G. & Syvertsen, T. (2016). The end of television – Again! How TV is still influenced by cultural factors in the age of digital intermediaries. Media and Communication, 4(3): 142-153. doi: https.//doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i3.547.
Enli, G. & Van den Bulck, H. (2014). Bye, bye “Hello ladies?”: In-vision announcers as continuity technique in a European post linear television landscape: The case of Flanders and Norway. Television and New Media, 15(5): 453-469. doi: https.//doi.org/10.1177/1527476412462143.
Evans, E. (2015). The economics of free: Freemium games, branding and impatience economy. Convergence, 22(6): 563-580. doi: https.//doi.org/10.1177/1354856514567052.
Evans, E., Coughlan, T. & Coughlan, V. (2017). Building digital estates: Multiscreening, technology management and ephemeral television. Critical Studies in Television, 12(2): 191-205. doi: https.//doi.org/10.1177/1749602017698714.
Ihlebæk, K., Syvertsen, T. & Ytreberg, E. (2014). Keeping them and moving them: TV scheduling in the phase of channel and platform proliferation. Television & New Media, 15(5): 470-486. doi: https.//doi.org/10.117/1527476413479676.
Johnson, C. (2012). Branding television. London: Routledge.
Johnson, C. (2013). The continuity of “continuity”: Flow and the changing experience of watching broadcast television. Key Words, 11: 1-23.
Johnson, C. (2017). Beyond catch-up: VoD interfaces, ITV Hub and the repositioning of television online. Critical Studies in Television, 12(2): 121-138. doi: https.//doi.org/10.1177/1749602017698159.
Lotz, A. (2014). The television will be revolutionized. New York: New York University Press.
Lotz, A. (2017). Portals: A treatise on internet-distributed television. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing.
Mittell, J. (2011). TiVoing childhood: Time shifting a generation’s concept of television. In M. Krackman, M. Binfield, M. T. Payne, A. Perlman & B. Sebok (eds.), Flow TV. Television in the age of media convergence (pp. 146-154). New York: Routledge.
Moe, H. & Van den Bulck, H. (2017). Public service media, universality and personalisation: Mapping strategies and exploring dilemmas. Media, Culture and Society, 40(6): 875-892. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717734407.
Ofcom. (2016). Media lives 2015: A qualitative study. Wave 11 summary report.
Ofcom. (2017). Adults’ media lives 2016: A qualitative study. Wave 12 summary report.
Scannell, P. (1996). Radio, television and modern life. London: Blackwell Publishers.
Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen (2018a). Mediernes udvikling i Danmark: Internetbrug og enheder [The development of the media in Denmark: Internet and devices]. København: Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen.
Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen (2018b). Mediernes udvikling i Danmark: TV [The development of the media in Denmark: TV]. København: Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen.
Stigel, J. (2001). The aesthetics of the moment in television. IN G. Agger & J.F. Jensen (eds.) The Aesthetics of Television (pp. 25-52). Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
Stigel, J. (2006). Continuity og tv-reklame [Continuity and television commercials]. In S. Hjarvard (ed.), Dansk tv’s historie [The history of Danish television] (pp. 291-330). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Vorderer, P., Steen, F. F. & Chan, E. (2006). Motivation. In J. Bryant & P. Vordere (eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 3-18). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.