The technocultural disruption triggered by digitization has radically changed the way in which we consume films outside cinemas and transformed content providers’ business models. In Norway, between 2010 and 2016, DVD/Bluray and subscription-based streaming services switched places as major and minor platforms for home video consumption. Hence, home video consumption has migrated from a high-yielding platform at the head of the home video release cycle to a low-yielding platform at the tail end, where films also face tougher competition from drama series and international content tends to surpass local content. A case study of the earnings generated by local films released by a major distributor in this period suggests that home video revenues have diminished, making local films much more dependent on theatrical revenues and vulnerable to changes in cinema-going behaviour.
Agger, G. & Mortensen, M. (2016). Television drama in the age of media convergence. Northern Lights, 14(1): 3-10.
Ahmed, S. & Sinha, A. (2016). When it pays to wait: Optimizing release timing decisions for secondary channels in the film industry. Journal of Marketing, 80(4): 20-38. doi: http://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0484.
Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York, NY: Hyperion.
Bai, J. & Waldfogel, J. (2012). Movie piracy and sales displacement in two samples of Chinese consumers. Information Economics and Policy, 24: 187-196.
Baumgarten, P. A., Farber, D. C. & Fleicher, M. (1992). Producing, financing and distributing film: A comprehensive legal and business guide. New York, NY: Limelight Editions.
Benjamin, L. (2017). Release windows and revenue streams. In J. E. Squire (ed.), The movie business book (4th ed., pp. 329-352). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bower, J. L. & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 73(1): 43-53.
Doyle, G. (2016). Digitization and changing windowing strategies in the television industry: Negotiating new windows on the world. Television & New Media, 17(7): 629-645. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416641194.
Elberse, A. (2013). Blockbusters: Hit-making, risk-taking, and the big business of entertainment. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Company.
Elberse, A. & Eliashberg, J. (2003). Demand and supply dynamics of sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Science, 22(4): 329-354.
Eriksson, P. & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. London: SAGE.
Finney, A. & Triana, E. (2015). The international film business: A market guide beyond Hollywood (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gaustad, T. (2009). Sweetening the deal: To what extent can public funding attract private film investors? Nordicom Review, 30(2): 179-197.
Gaustad, T. (2013). Creating the image: A transaction cost analysis of joint value creation in the motion picture industry. Oslo: BI Norwegian Business School.
Gaustad, T. (2017). Det smale mangfoldet: kinomarkedet etter digitaliseringen [Narrow diversity: The theatrical market after digitization]. Praktisk Økonomi & Finans, 33(2): 203-219.
Gaustad, T., Theie, M. G., Eidsvold-Tøien, I., Torp, Ø., Gran, A.-B. & Espelien, A. (2018). Utredning av pengestrømmene i verdikjeden for norske filmer og serier [Narrow diversity: The theatrical market after digitization]. Oslo: Menon Economics.
Hadida, A. L. (2009). Motion picture performance: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(3): 297-335.
Haimoff, I. (2017). Studio accounting. In J. E. Squire (ed.), The movie business book (pp. 353-368). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Henning, V., Sattler, H., Eggers, F. & Houston, M. B. (2007). The last picture show? Timing and order of movie distribution channels. Journal of Marketing, 71(4): 63-83.
Hennig-Thurau, T. & Houston, M. B. (2019). Entertainment science: Data analytics and practical theory for movies, games, books, and music. Cham: Springer.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Houston, M. B. & Walsh, G. (2006). The differing roles of success drivers across sequential channels: An application to the motion picture industry. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4): 559-575.
Hoskins, C., Mirus, R. & Rozeboom, W. (1988). Reasons for the US dominance of the international trade in television programmes. Media, Culture & Society, 10: 499-515.
Kanzler, M. & Talavera, J. (2018). Public funding for film and audio-visual works in Europe: Key industry statistics 2010-2014. In P. C. Murschetz, R. Teichmann & M. Karmasin (eds.), Handbook of state aid for film: Finance, industries and regulation (pp. 153-174). Berlin: Springer.
Lehmann, D. R. & Weinberg, C. B. (2000). Sales through sequential distribution channels: An application to movies and videos. Journal of Marketing, 64(3): 18-33.
Litman, B. R. (1998). The motion picture mega-industry. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Murphy, A. D. (1995). The basic loop. Published by the author through the Peter Stark Producing Program, School of Cinema-Television, University of Southern California. Los Angeles, CA.
Murschetz, P. C., Teichmann, R. & Karmasin, M. (2018). Why study state aid for film? A necessary clarification. In P. C. Murschetz, R. Teichmann & M. Karmasin (eds.), Handbook of state aid for film (pp. 1-22). Berlin: Springer.
Norwegian Ministry of Culture. (2015). En framtidsrettet filmpolitikk. Meld. St. 30 (2014-2015) [A provident film policy. Report no. 30 (2014-2015) to the Storting]. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Culture.
Owen, B. M. & Wildman, S. S. (1992). Video economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Penley, C. & Ross, A. (1991). Technoculture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.