News automation is an emerging field within journalism, with the potential to transform newswork. Increasing access to data, combined with developing technology, will allow further inquiries into automated journalism. Producing news text using NLG (natural language generation) is currently largely undertaken in specific, predictable news domains, such as sports or finance. This interdisciplinary study investigates how elite media representatives from Finland, Europe and the US imagine the affordances of this emerging technology for their organization. Our analysis shows how the affordances of news automation are imagined as providing efficiency, increasing output and aiding in reallocating resources to pursue quality journalism. The affordances are, however, constrained by such factors as access to structured data, the quality of automation and a lack of relevant skills. In its current form, automated text generation is seen as providing only limited benefits to news organizations that are already imagining further possibilities of automation.
Ahuja, M., Patel, P. & Suh, A. (2018). The influence of social media on collective action in the context of digital activism: An affordance approach. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2203-2212). NY, USA: Hawaii International
Arenberg, T. & Lowrey, W. (2018). The impact of web metrics on community news decisions: A resource dependence perspective. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018801318.
Belair-Gagnon, V. & Holton, A. E. (2018). Boundary work, interloper media, and analytics in news-rooms: An analysis of the roles of web analytics companies in news production. Digital Journalism, 6(4): 492-508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1445001.
Blewett, C. & Hugo, W. (2016). Actant affordances: A brief history of affordance theory and a Latourian extension for education technology research. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 4(1): 55-73.
boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 662-679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77-101.
Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bucher, T. & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Mar-wick & T. Poell (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233-253). Sage Publications.
Carlson, M. (2015). The robotic reporter: Automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority. Digital Journalism, 3(3): 416-431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976412.
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Couldry, N. (2017). The myth of big data. In M. T. Schäfer & K. van Es (eds.), The datafied society (pp. 235-239). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Dietrich, D., Gray, J., McNamara, T., Poikola, A., Pollock, R., Tait, J. & Zijlstra, T. (2012). The open data handbook: An open knowledge foundation project. Retrieved from http://opendatahand-book.org/ [accessed 2018, February 21].
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Faraj, S. & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi & J. Kallinikos (eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237-258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gatt, A. & Krahmer, E. (2018). Survey of the state of the art in natural language generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 61: 65-170. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.5477.
Gaver, W. W. (1991, April). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 79-84). ACM.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Gill, P., Erramilli, V., Chaintreau, A., Krishnamurthy, B., Papagiannaki, K. & Rodriguez, P. (2013). Follow the money: Understanding economics of online aggregation and advertising. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement (pp. 141-148). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2504730.2504768.
Glahn, H. R. (1970). Computer-produced worded forecasts. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 51(12): 1126-1131.
Glahn, H. R. (1979). Computer worded forecasts. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 60(1): 4-11.
Goldberg, E., Driedger, N. & Kittredge, R. I. (1994). Using natural-language processing to produce weather forecasts. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2: 45-53.
Graefe, A., Haim, M., Haarmann, B. & Brosius, H. B. (2018). Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability. Journalism, 19(5): 595-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916641269.
Grint, K. & Woolgar, S. (1997). The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Jungkvist, K. (2018). Digital subscriptions – A challenge for survival. Paper presented at the seminar Vem betalar för journalistiken? [Who will pay for journalism?]. 2018, December 14, at the Swedish School of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki.
Klein, H. K. & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1): 28-52.
Küng, L. (2017). Strategic management in the media: Theory to practice. London: Sage Publications.
Leppänen, L., Munezero, M., Granroth-Wilding, M. & Toivonen, H. (2017). Data-driven news generation for automated journalism. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Natural Language Generation (pp. 188-197). doi: http://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-35.
Lewis, S. C. & Usher, N. (2016). Trading zones, boundary objects, and the pursuit of news innovation: A case study of journalists and programmers. Convergence, 22(5): 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515623865.
Wu, S., Tandoc Jr, E. C. & Salmon, C. T. (2018). Journalism reconfigured: Assessing human–machine relations and the autonomous power of automation in news production. Journalism Studies, 1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1521299.