Documenting Attachment:

Open access


From 2002 to 2018, Denmark was the only country in the world to enforce a migration law demanding that couples seeking family reunification in Denmark documented their combined “attachment” to the Danish nation. This article investigates the practice of documenting such national attachment through the so-called “application packets”. Investigating the attachment requirement as a migration political tool with affective investments and implications, we suggest that the documentation process can be understood as a performative process in which the application packets lay out a trajectory of “happy objects” (Ahmed 2010): the application, family reunification, a residence permit and ultimately the nation itself. Although the applicants are urged to orient themselves towards the Danish nation as a happy object with the promise of a possible future in Denmark, this promise may have cruel implications for the applicants. Suggesting that an interdisciplinary meeting point between the fields of migration studies and cultural/discursive studies may form as fruitful, this article invites readers to think about the biopolitics of border control in affective terms

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ahmed S 2004 The cultural politics of emotion Routledge New York.

  • Ahmed S 2007 Queer phenomenology. orientations objects others Duke University Press Durham.

  • Ahmed S 2010 The promise of happiness Duke University Press Durham.

  • Austin JL 1962 How to do things with words Oxford University Press London.

  • Bak Jørgensen M 2013 ‘Danish regulations on marriage migration: policy understandings of transnational marriages’ in Transnational marriage: new perspectives from Europe and beyond ed. K Charsley Routledge London pp. 60-78.

  • Bech EC & Mouritsen P 2013 ‘Restricting the right to family migration in Denmark: when human rights collide with a welfare state under pressure’ in Europe’s immigration challenge: reconciling work welfare and mobility eds. E Jurado & G Brochmann I.B. Tauris London pp. 159-184.

  • Berlant L 2006 ‘Cruel optimism’ A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies vol. 17 no. 3 pp. 20-36.

  • Berlant L 2011 Cruel optimism Duke University Press Durham.

  • Bissenbakker M 2019 ‘Attachment required: the affective governmentality of marriage migration in the Danish Aliens Act 2000-2018’ International Political Sociology vol. 13 pp. 181-197.

  • Block L 2015 ‘Regulating membership: explaining restriction and stratification of family migration in Europe’ Journal of Family Issues vol. 36 no. 11 pp. 1433-1452.

  • Bonjour S & Kraler A 2015 ‘Introduction: family migration as an integration issue? Policy perspectives and academic insights’ Journal of Family Issues vol. 36 no. 11 pp. 1407-1432.

  • Bruun Eriksen C 2017 ‘Det er ikke slut før den fede dame taber sig: En form- og normkritik af tv-programmet “Min krop til skræk og advarsel”‘ Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning vol. 41 no. 2 pp. 106-123.

  • Dahler-Larsen P 2005 ‘‘Dokumenter som objektiveret social virkelighed’ [Documents as objectified social reality]’ in Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv eds. M Järvinen & N Mik-Meyer Hans Reitzels Forlag Denmark pp. 235-254.

  • Danish Immigration Service 2018a New to Denmark: Application Packet FA1. Available from: <>. [Last accessed 30.01.2018].

  • Danish Immigration Service 2018b New to Denmark: Application Packet FA10. Available from: <>. [Last accessed 30.01.2018].

  • D’Aoust A 2013 ‘In the name of love: marriage migration governmentality and technologies of love’ International Political Sociology vol. 7 pp. 258-274.

  • D’Aoust A-M 2018 ‘A moral economy of suspicion: love and marriage migration management practices in the United Kingdom’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space vol. 36 no. 1 pp. 40-59.

  • Dilou Jacobsen B & Vedsted-Hansen J 2017 ‘Familiesammenføring’ in Udlændingeret: Indrejse Visum Asyl Familiesammenføring eds. B Dilou Jacobsen NH Larsen NM Lassen J Lindholm & J Vedsted-Hansen Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag København pp. 461-571.

  • Eggebø H 2013 ‘‘With a heavy heart’: ethics emotions and rationality in Norwegian immigration administration’ Sociology vol. 47 no. 2 pp. 301-317.

  • European Court of Human Rights 2016 Biao V. Denmark (Application No. 38590/10). <{%22itemid%22:[%22001-163115%22]}>. [Last accessed 29.8.2017].

  • Faber D Hjort-Pedersen M Madsen D & Tournay J 1998 Introduktion til dansk juridisk sprogbrug Handelshøjskolens Forlag Denmark.

  • Fair LS 2010 ‘Why can’t I get married?’ – Denmark and the ‘twenty-four year law’ Social & Cultural Geography vol. 11 no. 2 pp. 139-153.

  • Foucault M 1978 The history of sexuality: an introduction Vol. 1 Penguin London.

  • Foucault M 2003 Society must be defended: lectures at the college de France1975-1976 Picador New York.

  • Immigration Appeals Board 2019 Tilknytningskravet [Attachment requirement]. Available from: <>. [Last accessed: 2.7.2019].

  • Justesen L 2005 ‘Dokumenter i netværk’ in Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv eds. M Järvinen & N Mik-Meyer Hans Reitzels Forlag Denmark pp. 215-234.

  • Kofman E Saharso S & Vacchelli E 2015 ‘Gendered perspectives on integration discourses and measures’ International Migration vol. 53 no. 4 pp. 77-89.

  • Laclau E & Mouffe C 2001 [1985] Hegemony & socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics Verso London.

  • Liversage A & Rytter M 2014 Ægteskab og Migration. Konsekvenser af de Danske familiesammenføringsregler 2002–2012 [Marriage and migration. Consequences of the Danish family reunification rules 20022012] Aarhus Universitetsforlag Aarhus Denmark.

  • Lund Pedersen L 2012 ‘Intimacy with the Danish nation-state: my partner the Danish state and I – a case study of family reunification in Denmark’ in Whiteness and postcolonialism in the Nordic region: exceptionalism migrant other and national identities eds. K Loftsdottir & L Jensen Ashgate London pp. 141-157.

  • Ministry of Foreigners and Integration 2018 L231. Proposal for law amending the Aliens Act (Reform of the rules on spouse reunification with new integration requirements in place of the attachment requirement tightened housing requirement etc.)]. [Forslag til Lov om ændring af udlændingeloven (Reform af reglerne om ægtefællesammenføring med nyt integrationskrav i stedet for tilknytningskravet skærpet boligkrav m.v.)].

  • Ministry of Integration 2002 L152: Proposal for law amending the Aliens Act and the Marriage Act including several laws [Forslag til lov om ændring af udlændingeloven og ægteskabsloven med flere love].

  • Ministry for Refugees Immigrants and Integration & Danish Immigration Service 2005 Notes on the Application of the Attachment Requirement in Spousal Family Reunification [Ministeriet for flygtninge indvandrere og integration & Udlændingestyrelsen. Notat om anvendelsen af tilknytningskravet ved ægtefællesammenføring].

  • Moeslund K & Strasser E 2008 Family migration policies in Denmark NODE Policy Report Vienna BMWF/ICMPD.

  • Mühleisen W Røthing Å & Bang Svendsen SH 2012 ‘Norwegian sexualities. Assimilation and exclusion in Norwegian immigration policy’ Sexualities vol. 15 no. 2 pp. 139-155.

  • Myong L & Bissenbakker M forthcoming ‘The Turn to Attachment: Analysing Migration Regulation and Transnational Adoption in a Danish Context’.

  • Myrdahl EM 2010 ‘Legislating love: Norwegian family reunification law as a racial project’ Social & Cultural Geography vol. 11 no. 2 pp. 103-116.

  • Olsen B Liisberg MV & Kjærum M 2004 Ægtefællesammenføring i Danmark. Udredning no. 1 [Family Reunification of Spouses. Report no. 1] Danish Institute for Human Rights.

  • Pellander S 2015 ‘“An acceptable marriage”: marriage migration and moral gate keeping in Finland’ Journal of Family Issues vol. 36 no. 11 pp. 1472-1489.

  • Posocco S 2011 ‘Expedientes: fissured legality and affective states in the transnational adoption archives in Guatemala’ Law Culture and the Humanities vol. 7 no. 3 pp. 1-23.

  • Rytter M 2010 ‘“The family of Denmark” and “the Aliens”: kinship images in Danish integration politics’ Ethos: Journal of Anthropology vol. 75 no. 3 pp. 301-322.

  • Schultz-Nielsen ML & Tranæs T 2009 Ægteskabsmønsteret for unge med indvandrerbaggrund: Konsekvenser af ændringer i udlændingelovgivningen i 2000 og 2002 [Marriage Patterns Among Young People from Ethnic Minorities: The Result of Changes in Migration Legislation in 2000 and 2002]. Rockwool Foundation Research Unit. University of Southern Denmark 2009.

  • Staver A 2014 From right to earned privilege? The development of stricter family immigration rules in Denmark Norway and the United Kingdom Ph.D. thesis University of Toronto.

  • WAIT – Waiting for an uncertain future: the temporalities of irregular migration University of Bergen. Available from: <>. [Last accessed 8.10.2019]

  • Wemyss G Yuval-Davis N & Cassidy K 2018 ‘‘Beauty and the beast’: everyday bordering and ‘sham marriage’ - discourse’ Political Geography vol. 66 pp. 151-160.

  • Wray H 2011 Regulating marriage migration into the UK: a stranger in the home Ashgate Surrey England.

  • Yuval-Davis N 2011 The politics of belonging – intersectional contestations Sage London.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 55 55 16
PDF Downloads 66 66 23