Family Migration and Integration:

Open access

Abstract

This article investigates the link between family migration and integration. It is based on a literature review of existing research across the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, focusing on examples from Denmark and Norway. Much of the existing literature on family migration and integration analyses legal changes and policy arguments. Focusing on literature about integration and regulation outcomes, we identify the following two dominant topic areas in existing academic work: (1) empirical studies of labour market integration outcomes for family migrants – some limited to focusing on intra-marriages – and (2) research about the consequences of family immigration regulations. The article highlights the need for a new research agenda that moves beyond studies of intra-ethnic marriages and labour market participation to include all groups of family migrants and different dimensions of integration. Moreover, it should analyse long-term effects of family migration regulations, as well as post-entry regulations and social structures.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aalandslid V & Tronstad KR 2010 Familieinnvandring kjønn og sysselsetting Statistisk sentralbyrå Oslo. Available from: <https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/rapp_201023/rapp_201023.pdf>. [Last accessed 21.3.2018].

  • Anthias F Cederberg M Barber T & Ayres R 2013a ‘Chapter 3: welfare regimes markets and policies: the experiences of migrant women’ in Paradoxes of integration: female migrants in Europe eds. F Anthias M Kontos & M Morokvasic Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York and London pp. 37-58.

  • Anthias F Kontos M & Morokvasic M 2013b Paradoxes of integration: female migrants in Europe Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York and London.

  • Bailey A & Boyle P 2004 ‘Untying and retying family migration in the New Europe’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 30 no. 2 pp. 229-241.

  • Baldassar L & Merla L 2014 Transnational families migration and the circulation of care: understanding mobility and absence in family life. Routledge Transnationalism Series Routledge UK.

  • Banerjee R & Phan M 2014 ‘Do tied movers get tied down? The occupational displacement of dependent applicant immigrants in Canada’ Journal of International Migration and Integration vol. 16 no. 2 pp. 333-353 DOI:10.1007/s12134-014-0341-9.

  • Barker V 2017 Nordic nationalism and penal order: walling the welfare state Routledge Abington UK.

  • Beaton E Musgrave A & Liebl J 2018 Safe but not settled: the impact of family separation on refugees in the UK. Oxfam. Available from: <https://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/safe-but-not-settled-the-impact-of-family-separation-on-refugees-in-theuk-620409>. [Last accessed 15.3.2019].

  • Bech EC Borevi K & Mouritsen P 2017 ‘A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark Norway and Sweden’ Comparative Migration Studies vol. 5 no. 1 pp. 7 DOI:10.1186/s40878-016-0046-7.

  • Becker B 2011 ‘Cognitive and language skills of Turkish children in Germany: a comparison of the second and third generation and mixed generational groups’ International Migration Review vol. 45 no. 2 pp. 426-459 DOI:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00853.x.

  • Bevelander P 2011 ‘The employment integration of resettled refugees asylum claimants and family reunion migrants in Sweden’ Refugee Survey Quarterly vol. 30 no. 1 pp. 22-43 DOI:10.1093/rsq/hdq041.

  • Block L & Bonjour S 2013 ‘Fortress Europe or Europe of rights? The Europeanisation of family migration policies in France Germany and the Netherlands’ European Journal of Migration and Law vol. 15 no. 2 pp. 203-224 DOI:10.1163/15718166-12342031.

  • Bonizzoni Paola (2018) “Policing the Intimate Borders of the Nation: A Review of Recent Trends in Family-Related Forms of Immigration Control” in J. Mulholland N. Montagna og E. Sanders-McDonagh (red.) Gendering Nationalism: Intersections of Nation Gender and Sexuality Cham: Springer International Publishing side 223-239.

  • Bonjour S & Duyvendak JW 2018 ‘The “migrant with poor prospects”: racialized intersections of class and culture in Dutch civic integration debates’ Ethnic and Racial Studies vol. 41 no. 5 pp. 882-900 DOI:10.1080/01419870.2017.1339897.

  • Bonjour S & Kraler A 2015 ‘Introduction: family migration as an integration issue? Policy perspectives and academic insights’ Journal of Family Issues vol. 36 no. 11 pp. 1407-1432.

  • Bonke J & Schultz-Nielsen ML 2013 Integration blandt ikke-vestlige indvandrere – Arbejde familie netværk og forbrug. b. Rockwool Fondens Forskningsenhed og Syddansk Universitetsforlag. Available from: <https://www.rockwoolfonden.dk/app/uploads/2015/12/Integration-blandt-ikke-vestlige-indvandrere.pdf>. [Last accessed 2.3.2018].

  • Bratsberg B & Raaum O 2010 Effekter av krav om forsørgelsesevne ved familiegjenforening Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research Oslo. Available from: <http://www.frisch.uio.no/publikasjoner/pdf/rapp10_04.pdf>. [Last accessed 12.4.2018].

  • Bratsberg B Raaum O & Roed K 2017 ‘Immigrant labor market integration across admission classes’ IZA Institute of Labor Economics vol. Discussion paper IZA DP No. 10513.

  • Brekke I & Rogstad J 2011 ‘Godt gift? Betydningen av ektefellens landbakgrunn for kvinnelige etterkommeres arbeidsdeltakelse’ Søkelys på arbeidslivet vol. 28 no. 1-2 pp. 107-123.

  • Brekke J-P Røed M & Schøne P 2017 ‘Reduction or deflection? The effect of asylum policy on interconnected asylum flows’ Migration Studies vol. 5 no. 1 pp. 65-96 DOI:10.1093/migration/mnw028.

  • Brochmann G Petersen K Vad Jønsson H Borevi K & Hagelund A 2010 Velferdens grenser: innvandringspolitikk og velferdsstat i Skandinavia 1945-2010 Universitetsforl Oslo.

  • Brubaker R 2001 ‘The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France Germany and the United States’ Ethnic and Racial Studies vol. 24 no. 4 pp. 531-548 DOI:10.1080/01419870120049770.

  • Bryceson DF & Vuorela U 2002 The transnational family: new European frontiers and global networks Berg Oxford.

  • Carol S Ersanilli E & Wagner M 2014 ‘Spousal choice among the children of Turkish and Moroccan immigrants in six European countries: transnational spouse or co-ethnic migrant?’ International Migration Review vol. 48 no. 2 pp. 387-414 DOI:10.1111/imre.12068.

  • Casier M Heyse P Clycq N Zemni S & Timmerman C 2013 ‘Breaking the in-group out-group: shifting boundaries in transnational partner choice processes of individuals of Moroccan Tunisian Algerian Turkish Punjabi Sikh Pakistani and Albanian descent in Belgium’ The Sociological Review vol. 61 no. 3 pp. 460-478 DOI:10.1111/1467-954X.12029.

  • Castles S 2017 Migration citizenship and identity. Selected essays Edward Edgar Publishing Sydney.

  • Çelikaksoy A 2007 ‘A wage premium or penalty: an analysis of endogamous marriage effects among the children of immigrants?’ Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift vol. 145 no. 3 pp. 288-311.

  • Charsley K 2005 ‘Unhappy husbands: masculinity and migration in transnational Pakistani marriages’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute vol. 11 no. 1 pp. 85-105 DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2005.00227.x.

  • Charsley K 2012 Transnational marriage: new perspectives from Europe and beyond Routledge New York.

  • Charsley K Bolognani M Spencer S Ersanilli E & Jayaweera H 2016a Marriage migration and integration University of Bristol Bristol. Available from: <https://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/ethnicity/documents/Marriage%20Migration%20and%20Integration_final%20report.pdf>. [Last accessed 9.11.2017].

  • Charsley K Bolognani M & Spencer S 2016b ‘Marriage migration and integration: interrogating assumptions in academic and policy debates’ Ethnicities vol. 17 no. 4 pp. 469-490 DOI:10.1177/1468796816677329.

  • Charsley K & Liversage A 2015 ‘Silenced husbands: Muslim marriage migration and masculity’ Men and Masculinities vol. 18 no. 4 pp. 489-508 DOI:10.1177/1097184´15575112.

  • Charsley K 2019 ‘Marrying ‘in’/marrying ‘out’? Borders kinship ethnicity and British Pakistani transnational marriages’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies: 1-18 DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625131

  • Chiswick BR Lee YL & Miller PW 2006 ‘Immigrants’ Language Skills and Visa Category’ International Migration Review vol. 40 no. 2 pp. 419-450 DOI:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2006.00023.x.

  • Constable N 2005 Cross-border marriages: gender and mobility in transnational Asia University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia PA.

  • Dale A & Ahmed S 2011 ‘Marriage and employment patterns amongst UK-raised Indian Pakistani and Bangladeshi women’ Ethnic and Racial Studies vol. 34 no. 6 pp. 902-924daug DOI:10.1080/01419870.2011.564058.

  • Damir-Geilsdorf S & Sabra M 2018 Disrupted families: the gendered impacts of family reunification policies on Syrian refugees in Germany. UN Women. Available from: <http://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2018/4/discussion-paper-disrupted-families>. [Last accessed 15.3.2019].

  • Danckert B & Jakobsen V 2014 ‘Ændringer i ægteskabs- og uddannelsesmønstre hos etniske minoriteter’ in Ægteskab og migration: konsekvenser af de danske familiesammenføringsregler 2002-2012 eds. A Liversage & M Rytter Aarhus Universitetsforlag pp. 53-73.

  • Daugstad G 2009 Søker krake make?: ekteskap og pardannelse blant unge med bakgrunn fra Tyrkia Pakistan og Vietnam. Oslo.

  • Dzamarija MT & Sandnes T 2016 Familieinnvandring og ekteskapsmønster 1990–2015. Statistisk Sentralbyrå (SSB) Oslo. Available from: <https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/familieinnvandring-og-ekteskapsmonster-19902015>. [Last accessed 12.4.2018].

  • Eggebø H 2010 ‘The problem of dependency: immigration gender and the welfare state’ Social Politics: International Studies in Gender State & Society vol. 17 no. 3 pp. 295-322 DOI:10.1093/sp/jxq013.

  • Eggebø H 2013 The regulation of marriage migration to Norway PhD Thesis The Faculty of Social Sciences University of Bergen.

  • Eggebø H & Brekke J-P 2018 Family migration and integration: a literature review. N. R. Institute Bodø. Available from: <http://www.nordlandsforskning.no/getfile.php/1322503-1526993549/Dokumenter/Rapporter/1018/NF-report%204_2018.pdf>. [Last accessed 23.5.2018].

  • Elrick J & Lightman N 2014 ‘Sorting or shaping? The gendered economic outcomes of immigration policy in Canada’ International Migration Review vol. 50 no. 2 pp. 352-384entz DOI:10.1111/imre.12110.

  • Entzinger H Saharso S & Scholten P 2011 Shaping immigration for integration? The Dutch migration-integration nexus in perspective Consolidated PROSINT Country Report PROSINT.

  • Fernandez NT & Jensen TG 2014 ‘Intimate contradictions: comparing the impact of Danish family unification laws on Pakistani and Cuban Marriage Migrants’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 40 no. 7 pp. 1136-1153 DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2013.854692.

  • Garcés-Mascarenas B & Penninx R 2016 Integration processes and policies in Europe Springer Open.

  • Griffiths M & Morgan C 2017 Immigration enforcement and Article 8 rights: mixed-immigration status families political emphasis on forced removal is splitting up and harming families University of Bristol Bristol. Available from: < http://www.bris.ac.uk/media-library/sites/policybristol/briefings-and-reports-pdfs/2017-briefings-reports-pdfs/PolicyBristol_Report_November_2017_mixed-immigration_status_families.pdf >. [Last accessed 09.10.2019].

  • Grillo R 2008 The family in question: immigrant and ethnic minorities in multicultural Europe Amsterdam University Press Amsterdam.

  • Groenendijk K 2011 ‘Pre-departure integration strategies in the European Union: integration or immigration policy?’ European Journal of Migration and Law vol. 13 no. 1 pp. 1-30 DOI:10.1163/157181611x558191.

  • Gubernskaya Z & Dreby J 2017 ‘US Immigration policy and the case for family unity’ Journal on Migration and Human Security vol. 5 no. 2 pp. 417-430 DOI:10.14240/jmhs.v5i2.91.

  • Gutekunst M 2015 ‘Language as a new instrument of border control: the regulation of marriage migration from Morocco to Germany’ The Journal of North African Studies vol. 20 pp. 1-13 DOI:10.1080/13629387.2015.1065038.

  • Hernes V 2018 ‘Cross-national convergence in times of crisis? Integration policies before during and after the refugee crisis’ West European Politics vol. 41 no. 6 pp. 1305-1329 DOI:10.1080/01402382.2018.1429748.

  • Jakobsen V & Liversage A 2017 ‘From work to welfare: institutional arrangements shaping Turkish marriage migrants’ gendered trajectories into a new society’ International Migration Review vol. 51 no. 4 pp. 964-998 DOI: 10.1111/imre.12264.

  • Kofman E 2004 ‘Family-related migration: a critical review of European studies’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 30 no. 2 pp. 243-262 DOI:10.1080/1369183042000200687.

  • Kofman E 2018 ‘Family migration as a class matter’ International Migration vol. 56 no. 4 pp. 33-46 DOI:10.1111/imig.12433.

  • Kofman E Saharso S & Vacchelli E 2015 ‘Gendered perspectives on integration discourses and measures’ International Migration vol. 53 no. 4 pp. 77-89 DOI:10.1111/imig.12102.

  • Kulu-Glasgow I & Leerkes A 2013 ‘Restricting Turkish marriage migration? National policy couples’ coping strategies and international obligations’ Migration Letters vol. 10 no. 3 pp. 369-382.

  • Larsen MR & Lauritzen HH 2014 ‘Beskæftigelsesmæssige effekter af de skærpede betingelser for familiesammenføring’ in Ægteskab og migration: konsekvenser af de danske familiesammenføringsregler 2002-2012 eds. A Liversage & M Rytter Universitetsforlag Aarhus pp. 75-96.

  • Liversage A 2009 ‘Vital conjunctures shifting horizons: high-skilled female immigrants looking for work’ Work Employment and Society vol. 23 no. 1 pp. 120-41 DOI:10.1177/0950017008099781.

  • Liversage A & Rytter M 2014 Ægteskab og migration: konsekvenser af de danske familiesammenføringsregler 2002-2012 Aarhus Universitetsforlag Aarhus.

  • Miller A Hess JM Bybee D & Goodkind JR 2018 ‘Understanding the mental health consequences of family separation for refugees: Implications for policy and practice’ Am J Orthopsychiatry vol. 88 no. 1 pp. 26-37 DOI:10.1037/ort0000272.

  • Mohn FA 2016 Marital fault lines: spouse selection and socioeconomic assimilation among the immigrant population in Norway PhD-Thesis Department of Sociology and Human Geography University of Oslo.

  • Moret J Andrikopoulos A & Dahinden J 2019 ‘Contesting categories: cross-border marriages from the perspectives of the state spouses and researchers’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1-18 DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625124.

  • Myrdahl EM 2010 Orientalist knowledges at the European periphery: Norwegian racial projects 1970-2005 PhD-thesis The Faculty of the Graduate School University of Minnesota.

  • Nadim M 2014 ‘Transnational marriages and second-generation women’s employment’ Nordic Journal of Migration Research vol. 4 no. 3 pp. 99-107 DOI:10.2478/njmr-2014-0019.

  • Neuwahl N 2014 ‘“No German no love: language proficiency as a condition for visas of Turkish spouses under EU law”‘ Marmara Journal of European Studies vol. 21 no. 2 pp. 1-36.

  • OECD 2017 International Migration Outlook 2017 OECD Publishing Paris. Available from: <http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/social-issues-migration-health/international-migration-outlook-2017_migr_outlook-2017-en#.WgVUsWjWxaR#page3>. [Last accessed 10.11.2017].

  • Oliver C 2013 The impact of restrictions and entitlements on the integration of family migrants: a comparative report COMPAS. Available from: < https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/PR-2013-IMPACIM_Comparative.pdf >. [Last accessed 9.10.2019].

  • Patel P 2002 ‘Back to the future: avoiding Déjà Vu in resisting racism’ in Rethinking antiracisms: from theory to practice eds. F. Anthias & C. Lloyd Routledge London pp. 128-148.

  • Pellander S 2016 Gatekeepers of the family: Regulation family migration to Finland. PhD. Department of Political and Economic Studies Faculty of Social Science University of Helsinki.

  • Rodríguez-García D 2015 ‘Intermarriage and integration revisited: international experiences and cross-disciplinary approaches’ The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science vol. 662 no. 1 pp. 8-36 DOI:10.1177/0002716215601397.

  • Rytter M 2018 ‘Writing against integration: Danish imaginaries of culture race and belonging’ Ethnos pp. 1-20 DOI:10.1080/00141844.2018.1458745.

  • Schmidt G 2014 ‘Troubled by law: the subjectivizing effects of Danish marriage reunification laws’ International Migration vol. 52 no. 3 pp. 129-143 DOI:10.1111/imig.12132.

  • Schmidt G Liversage A Graversen BK Jensen TG & Jacobsen V 2009 Ændrede familiesammenføringsregler Hvad har de nye regler betydet for pardannelsesmønstret blandt etniske minoriteter? Available from: <http://www.sfi.dk/Default.aspx?ID=4681&Action=1&NewsId=2337&PID=9267>. [Last accessed 15.7.2010].

  • Scholten PWA Entzinger H Kofman E Hollomey C Lechner C Vacchelli E et al. 2012 Integration from abroad? Perception and Impacts of pre-entry tests for third country nationals International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD). Available from: <http://research.icmpd.org/fileadmin/Research-Website/Project_material/PROSINT/Reports/WP4_CompRep_Final_submitted.pdf>. [Last accessed 12.4.2018].

  • Schweitzer R 2015 ‘A stratified right to family life? On the logic(s) and legitimacy of granting differential access to family reunification for third-country nationals living within the EU’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 41 no. 13 pp. 2130-2148 DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1037256.

  • Sébastien Chauvin Manuela Salcedo Robledo Timo Koren & Joël Illidge (2019) Class mobility and inequality in the lives of same-sex couples with mixed legal statuses Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625137

  • Sirriyeh A 2015 ‘‘All you need is love and £18600’: Class and the new UK family migration rules’ Critical Social Policy vol. 35 no. 2 pp. 228-247 DOI:10.1177/0261018314563039.

  • Sorana T 2016 ‘Putting social capital in (a family) perspective: determinants of labour market outcomes among Senegalese women in Europe’ International Journal of Comparative Sociology vol. 57 no. 3 pp. 127-150 DOI:10.1177/0020715216653998.

  • Staver A 2014 From right to earned privilege? The development of stricter family immigration rules in Denmark Norway and the United Kingdom PhD Political Science University of Toronto.

  • Staver A 2015 ‘Hard work for love: the economic drift in Norwegian family immigration and integration policies’ Journal of Family Issues vol. 36 no. 11 pp. 1453 DOI:10.1177/0192513´14557491.

  • Sterckx L 2015 ‘Marrying “In” or “Out”? Scrutinizing the link between integration and the partner choice of young people of Turkish and Moroccan origin in the Netherlands’ Journal of Family Issues vol. 36 no. 11 pp. 1550-1570 DOI:10.1177/0192513´14558296.

  • Strik T de Hart B & Nissen E 2013 Family reunification: a barrier or facilitator of integration? A comparative study Immigrant Council of Ireland. Available from: <http://research.icmpd.org/fileadmin/Research-Website/Project_material/Family_Reunification_EIF/FamilyReunification_transnational_report.pdf]. [Last accessed 10.1.2018].

  • Sumption M & Vargas-Silva C 2018 ‘Love is not all you need: income requirement for visa sponsorship of foreign family members’ Journal of Economics Race and Policy DOI:10.1007/s41996-018-0022-8.

  • Tyrrell N White A Laoire CN & Carpena-Méndez F 2013 Transnational migration and childhood Routledge Oxon.

  • Van Kerckem K Van der Bracht K Stevens PAJ & Van de Putte B 2013 ‘Transnational marriages on the decline: explaining changing trends in partner choice among Turkish Belgians’ International Migration Review vol. 47 no. 4 pp. 1006-1038 DOI:10.1111/imre.12053.

  • van Walsum S & Spijkerboer T 2007 Women and immigration law: new variations on classical feminist themes Routledge-Cavendish Abingdon.

  • Vickstrom ER & González-Ferrer A 2016 ‘Legal status gender and labor market participation of Senegalese migrants in France Italy and Spain’ The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science vol. 666 no. 1 pp. 164-202 DOI:10.1177/0002716216643555.

  • Vitus K & Lidén H 2010 ‘The status of the asylum-seeking child in Norway and Denmark: comparing discourses politics and practices’ Journal of Refugee Studies vol. 23 no. 1 pp. 62-81 DOI:10.1093/jrs/feq003.

  • Wagner R 2015 ‘Family life across borders: strategies and obstacles to integration’ Journal of Family Issues vol. 36 no. 11 pp. 1509-1528 DOI:10.1177/0192513´14558299.

  • White A Laoire CN Tyrrell N & Carpena-Méndez F 2011 ‘Children’s roles in transnational migration’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 37 no. 8 pp. 1159-1170 DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2011.590635.

  • Williams L 2010 Global marriage: cross-border marriage migration in global context Palgrave Macmillan New York.

  • Wray HE Grant S Kofman E & Peel C 2015 Family friendly? The impact on children of the family migration rules: a review of the financial requirements Office of the Children’s Commissioner. Available from: <https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/26518>. [Last accessed 20.3.2018].

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 229 229 229
PDF Downloads 199 199 199