Latvian Migrants’ Circular or Permanent Migration to Norway:

Open access


This article analyses migration decisions and labour market manoeuvring of Latvian migrants to Norway, as well as the economic and social conditions that influence their choices. How do they adapt to the labour market in Norway? Do they practise circular migration, or do they aim for more permanent settlement? For some circular migrants, ‘reinforced’ motivation for migration emerges gradually, partly related to differences in working conditions – lower workload, better enforcement of work-safety regulations and opportunities for specialising in their field. Family and networks can influence both return and permanent settlement, depending on whether these are based in the home country or in Norway.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Apsīte-Beriņa E 2013 ‘International migration in the European Union: emigration from Latvia to the United Kingdom’ PhD Thesis University of Latvia Riga.

  • Boyd M 1989 ‘Family and personal networks in international migration: recent developments and new agendas International Migration Review vol. 23 no. 3 pp. 638-670.

  • Burrell K 2010 ‘Staying returning working and living: key themes in current academic research undertaken in the UK on migration movements from Eastern Europe’ Social Identities vol. 16 no. 3 pp. 297-308 DOI: 10.1080/13504630.2010.482401.

  • Bygnes S & Erdal MB 2017 Liquid migration grounded lives: considerations about future mobility and settlement among Polish and Spanish migrants in Norway Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 43 no. 1 pp. 102-118.

  • Cairns D 2014 Youth transitions international student mobility and spatial reflexivity Palgrave Macmillan New York.

  • Ciupijus Z 2011 ‘Mobile central eastern Europeans in Britain: successful European Union citizens and disadvantaged labour migrants?’ Work Employment and Society vol. 25 no. 3 pp. 540-550.

  • Constant AF & Zimmermann KF 2011 ‘Circular and repeat migration: counts of exits and years away from the host country’ Population Research and Policy Review vol. 30 no. 4 pp. 495-515 DOI: 10.1007/s11113-010-9198-6.

  • Creighton MJ 2013 ‘The role of aspirations in domestic and international migration’ The Social Science Journal vol. 50 pp. 79-88.

  • Daukšas D 2013 ‘Lithuanians in Norway: between “here’ and “there”’ Urbanities vol. 3 no.2 pp. 51-68.

  • De Jong GF 2000 ‘Expectations gender and norms in migration decision-making’ Population Studies vol. 54 no.3 pp. 307-319 DOI: 10.1080/713779089.

  • De Jong GF & Fawcett JT 1983 ‘Motivations for migration: an assessment and a value-expectancy research model’ in Migration Decision Making: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Micro-level Studies in Developed and Developing Countries eds. GF De Jong & RW Gardner Pergamon New York.

  • Dølvik JE & Eldring L 2008 Mobility of labour from new EU states to the Nordic region: developments trends and consequences Nordic Council of Ministers Copenhagen.

  • Engbersen G Leerkes A Grabowska-Lusinska I Snel E & Burgers J 2013 ‘On the differential attachments of migrants from Central and Eastern Europe: a typology of labour migration’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 39 no. 6 pp. 959-981 DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.765663.

  • Engbersen G Snel E & de Boom J 2010 ‘A van full of Poles: liquid migration from Eastern and Central European countries’ in A continent moving west? EU enlargement and labour migration from Central and Eastern Europe eds. R Black G Engbersen M Okólski & C Panţîru Amsterdam University Press pp. 115-140.

  • Faist T 2010 ‘The crucial meso-level’ in Selected Studies in International Migration and Immigrant Incorporation eds. M Martiniello & J Rath Amsterdam University Press pp. 59-90.

  • Fangen K & Mohn F 2010 ‘Norway: the pitfalls of egalitarianism’ in Inclusion and exclusion of young adult immigrants: barriers and bridges eds. K Fangen K Fossan & F Mohn Ashgate London

  • Favell A 2008 ‘The new face of East–West migration in Europe’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 34 no. 5 pp. 701-716 DOI: 10.1080/13691830802105947.

  • Fouarge D & Ester P 2009 ‘Understanding migration decisions in Eastern and Western Europe: perceived costs and benefits of mobility’ in Migration and mobility in Europe. Trends patterns and control eds. H Fassmann M Haller & D Lane. Edward Elgar Cheltenham pp. 51-72.

  • Friberg JH 2012a ‘The stages of migration. From going abroad to settling down: post-accession Polish migrant workers in Norway’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 38 no.10 pp. 1589-1605 DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2012.711055.

  • Friberg JH 2012b ‘The guest worker syndrome revisited: Migration and employment among Polish workers in Oslo’ Nordic Journal of Migration Research vol. 2 no. 4 316-324 DOI: 10.2478/v10202-012-0002-z.

  • Galgóczi B Leschke J & Watt A 2011 ‘Intra-EU labour migration: flows effects and policy responses’. Working Paper 2009.03. 2011 spring update European Trade Union Institute Brussels.

  • Glick Schiller N 2011 ‘A global perspective on migration and development’ in The Migration–Development Nexus: A Transnational Perspective eds. T Faist M Fauser & P Kivisto Palgrave Macmillan London pp. 29-56.

  • Granovetter MS 1973 ‘The strength of weak ties’ American Journal of Sociology vol. 78 no. 6 pp. 1360-1380.

  • Halfacree A 2004 ‘Utopian imagination in migration’s Terra Incognita? Acknowledging the non-economic worlds of migration decision-making’ Population Space and Place 10 pp. 239-253.

  • Haug S 2008 ‘Migration networks and migration decision-making’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 34 no. 4 pp. 585-605 DOI: 10.1080/13691830801961605.

  • Hazans M 2016 ‘Migration experience of the Baltic countries in the context of the economic crisis’ in Labour migration EU enlargement and the great recession ed. M Hazans Springer Berlin pp. 297-344.

  • Hazans M & Philips K 2011 ‘The post-enlargement migration experience in the Baltic labor markets’. IZA Discussion Paper Series (No. 5878).

  • Kley S 2011 ‘Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework’ European Sociological Review vol. 27 no.4 pp. 469-486 DOI:10.1093/esr/jcq020.

  • Krisjane Z Apsite-Berina E & Berzins M 2016 ‘Circularity within the EU: the return intentions of Latvian migrants’ in Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe: Mobility Against the Stream eds. R Nader Z Kovács B Glorius & T Lang Palgrave Macmillan London pp. 215-240.

  • Kumpikaitė-Valiūnienė V 2018 ‘Four Lithuanian emigration waves: comparison analysis of the main host countries’ Diaspora Network in International Business online first pp. 159-181.

  • Lehmann H Razzolini T & Zaikeva A 2017 ‘Internal devaluation and labour market outcomes: the case of Latvia’ Quaderni Working Paper University of Bologna.

  • Lundholm E Garvill J Malmberg G & Westin K 2004 ‘Forced or free movers? The motives voluntariness and selectivity of interregional migration in the Nordic countries’ Population Space and Place vol. 10 no. 1 pp. 59-72.

  • Lutz H 2010 ‘Gender in the migratory process’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 36 no. 10 pp. 1647-1663.

  • Massey DS Arango J Hugo G Kouaouci A Pellegrino A & Taylor JE 1993 ‘Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal’ Population and Development Review vol. 19 no. 3: 431-466.

  • McCollum D Shubin S Apsite E & Krisjane Z 2013 ‘Rethinking labour migration channels: the experience of Latvia from EU accession to economic regression’ Population Space and Place vol. 19 no. 6: 688-702.

  • Newland K Aguinas D & Terrazas A 2008 Learning by doing: experiences of circular migration Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.

  • OECD 2014 Recruiting Immigrant Workers: Norway 2014. OECD Paris.

  • Pollard N Lattore M & Sriskandarajah D 2008 Floodgates or turnstiles? Post-EU enlargement migration flows to (and from) the UK Institute for Public Policy Research London.

  • Pries L 2016 ‘Circular migration as (New) strategy in migration policy? Lessons from historical and sociological migration research’ in Return migration and regional development in Europe: mobility against the stream eds. R Nader Z Kovács B Glorius & T Lang Palgrave Macmillan London pp. 25–54.

  • Skeldon R 2010 ‘Managing migration for development: is circular migration the answer?’ Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations vol. 11 pp. 21-33.

  • Statistics Norway 2018 Immigrants and Norwegian-born to immigrant parents. Available from: (Accessed on December 4th 2018).

  • van Der Velde M & Naerssen TV (eds.) 2015 Mobility and migration choices. Thresholds to crossing borders Aldershot Ashgate.

  • White A & Ryan I. 2008 ‘Polish “temporary” Z migration: the formation and significance of social networks’ Europe-Asia Studies vol. 60 no. 9 pp. 1467-502.

  • Widding Isaksen L 2012 ‘Transnational spaces of care: migrant nurses in Norway’ Social Politics vol. 19 no. 1: 58-77.

  • Žabko O Aasland A & Endresen SB 2018 ‘Facilitating labour migration from Latvia: strategies of various categories of intermediaries’ Journal of Ethnic Migration Studies vol. 44 no. 4 pp. 575-591.

  • Zimmerman K 1996 ‘European migration: push and pull’ International Regional Science Review vol. 19 nos. 1&2 pp. 95-128.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 574 574 30
PDF Downloads 167 167 21